Great points George. Thanks for bringing the political issues to the forefront for discussion. Faith believing I individuals do not have to change their beliefs, but they also do not get to impose their beliefs on current adjudicated case law in Canada.
LGBQT children and adults have human rights in Canada that no church, faith or religious belief system can remove. Board members are responsible to uphold current laws in Canada. Anyone who cannot do that because of faith is immediately disqualified from public office.
Citizens do not get to write laws or choose the laws and legislation they follow. In a law and order society, the legal codes govern our choices. That’s the compromise we make to live in a peaceful society. We do NOT pick and choose the laws we will follow and uphold.
If we did, that would be a lawless society and create anarchy and chaos. There are all kinds of laws that people challenge in the court system every day. Many make it to the Supreme Court of Canada. That is every citizen’s right to challenge the constitutionality of any law.
Individuals and religious institutions are not free to impose beliefs that are contrary to the existing laws of Canada because they don’t like the law or approve of the rights legislation imposes. No matter how disparate the belief and law are from each other.
Religious freedom is the ability to practice your faith without imposing its beliefs and values and the associated tenets on others. That’s all it is. Churches and religious texts do not have supremacy in Canada. There is no debate about the supremacy of secular legal codes.
There is a small group of radical faithful that take issue with laws that protect people with lifestyles that are contrary to church dogma. No church is forced to change their dogmatic tenets of faith in private. But they must adhere to the law in a public forum.
A board of directors makes decisions that impact the public. The restrictions are clear. Legal codes of Canada prevail. If you cannot adhere to Canadian human rights laws, then you’re incapable of upholding the legal codes of Canada & forfeit any right to hold public office.
It’s really that simple. The conflict is with the individual, not the church or the public. It’s is up to each individual to moderate their behaviour accordingly when making decisions that impact the public. Not the church, not the public.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Personal data is the new oil for capitalism. The control of the distribution of resources through personal data aggregation and analysis is the new reality.
Harvesting personal health data is part of that objective. Change laws to make it easier.
@Paulbyjove1@Dave_Khan@jkenney@shandro It is being overlooked. Most focus on individual threat, but this legislation permits the government to harvest data and use it for any purpose they consider “in the best interests” of the public. Consider who UCP sees as the “public.”
Corporations & Dominionist Christians.
@Paulbyjove1@Dave_Khan@jkenney@shandro This legislation permits AB government to transfer individual and aggregated data to Corporate and Faith based entities for analysis, manipulation and influence.
The documentary “People You May Know” revealed that health data (more specifically mental health data) is sought.
Eventually, Biden will call in the marshals to remove Trump.
The process to remove Kenney is similar in nature. We could wait until an election 2.5 years from now. Or we could protest en masse to remove the stubborn turnip now.
My preference is now. Why allow Kenney & UCP any more opportunity to inflict policy that will kill people & exacerbate the spread of COVid? Why allow UCP the ability to claim a Public Health emergency and gain another power grab?
Law and order, broadcasting laws, the inability to outright lie in media like Fox News does. Think Hannity and you’ll know what I mean. Hannity “reports” completely bogus disinformation. Fake news that doesn’t have an ounce of truth.
@MgS_2011@brianlilley@anthonyfurey Canadian legislation limits how media portrays the far right. Because of laws put in place to keep information truthful and based on facts. But mainstream media has found a way around those laws and regulations. They need to be tightened up.
Emmanuel Macron will be passing legislation very soon requiring incendiary terrorist narratives to be removed from Social Media within 1 hour in France.
Canada and every democracy needs to do the same.
Democracies across the globe need support from the public to achieve this initiative.
We must let Facebook, Twitter, Google and all social media know that indoctrination of vulnerable members of the public with toxic narratives is unacceptable and a crime. A hate crime.
Hate speech is not free. To maintain the freedom, we limit hate speech. When we don’t, our current circumstances are the end result. A surge in autocracy.
A coordinated effort from every Western Democracy will limit the ability for hate speech and recruitment to fascism.
As we wait for the transition of power from despot to democrat, Facebook (Zuckerberg) has taken it upon itself to aid in the obstruction of that power transfer, facilitation of an insurrection narrative and disregard for the will of the American electorate.
In other words, the Social Media monopoly Facebook commands globally has gone full fascist in an attempt to preserve the corrupt and criminal hold on power by Republicans and Trump Administration.
Aiding and abetting a coup d’état.
As if there weren’t enough other reasons to dismantle Facebook’s monopoly, Zuckerberg is playing his cards and revealing clearly that Cambridge Analytica election interference was not just a onetime anomaly, but is now a feature of Facebook’s business model.