Thread by @JunkScience

The rush to judgment about the election reminds me a lot of Climategate.

The stolen Climategate emails revealed gross and embarrassing misconduct by 'scientists.'

But the subsequent investigations never examined the content of the emails (the point of Climategate). (1/ )

Instead, the Climategate investigations oddly focused on whether the e-mails were the result of hack.

They were and no one disputed this.

As a result, the Climate investigations resulted in a whitewash of significant scientific misconduct. (2/)

Similarly with the election, Democrats and the media want to rush to judgment by just looking at ballot counts and not looking at the ballots themselves.

There is little doubt that Biden is ahead just accepting the raw ballot counts at face value. (3/)

But how many of those ballots are being wrongly counted?

Mail-in balloting was new this year.

There is much opportunity for error and fraud.

But if the actual ballots are never examined -- like the Climategate emails were never examined -- (4/)

-- merely recounting raw ballots is as much a whitewash as merely investigating whether the Climategate emails were illegally obtained.

The hurry-up-and-concede push by Democrats & their running dog media allies signals there may be much ballot fraud. (5/5)