Gavin McInnes is currently suing the Southern Poverty Law Center for describing the Proud Boys as a "hate group," claiming that they're mostly known for handing out Christmas presents.
There have been no filings in this case for almost a full year, despite some excellent lawyering from the SPLC. The case was reassigned to a new judge on that date, pictured below:
I know I keep bringing up this lawsuit, but this really is like if the Nazis sued Skokie for not welcoming them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Justice Alito once dissented from an opinion holding that officers were not authorized to strip search a ten-year-old girl who was not named in the search warrant.
The officers claimed that they were authorized to search the child because they had asked for permission to search "all occupants." But the judge only authorized them to search the male resident in the warrant he signed.
Alito, then a judge on the Third Circuit, would have held that although the warrant did not name either female occupant, it was intended to, and there was probable cause to strip search them.
Voter fraud conspiracy enthusiasts are engaging in what you might call a Gish Gallop, throwing tons of arguments against the wall to see what sticks, to make it exhausting an distracting to debunk.
Gish gallops are difficult to handle, because it is actually very easy to make something up, and very difficult to bear down, investigate, and show why the lie is not true.
For instance, I could say, right now, that Ivanka Trump voted illegally in Pennsylvania.
That took me no effort at all to say. Now, to prove me wrong, you go through voter registration and you say "AHA, she's not registered."
And then I say, "She didn't use her real name."
Now, even more work to debunk. You've got to track her travel, or show fraud impossible.
Are they reassuring foreign adversaries that they won't be meaningfully punished for assisting them in the election and then lying to the public and the FBI about it?
Pennsylvania GOP are alleging that officials checked to make sure that ballots were properly filled out and gave people an opportunity to fix those ballots. The cure?
Some pretty last minute work to file this on November 3 when they apparently knew about this on October 31, assuming it happened.
The evidence that the ballots were improperly "pre-canvassed" (checked for defects) appears to be that ballots were on a table where anyone could get to them.
@RottenInDenmark So normally when there's a legal story, I feel like my role is to be like "it's actually not that crazy and if you understood a bit better you'd understand there are two perspectives."
But this is literally adopting a new theory of the Constitution 5 days before election.
@RottenInDenmark There's this case called Purcell that's like "don't do last minute shit that's gonna fuck up the election." And what these judges decided is that state legislatures have the sole, nondelegable ability to set state policy, based on this in the Constitution.
@RottenInDenmark Conservative judges have, EXTREMELY RECENTLY, taken to arguing that under this, state courts are powerless to hold that state constitutions forbid legislatures from doing things. And also, here, that they can't delegate power to the secretary of state.