Today Nov 12th let us remember Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity who thru His Shri Padmanabha Dasas reformed Hindu Religion & also protected it frm being reformed out of existence by Secular Govt, Secular Judiciary & Secular PIL activist combination🙏
OM Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏
Let us pray for divine guidance in our efforts to invoke Art 363 constitutional protection and save Hindu Religious Denomination from being reformed out of existence by reclaiming Art 26 rights in Hindu Deity legal personality

ImageImage
Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity the embodiment of Dharma who protected Travancore Kingdom from deadly 1918 Spanish Flu responded to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn rep of Nation's Dharma action to refer Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement 🙏
Image
On this day when we remember miracle of Temple Entry Proclamation of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity very embodiment of Dharma req His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn the rep of Nation's Dharma to follow up Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement rep that was referred MHA Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

14 Nov
Art 26 part of Basic structure of our Constitution inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya included the basic structure of Travancore Constitution protecting the Hindu Religious denomination right in Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity by virtue of merger of Kingdom donated to Deity. Image
Travancore Legislature members who were members of Hindu Religious denomination acting in Travancore Constituent Assembly capacity recommended adoption of Constitution by Constituent Assembly because Hindu Deity Rights were protected u Art 26 basic structure of the Constitution
Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity Religious Rights accruing in Art 26 arising out of dedication of Travancore Kingdom to Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy continues to be in force what has been transferred to secular state u Constitution is secular right of Kingdom admin of Deity Image
Read 7 tweets
10 Nov
Kesavananda Bharathi case argued brilliantly by Nani Palkhiwala read in limitation into word "amend" of Art 368 by saying basic structure of constitutional cannot be altered. A greater limitation exists for Judiciary which has inferior interpretative power
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement a Hindu Deity whose pious purpose of incarnation is to protect the pious purpose of followers of Hindu Religion in legal personality of Hindu Deities approached SC Nine Judge Bench to explain 👆 but was not heard.
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement after giving an opportunity to the SC to correct the situation which has arisen due to enormous interpretative power but when not heard approached His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn the representative of Nation's Dharma to correct situation
Read 8 tweets
9 Nov
Let's end "pecularism" make Bharath great again
restoring pious purpose of Art 26 as promised by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji securing victory by grace of Deities

26 Art inserted by Paramacharya
26th Nov Constitution adopted
26th Jan Constitution into force
Let us make Bharath great again by following Dharma secure protection of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity (embodiment of Dharma) gain victory over Covid19 as Travancore gained victory over 1918 Spanish Flu when entire world succumbed with His grace

Let us make Bharath great again by restoring the pious purpose of Art 26 provide protection to the pious purpose of Sanatana Dharma in legal personality of our Hindu Deities which existed on 26th Jan 1950 but lost due to "pecularism"
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
Justice Indu Malhotra's judgement is not just dissent but also the voice of dharma which is in the emblem of SC and has been equated to Constitutional Morality by late eminent jurist Shri Nani Palkhivala to whom we owe protection of our fundamental rights

As per agreement with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity pious purpose of Worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination is protected u Art 26 in legal personality of a Deity just like a Mutt key learning from Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement
thehindu.com/news/national/…
The above Sabarimala judgement view that Hindu Deity legal personality has no constitutional rights is against agreement w Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity and barred by Art 363. Deities thru rep have approached Executive to correct this view of SC.
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
Pious purpose of modern Bharath rebirth was to preserve ancient Sanatana Dharma is clear conclusion we can arrive by reading Kanchi Paramacharya's Aug 15th 1947 message. Kanchi Paramacharya also by inserting Art 26 ensured Constitution protects Dharma to be protected by Dharma ImageImageImageImage
It is by correcting Art 26 mis-interpretation which has resulted in denial of protection to Santana Dharma in legal personality of Hindu Deities that we will secure protection of Dharma clear message of Lord Chilkur Balaji to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn rep of Nation's Dharma ImageImageImageImage
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn following principles of Dharma has referred Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification to Govt headed by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji an action which itself has yielded good results frm Sept 18th. Hope Hon'ble PM can fulfill his promise ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
7 Nov
SC has power to interpret letter keeping spirit of constitution intact by focusing on letter "religious denomination" it has taken away spirit of equality in Art 26 which on 26th Jan 1950 equally protected Places of worship of all religious denominations.
Image
What started off as equal protection for places of worship of all religious denomination u Art 26 with effect of several SC judgements slowly door of Art 26 entry controlled by Judiciary has become narrow and narrow and by effect of Uttarakhand HC judgement is almost non existent Image
While celebrated Keshavananda Bharathi case was about how Parliament can take away fundamental rights thru amendment power Judiciary can also do the same using interpretative power, How followers of Hindu Religious denomination selectively denied Art 26 protection textbook case
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!