I wish there was a way to go "woah hold up, this book thing is harmful, could we not, please" without immediately making every marginalized #ownvoices author panic that they'll be cancelled for vastly smaller offences than the one we are actually talking about.
But there actually isn't one at this point in time, I think, for a lot of reasons.

Like, #ownvoices authors *do* get held to a higher standard than random privileged people and held over the coals for much smaller mistakes. That's not in our imaginations.
Anyway if you are an autistic author and you are feeling this panic right now, I just want to say:

(1) big mood

(2) you are NOT the problem here, trust me

(3) I'm sorry for anything I might have done to make the feeling worse.
I wish there was more room for nuance in the way we talk about books, I really do. I wish we had unequivocal language to say "this is really harmful" but also to say "this is ambivalent" and "this does some really cool things in an imperfect way" and-
"this makes me uncomfortable but it might be valuable for someone else" and "this is valuable for me but I see why it might not be good for others" and "this is too dark for me [but in a non-judgey way]" and... on and on. I wish we had more sense of proportion?
I try to use nuance this way on Autistic Book Party. And some things don't deserve it! Some things really don't have any redeeming qualities. But there's so much else that's gray.
And there's so much, especially from #ownvoices authors, that isn't even gray so much as just *sensitive* - it reveals thoughts and experiences that are painful, it contains our own imperfection and mess, and we fear we'll be judged very harshly for it and sometimes we are.
And also, people are going to legitimately disagree about the boundaries of all of these categories, which makes it even harder.
I don't know. I believe good representation matters! But I've been in this game for a decade and the longer I watch this discourse go on the less and less I feel good about participating.
If you, strangers on Twitter, knew the depths of my own fear of Being Discovered To Be Problematic, and the bizarre things I have done in private to combat this fear, you would LAUGH. It would be genuinely ludicrous to most of you. The pressure authors feel is absurd.
And yet... some things are actually harmful! And sometimes I wanna talk about those things. So I don't feel like "never call things out" is the solution either. I don't know what the solution is. I don't KNOW.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ada Hoffmann

Ada Hoffmann Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @xasymptote

12 Jun
I keep thinking about those tweets that went around a few weeks ago. The ones stating incredulity that fans of stories where plucky rebels beat oppressive regimes - Star Wars, Harry Potter, Hunger Games etc - could fail to support real life rebels like BLM.

I have a thread.
There's been a weirdly polarized debate that's been playing out in fandom spaces for years now about the effect fiction has on reality.

To some extent I think the really polarized stances are both strawmen, but they're the ones that keep coming up in my feed.
One of the really polarized stances is that fiction doesn't affect reality at all, and the other is that there's an extremely strict one-to-one correspondence between the two - that if you read or write about bad things you must be bad in real life, and so on.
Read 26 tweets
1 Mar
Lately a lot of people have told me in different context how they appreciate the compassion I show for my characters, even the "unlikable" ones.

So I want to thread a bit about how I do that. It's a learned skill, and I was not always any good at it.
I should mention first of all that thinking of this in terms of "compassion" is strange for me, because that's not how I think of it or what I call it in my head, and it took me a long time to understand what people were referring to when they said they saw this in my writing.
But what I think it comes down to for me is simply remembering that everyone has a reason for what they are doing.

It's not always a good reason - but also, you don't have to think of it in terms of reasons being "good" and "bad." They're just reasons.
Read 17 tweets
19 Jan 19
[cn:sw] Hi tweeps! I'm sick today, but not too sick to watch RETURN OF THE JEDI.

Unpopular opinion: This is my favourite of the Original Trilogy. Always has been.
[cn:sw] Several reasons why RETURN OF THE JEDI is my favourite, but they can be boiled down to two.

First: especially as a kid, I was all about the creatures, monsters, aliens. And boy does Episode VI deliver. :D
[cn:sw] First you have the Jabba's Palace sequence, which is ALL ABOUT the creatures. Humans are a distinct minority.

And it carries over to the Battle of Endor, in which they FINALLY bothered to have non-humans in the Rebel Alliance. Also Ewoks. Shut up, I love them :D
Read 86 tweets
20 Dec 18
Ok, a friend of mine just got a novel rejection saying that their #ownvoices autistic protagonist wasn't "autistic enough."

The editor's basis for saying this was that they, the editor, had been watching the show "Atypical."

Buckle up: I am going to talk about this AT LENGTH.
In this thread, if you are NT, I am going to explain several reasons why you SHOULD NOT EVER judge if a character is "autistic enough" by how well they match autistic characters on TV. Any TV.

Then when I am done with that I will suggest some things you can do instead.
Why should you not judge autistic characters by what you see on TV? There are several reasons.

There are several types of autistic representation on TV, from good to horrible. None of them should be used as a litmus test for another character's autisticness.
Read 25 tweets
11 Oct 18
Today I feel like making a thread on the topic of HOW TO DETECT CURB CUTS.

A.k.a. "I'm able-bodied. This thing is for disabled people. Can I use it?"

The answer is not always no! You can often figure it out by asking yourself just 2 additional questions.
First, some background - the "curb cut" effect is a well known effect in which something is designed to help disabled people but turns out to help other people too.

Curb cuts are those places on street corners where the sidewalk curb slopes gently down to the street.
Curb cuts are useful for people who use wheelchairs and other mobility devices.

They also make life easier for parents pushing strollers, travelers pulling wheeled suitcases, and other folks who happen to be traveling on the sidewalk with something heavy.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!