Voter fraud conspiracy enthusiasts are engaging in what you might call a Gish Gallop, throwing tons of arguments against the wall to see what sticks, to make it exhausting an distracting to debunk.
Gish gallops are difficult to handle, because it is actually very easy to make something up, and very difficult to bear down, investigate, and show why the lie is not true.
For instance, I could say, right now, that Ivanka Trump voted illegally in Pennsylvania.
That took me no effort at all to say. Now, to prove me wrong, you go through voter registration and you say "AHA, she's not registered."
And then I say, "She didn't use her real name."
Now, even more work to debunk. You've got to track her travel, or show fraud impossible.
And a smart person could probably manage to do this in, oh, half an hour.
But then I pile on. I say that actually, voters who showed up in person were given TWO ballots and allowed to vote twice.
And non-white voters were given special pens that create higher error rates.
And the real gem of the technique is that, in the process of debunking all the claims, you shift the burden. Suddenly, if the galloper can come up with one claim that isn't summarily debunkable, it sticks!
The weak point of the gish gallop is that it requires a certain shamelessness about being wrong.
But there are people in the world who can be wrong, repeatedly, without losing credibility.
And, right now, a group of people who told us of roving migrant caravans, and massive voter fraud that didn't materialize, and vaccines by election day, and walls and trade deals and health plans, are every bit as credible as they ever were.
Honestly it's an amazing strategy and something of a cheat code. And the only real way to address it is to point out what's happening.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gavin McInnes is currently suing the Southern Poverty Law Center for describing the Proud Boys as a "hate group," claiming that they're mostly known for handing out Christmas presents.
There have been no filings in this case for almost a full year, despite some excellent lawyering from the SPLC. The case was reassigned to a new judge on that date, pictured below:
Are they reassuring foreign adversaries that they won't be meaningfully punished for assisting them in the election and then lying to the public and the FBI about it?
Pennsylvania GOP are alleging that officials checked to make sure that ballots were properly filled out and gave people an opportunity to fix those ballots. The cure?
Some pretty last minute work to file this on November 3 when they apparently knew about this on October 31, assuming it happened.
The evidence that the ballots were improperly "pre-canvassed" (checked for defects) appears to be that ballots were on a table where anyone could get to them.
@RottenInDenmark So normally when there's a legal story, I feel like my role is to be like "it's actually not that crazy and if you understood a bit better you'd understand there are two perspectives."
But this is literally adopting a new theory of the Constitution 5 days before election.
@RottenInDenmark There's this case called Purcell that's like "don't do last minute shit that's gonna fuck up the election." And what these judges decided is that state legislatures have the sole, nondelegable ability to set state policy, based on this in the Constitution.
@RottenInDenmark Conservative judges have, EXTREMELY RECENTLY, taken to arguing that under this, state courts are powerless to hold that state constitutions forbid legislatures from doing things. And also, here, that they can't delegate power to the secretary of state.
It would thrill me to the cockles of my heart if we could provide Americans a working knowledge of their constitutional rights in high school.
Because they are sure as hell not getting it from the news.
I remember vividly that I got to participate in a mock trial in 4th grade based on Tinker v. Des Moines, and how exciting it was for me to get to make those arguments.
But that was literally the last time my school meaningfully spoke about a right other than voting.
So yeah, no wonder you've got people raving about HIPAA and sedition and treason. Without a grounding in what the law actually says (which in itself provides a super interesting historical context) you've got no bullshit detector.