Let me try to explain this to my grandma.
Me: You know about atoms, right.
Grandma: Yea, I think so, but I died 50 years ago, so go slow.

pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja…
M: Atoms have nuclei and electrons. We worry about where the nuclei are, because the electrons just sort of follow them around.
G: Got it. This is easy.
M: We are made up of molecules. Molecules are groups of atoms connected in a specific way.
G: Like a group of friends.
M: More like a patchwork quilt. The pieces are the nuclei and the stitching is the electrons.
G. But you said not to worry about the electrons.
M: Well, the electrons can follow around more than one nuclei, holding groups together.
G: Like Friends.
M: Ok, like friends. But if you think of the quilt, a certain way of stitching holds the patches, together in a certain way. That is the molecule. I will call each way of stitching a “state” and the very best way the “ground state.”
Some less good way of stitching is the “excited state.”
G: Ground state, excited state, got it.
M: So you shine a light on one quilt, and it changes its stitching, and it goes up to another quilt and changes that one’s stitching.
G: You don’t know much about quilts, do you?
M: Ok, like a group of friends. If you break up one friendship, it can break up another, and after a while the groups have changed. Call the first friendship the “sensitizer” and their breaking up puts them in an excited state.
G: So the friends fight over a quilt, got it.
M: Uh, yea, ok, so it makes a difference which friends fight. There are violent high-energy friends that when they fight, it is a bar fight. They hit the people around them, and then they hit more people. Everyone around scurries.
It is hard to guess which other friendships will end and which new ones will form, but the changes are most likely for those closest to the fight.
G: That is why this is a dry town. Bars are bad.
M: But fights between mild-mannered low-energy friends still make a difference. When they fight, it will still cause everyone else to change over time. But it is predictable. The weakest friendships will end.
G: How do you know which are the weakest?
M: Well, actually, it is the friendships between the lighter people that change most.
G: Here, have some cake. Your friendships will last forever. You are such a cute boy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Singleton

Dan Singleton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dasingleton

2 Mar
Order, chaos, bah. This is chemistry, in fact it is my entropy and free energy lecture. We teach both so badly that most chemists, for God’s sake, understand neither. I use analogies like this, or a simple marble shaker, to show the ideas. Let’s go.
The shaking rate is important, let’s name it T.
The average height of the mass of the nails seems important, let’s give it a name, I dunno, H. The H started high and went lower, but with greater T or lighter nails or less gravity it could have gone up.
But something a little more subtle is also important, and that is the number of ways the nails can be arranged. A low H limits the positions for the nails, so there are fewer ways they can be arranged. At a high H there are more. Let’s call the number of ways, maybe, omega.
Read 14 tweets
2 Jan
Ok, so I have now gone through two MOOC courses on climate change, the older David Archer Coursera course and Michael Mann edX course, and I have some recommendations for my fellow non-climate scientists.
First, absolutely do take a course. Yea, I know, our own areas of science are enough of a struggle, and we are each unlikely to become climate activists. This is, however, the preeminent scientific moral issue of our time, and it is not going away in your lifetime.
Your training lets you understand the physics, the evidence, and the uncertainties at a level that most can't. That gives you the responsibility to apply your abilities to every climate news story and every dumb internet or Thanksgiving table argument, even if only for yourself.
Read 14 tweets
26 Jun 19
Interesting thread/comments, but I think it misses something important. It is of course true that science criticisms should be professional and not cruel.

But the very worst, most devastating criticism is the one that no one tells you about.

I have so many stories. 1/n
At a long prior version of the GRC I’m at now, I recall sitting in the rental car of an old friend and famous chemist, drinking beer, while he alternately expressed his pain and sadness and the hurtful effects of his NIH grant being turned down. This was not because of any flaw
in the science - that was indisputably terrific - but because of the criticism that he was not giving enough credit and referencing to a previous researcher. I had been on that Study Section. The criticism had been floating around but “kind” and shy people had not told my friend
Read 13 tweets
8 Apr 19
1. Ok, this is the thread to end all threads, or possibly my career. I am about to trash a new paper in @sciencemagazine, its editors, its reviewers, C&E News, others who stated or wrote adoring commentaries, anyone who looked at the paper or its commentaries without seeing
2. anything wrong, the often sloppy thinking of organic chemists and the increasingly irresponsible way we teach new ones. I will however try my best not to trash the authors themselves. When I was an editor, I rejected without review a paper by an NAS member that had
3/ similar-level errors, so anyone can make mistakes. Their reaction is still cool. I will however have, er, questions about the confluence of scientific and non-scientific issues that might have influenced this paper.
Read 27 tweets
19 Oct 18
Working my way through faculty applications one again, and I am afraid I have to do this with a bottle of wine, because it is the only way I can keep from screaming. There are so many great people in the pile, people who dedicated all of their twenties and often half of
their thirties to science, at poverty wages, when I know that very few of them will get an academic job, because there is so damn many of them. Science is eating its young. Chemistry being better than many other areas is still not good enough. They deserve better. They deserve
to have had a real job working for themselves or working their way up in a company five years ago. This is wrong, and each year it gets worse. This makes achieving diversity harder and harder - one has to have every advantage to be able to work so hard for so long, for the
Read 5 tweets
9 Sep 18
Dear Fellow Profs.

We need to talk. Your lectures are clear and eloquent, you use the latest classroom innovations, and you care about your students.

But your exams suck. This undermines everything else you do.

(tl,dr: collect and use data, test achievement)
One sees endless cutesy questions that are essentially pure “IQ” tests, essay questions that measure bullshitting ability, word questions that test mind reading, multiple choice questions that assess testing strategy. (Is dimensional analysis really all you wanted to test?)
Then there are the questions that the students who know the most are less likely to get. And there is the leveling of exams that pushes the highest grades to students having just the right (meaning the prof’s) level of pedantry and neuroticism.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!