Delhi High Court begins hearing Future Retail's suit against Amazon in relation to the emergency arbitrator award stalling its deal with Reliance Retail.
Let me deal with the specific points. Let me clarify why the suit has been filed : Salve
There is a transaction that Amazon is aggrieved of and they say that it is in breach of the contract: Salve
According to Amazon, FRL is demerging.. it is not prohibited. Amazon went to emergency Arbitrator for this : Salve
You are interfering with my lawful business: Salve
Let's see what is my plaint : Salve
Salve reads the plaint.
one of the steps of your assertion is that I have committed a civil offence under FEMA: Salve
There are two distinct parts. It is not an anti Arbitration suit : Salve
While the emergency order has no efficacy in law, I am entitled to ignore it : Salve
I am subject to Indian Courts. If a gentleman sitting in Singapore says something, I can bin that order. It is not to show any disrespect. I'm saying as a matter of law : Salve
There is no dispute that the Resolution on the transaction with Reliance was passed by FRL in August: Salve
Salve continues to read the plaint.
If Amazon had come as a Foreign Portfolio Investor in FRL, it would not have been 10%: Salve
If you have less than 10%, you don't have protective rights rights: Salve
Amazon is not even a minority shareholder in FRL. How can there be rights conferred upon him ? : Salve
There is difference between acting on concert and minority rights protection: Salve
If he claims that he is acting in concert with the promoters, he is directly and indirectly controlling 51% is FRL : Salve
Amazon doens't claim it is controlling 51%: Court
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#BombayHighCourt will begin hearing the pleas filed by wife of activist and #BhimaKoregaon case accused Varavara Rao seeking his release from #Talojajail where he is presently in custody.
Bench of Justices AK Menon and SP Tavade will commence hearing at 3 pm.
In the new plea filed by Rao’s wife under Art. 226, she has sought Rai’s immediate release from detention citing medical grounds and failure by government authorities to provide appropriate medical treatment in jail.
[Transwoman's plea against exclusion of transgender persons from National Cadet Corps enrollment] Kerala High Court records the oral statement of the Counsel for the Central Government for appears for the NCC.
He states that the NCC has only units for 'male' and 'female' cadets.
Continues, saying that the transwoman's application for enrollment as a cadet at her University could not be accepted as she was not 'male' or 'female'.
This is not discrimination, but a 'reasonable classification', he says.
Justice Devan Ramachandran, who is hearing the case, directs a written statement to be submitted on behalf of NCC.
At this Advocate Raghul Sudheesh, appearing for the petitioner, informs the Court that the last date for enrollment is on November 15.
Plea in Allahabad HC seeks handover of Mathura's Shahi Masjid to Hindus as its the birthplace of Lord Krishna. Plea has also urged the court to strike down Sections 2,3, 4 of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, as unconstitutional. #KrishnaJanmabhoomi #PlacesofWorshipAct
The plea in the interim seeks permission for Hindus to worship at the Masjid on certain days in a week and on Janmasthmi days till the disposal of the petition.
Petitioner argues that the sections of the Places of Worship act, 1991, invariably and indiscriminately bans all kinds of conversions whether by agreement or by legal settlement or a judicial decision.