Thread: Those who believe the destructive war against poor Armenia was about hurting Iran have bought into the narrative of Ankara entirely...there is zero evidence Iran was harmed by a war that basically harmed Armenians and Azeris...if anything Iran gained again.
The theory that all the minority groups in the Middle East have to be attacked by Ankara and its extremists and that somehow destroying Afrin...Armenia...Sinjar...hurts Iran is built on nonsense and gratuitous support for violence against innocent people.
Notice how the Ankara regime media never critiques Kataib Hezbollah, Hezbollah, Badr or Houthis...none of Iran’s real allies. We are constantly being lied to that Ankara “opposes Iran”...it doesn’t. It is allied with Iran and Russia.
Ankara’s attacks on places like Afrin, support for war against Armenia and other invasions have driven numerous countries closer to Moscow begging for protection...the West doesn’t “win” when Ankara attacks...the West always loses because no countries in region see West help
Armenia wanted protection from attacks, Afrin wanted protection...people in Sinjar war protection...none of them have been helped by the West empowering Ankara via NATO with impunity for endless invasions and attacks
The last years of Ankara’s threats against Greece, against Israel, hosting extremists, invasions, has all eroded the US and Western role in the Middle East, Ankara’s goal is to carve up and partition with region with Russia and Iran and remove US and influence, isolate Israel
The greatest scam is this theory they all these Ankara-backed invasions, often with silence or complicity of NATO, has helped the US, West or cause of human rights or anything in the region...in the opposite it has rapidly increased a Turkey-Russia-Iran conquest and harmed West
If Ankara is allowed more and more invasions, I guarantee that Iran and Russia will continue to gain. Arguing that Ankara’s extremism is good for the US...is like arguing that Mussolini and Germany’s invasions in the 1930s were somehow good for the UK and “against Russia”....
People have to understand they authoritarian religious extremist or fascist regimes are not an ally of the West or US, they only appear to be until they grow stronger. They are an ally of adversaries and they work against humanity rights, democracy and US allies.
The harm done to Armenia doesn’t empower the US or Israel or set a positive trend. All it did was let Ankara and Russia partition another landscape, another Libya, another Afrin, Idlib, Sinjar...systematic weakening of global order, and US and human rights etc
If one wanted to oppose Iran then oppose Hezbollah, and Badr and militias in Iraq and the slow digestion of Albukamal and those areas; notice Turkey NEVER does that, it never opposes Iran’s militias...because it wants to divide the region WITH them as a far-right religious ally
Turkey and Iran will soon coordinate policy against Israel and other states where they vow to “liberate Jerusalem”...they want to partition a few more countries and weaken what remains where they don’t control yet. Azerbaijan’s victory didn’t set back Iran, it did help Baku.
Never believe that a war against peaceful people has to be launched to “hurt Iran” because attacking random places that empowers Ankara will never harm Iran because it’s never directed against Iran’s armed proxies...just poor people in Afrin, Armenia etc #think
There is a phrase "trust but verify", when Ankara tells its anti-Iran friends in DC "we are against Iran," let's verify this: Turkey's pro-government media doesn't critique Iran, Turkey doesn't condemn Iranian-backed militias...Turkey AND Iran support Hamas...

No verification
There is zero...no...nada...none...evidence that Ankara's current regime opposes Iran. We will see that it supports the US re-entering the Iran deal...and that its main opposition in the region is to US allies like Israel, UAE, moderates, etc.
Every time Turkey wants a new invasion it says "Iran Iran" to some and "terrorists" to others...and "international law" to others...but it's just about Ankara's power, and often supporting authoritarian, religious extremists. Not "against Russia" which it buys S-400s from...
One of the problems with the pro-Turkey narrative is that it's always Ankara asking others to do things...it's never a back-and-forth...so it's always Israel must do X, Greece must do Y, UAE must to this, Armenia that, Iraq this, US do Z...never "and Turkey will withdraw" etc...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Frantzman

