Art 26 part of Basic structure of our Constitution inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya included the basic structure of Travancore Constitution protecting the Hindu Religious denomination right in Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity by virtue of merger of Kingdom donated to Deity.
Travancore Legislature members who were members of Hindu Religious denomination acting in Travancore Constituent Assembly capacity recommended adoption of Constitution by Constituent Assembly because Hindu Deity Rights were protected u Art 26 basic structure of the Constitution
Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity Religious Rights accruing in Art 26 arising out of dedication of Travancore Kingdom to Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy continues to be in force what has been transferred to secular state u Constitution is secular right of Kingdom admin of Deity
The Religious right of Hindu Religious denomination in Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity was separated from the Secular right of Kingdom admin a basic structure of Travancore Constitution and as part of Art 26 is basic structure of our Constitution.
The spirit of ratio of Keshavananda Bharathi is that Judiciary just like Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of Constitution by taking away Art 26 right of Hindu Religious Denomination in Hindu Deities which is what SC did in Sabarimala judgement thehindu.com/news/national/…
Further the SC in Sabarimala Judgement failed to recognize that Religious right of Hindu Religious denomination in Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity continues to be in force u Art 26 by virtue of the donation of Travancore Kingdom and cannot be taken away due to Art 363 bar.
Today Nov 12th let us remember Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity who thru His Shri Padmanabha Dasas reformed Hindu Religion & also protected it frm being reformed out of existence by Secular Govt, Secular Judiciary & Secular PIL activist combination🙏
OM Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏
Let us pray for divine guidance in our efforts to invoke Art 363 constitutional protection and save Hindu Religious Denomination from being reformed out of existence by reclaiming Art 26 rights in Hindu Deity legal personality
Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity the embodiment of Dharma who protected Travancore Kingdom from deadly 1918 Spanish Flu responded to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn rep of Nation's Dharma action to refer Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement 🙏
Kesavananda Bharathi case argued brilliantly by Nani Palkhiwala read in limitation into word "amend" of Art 368 by saying basic structure of constitutional cannot be altered. A greater limitation exists for Judiciary which has inferior interpretative power
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement a Hindu Deity whose pious purpose of incarnation is to protect the pious purpose of followers of Hindu Religion in legal personality of Hindu Deities approached SC Nine Judge Bench to explain 👆 but was not heard.
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement after giving an opportunity to the SC to correct the situation which has arisen due to enormous interpretative power but when not heard approached His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn the representative of Nation's Dharma to correct situation
Let's end "pecularism" make Bharath great again
restoring pious purpose of Art 26 as promised by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji securing victory by grace of Deities
26 Art inserted by Paramacharya
26th Nov Constitution adopted
26th Jan Constitution into force
Let us make Bharath great again by following Dharma secure protection of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity (embodiment of Dharma) gain victory over Covid19 as Travancore gained victory over 1918 Spanish Flu when entire world succumbed with His grace
Let us make Bharath great again by restoring the pious purpose of Art 26 provide protection to the pious purpose of Sanatana Dharma in legal personality of our Hindu Deities which existed on 26th Jan 1950 but lost due to "pecularism"
Justice Indu Malhotra's judgement is not just dissent but also the voice of dharma which is in the emblem of SC and has been equated to Constitutional Morality by late eminent jurist Shri Nani Palkhivala to whom we owe protection of our fundamental rights
As per agreement with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity pious purpose of Worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination is protected u Art 26 in legal personality of a Deity just like a Mutt key learning from Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement thehindu.com/news/national/…
The above Sabarimala judgement view that Hindu Deity legal personality has no constitutional rights is against agreement w Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity and barred by Art 363. Deities thru rep have approached Executive to correct this view of SC.
Pious purpose of modern Bharath rebirth was to preserve ancient Sanatana Dharma is clear conclusion we can arrive by reading Kanchi Paramacharya's Aug 15th 1947 message. Kanchi Paramacharya also by inserting Art 26 ensured Constitution protects Dharma to be protected by Dharma
It is by correcting Art 26 mis-interpretation which has resulted in denial of protection to Santana Dharma in legal personality of Hindu Deities that we will secure protection of Dharma clear message of Lord Chilkur Balaji to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn rep of Nation's Dharma
His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn following principles of Dharma has referred Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement notification to Govt headed by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji an action which itself has yielded good results frm Sept 18th. Hope Hon'ble PM can fulfill his promise
SC has power to interpret letter keeping spirit of constitution intact by focusing on letter "religious denomination" it has taken away spirit of equality in Art 26 which on 26th Jan 1950 equally protected Places of worship of all religious denominations.
What started off as equal protection for places of worship of all religious denomination u Art 26 with effect of several SC judgements slowly door of Art 26 entry controlled by Judiciary has become narrow and narrow and by effect of Uttarakhand HC judgement is almost non existent
While celebrated Keshavananda Bharathi case was about how Parliament can take away fundamental rights thru amendment power Judiciary can also do the same using interpretative power, How followers of Hindu Religious denomination selectively denied Art 26 protection textbook case