The history of "convictions" is interesting - as I understand it (please correct if wrong), Christians popularized it to refer to dogma about sin, meaning condemnations. Later expansion to mean any belief is consistent with the assumption that pinning things down is for blaming.
In German, Schuld means debt, blame, sin, fault. Like karma (which as far as I can tell literally means causality), something you want to be free of. When memory is for tax collection, only forgetting frees and all anticipation constraints are convictions.
The term "epistemic" shares a root with πίστις, meaning "belief" and generally rendered in translations of the Christian Bible as "faith."
Excepting interpolations, I read Jesus as mostly just talking about how, in a late-stage simulacrum, his apparent miracles come from literally just having an epistemic state at all.
"Guys, we're gonna be okay, this boat has dealt with turbulence at this level before."
[Apostles stop freaking out about the wind and waves and calm down, rocking the boat less as a side effect.]
"A miracle! He calmed the waters!"
"Do you guys ... even have beliefs at all?"
"Alright, before I teach you guys how to swim, I'll show you what the finished technique looks like."
"A miracle! He walked on water!"
[Peter takes Jesus literally and manages to swim a bit before losing touch and flailing about.]
"You managed to have beliefs for a bit. Why did you stop?"
"Truly you are the Son of God!"
Facepalm.
"Oh no, we're out of wine!"
"My son the miracle-worker can take care of it."
"Come on, mom, this isn't ABOUT me."
"You servants over there, come here, and follow my son's instructions!"
"Okay..."
"They drank ALL the wine, everyone at this wedding is shitfaced and dehydrated, let's bring up those jars of washing-water."
"This tastes AMAZING this is the BEST WINE EVER WHERE DID YOU FIND THIS?"
"This is water."
"A miracle! He turned water into the finest wine!"
Sigh.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@meditationstuff@reasonisfun If that is right, then either the Hegelianism hypothesis follows or I'm making a wrong inference.
@meditationstuff@reasonisfun Otherwise, it seems to me that either you ought to actually dismiss me as too stupid to engage with, or try to explain to me the other game (or point me to an explanation).
Brilliant comedic demonstration of why my Nei Gong practice for a year was "learning to stand without freaking out" before I advanced to "slowly step side to side," & why Feldenkrais builds so slowly up to "stand up from the ground":
Most meditation & yoga instruction is approximately this bad.
The bit where he "stabilizes" his legs with his arms is a perfect parody of the kind of developmental cope Feldenkrais describes in "The Potent Self."
Ate a bunch of butter topped with raw honey and salt yesterday, and I feel just fine today. Increasingly impressed by @bulletproofexec, who seems to hold an unusual posture with respect to health that involves just orienting towards value, not picking sides.
Paleo / low-carb / carnivore cluster is biased towards hunter-gatherer autonomy, against agricultural norms and social control, macho, individualistic. Vegan / puritan / low-fat / Kellogg cluster ends up promoting rules that favor people with compliant metabolism.
Butter is very clearly an agricultural food, but has the desirable performance and health attributes that the *logic* of paleo/keto/carnivore points towards. Honey violates crude versions of this logic but empirically is just good. Noticing both as good requires equipoise.