Seth Frantzman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfrantzman

10 Nov
Two bits of #Israeli defense news today: "The United States Air Force has selected Elbit Systems of America to compete for future task orders within the service’s Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (ID/IQ) contract."
"The Israel Missile Defense Organization (IMDO), in the Directorate of Defense R&D (DDR&D), of the Israel Ministry of Defense, delivered to the U.S. Army the first Multi-Mission Radars (MMR) manufactured by ELTA Systems, a subsidiary of Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI)."
Why these two details are interesting is the illustration of the close US-Israel defense relationship, one has to think of this as an ECOSYSTEM where Israel increasingly is a part of and fits into the US defense industry through procurement, partnerships and supplying key items
Read 5 tweets
9 Nov
If you want to understand Putin's foreign policy, you have to go back, at least in part, to a time when I was doing a study abroad in Moscow in the summer of 1999; and it also determines how he saw the recent Armenia-Azerbaijan criss jpost.com/international/…
I studied abroad in Mexico, Italy and Russia...later in Israel where I got my PhD. Definitely the White Nights in Petersburg were a highlight in 1999. And a formative time, I witnessed, for Russia.
I never met Putin...but I did meet Chief Rabbi Berl Lazar who has insights; sethfrantzman.com/2014/05/11/int…
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
It seems logical only on the face of it.

A. If Iran's regime was so peaceful, then no one would need security at all...but they do because Iran's regime has an agenda.

B. The regime's arrogance of "forever"...ummm it's a regime...regimes come and go, read history... Image
This feels like a bit of mafia "you better pay us for security...don't rely on others...or bad things might happen" aspect to it...threatening...under the guise of "better future"...from a regime that daily threatens Israel and others.
The arrogance of Zarif, who was educated in the US...the country the regime complains about...to pretend he is Iran and "forever"...he only has his Twitter account to say this and his job because of the regime...that's not "forever"...
Read 9 tweets
3 Nov
It's so fascinating how we were told by a small crowd of extreme anti-Iran/pro-Turkey voices that we are supposed to support Turkey against poor Armenia because "Armenia is allied with Iran"...when Iran again and again says it supports Azerbaijan retaking Nagorna-Karabakh.
There is a small little group of people who believe in the myth that Turkey is "against Iran" and "allied with the US and Israel" (it isn't), the fact is Turkey and Iran are often on the same side, such as with Hamas, or Nagorna-Karabkah issue, or on Jerusalem issue, France etc
The fact is that a few in the US who supported Ankara without question have empowered Iran and Russia...oddly, they have got the exact opposite of what they claimed...Their support of Turkey never weakened Iran or Russia...in the opposite.
Read 5 tweets
2 Nov
If you see analysis of the Middle East that talks about authoritarian states and only mentions Saudi Arabia and Egypt, what you’re reading is an information op that purposely ignores a whole series of other countries from Turkey to Qatar, Iran etc; it’s purposeful.
No one can do an analysis of the Middle East and pretend that “authoritarianism” is a problem in Egypt and Saudi Arabia and not mention the rest of the region...totally ignoring Hamas in Gaza, Assad’s regime...and most of the other countries.
And you can’t go this route of “well this is a criticism of US allies”...because Turkey and Qatar are allies and they are authoritarian...and you can’t pretend it’s only those with a “growing” authoritarianism...because they doesn’t work either.
Read 5 tweets
31 Oct
So according to politico any country that wants to be secular and critique religion somehow deserves to be targeted? Odd. So one is allowed to have countries with extreme enforced religious theocracy... not “extreme secularism”...secularists don’t carry our attacks the other way
There is no such thing as “blasphemy”...the second you use this term you accept its terms. Some places used to burn people at the stake and carry out witch trials. Claiming that this is acceptable because of “blasphemy” means one accepts it
What if one day some religion claims smiling is “blasphemy” will we all have to stop smiling or we will be told it “offended” people and they have a “right to terror”?
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!