When I was young, I thought I was called to be a missionary to mainliners, preaching the Gospel to a sleeping church. I failed - it took more wisdom and perseverance than I had.
But what if - hear me out - some of us are called to be missionaries to evangelicals.
Don't overthink this. Everyone needs to hear the Law & Gospel over and over.
And to let the Law convict us where *we* have fallen short - not just the secular culture around us.
Maybe it's *our* churches which need to hear the Gospel - and apply its ethics anew.
To be specific, the evangelical movement has lacked clear thinking and integrity regarding the basic ethics of means and ends.
It has placed power and winning above the fruit of the Spirit.
It is a syncretistic religion, combining faith and materialism.
It needs missionaries.
*I should add that I am blessed to pastor a spiritually-minded and mature congregation and am part of an overall healthy presbytery. That is all my character can handle.
But parts of the evangelical Reformed world w/ its unwitting syncretism, freaks me out. I would wither there.
I should also be super clear that I am not saying go and preach revival to a bunch of unconverted folks in the pews.
Please see the second tweet. I baptize babies after all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a tweet storm of two-kingdom Bible verses, for no particular reason.
"Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare." ~ Jeremiah 29:7
“Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” ~ Mark 12:17
So finished @kkdumez's book, "Jesus & John Wayne" two weeks ago with lots of thoughts which I let stew for a fortnight. Here are a few of them. Probably a series of short threads rather than one long one. 1/9
First, who should read it? Well, everyone. I was a history major with a focus on American intellectual history, so I love this stuff. If you enjoy 20th century American church & political history, give it a whirl. 2/
Second, if you are a non-Christian or even a mainline Christian foreign to the evangelical sub-culture, pick it up. But please be aware, as @kkdumez points out at various places, this is a monograph. It shows one side of evangelicalism in particular, but not the only side. 3/
Me: The whole "union with Christ" as a doctrinal solve-all is overblown. Of course it is true! But, pastorally, it's not necessarily more useful to emphasize than any of the benefits of redemption. 1/5
Yes, all the benefits hold together under the banner of Union with Christ. But to repeat the phrase over and over as some sort of mantra is not usually that helpful. Often, what a person needs to hear about are the benefits themselves. 2/5
Jesus brings us: justification, adoption, sanctification, glorification. That's how Westminster (and one dare might say, Romans) is organized. There's a reason for that.
Again, I am *not* arguing against the wonders and grace of Union with Christ. Please don't misunderstand. 3/5
A study of warrior imagery in the New Testament might do the evangelical manhood guys some good. A few texts come to mind (a thread):
1) Let's start with the Beatitudes (Mt. 5:1-12). Blessed are the meek, etc. Remember those?
1/10
2)There there is Mt. 5:39: turn the other cheek. Many evangelical sermons on this verse are expositions about all the times this does not actually apply, because "truth" and "our rights." 2/
3) Let's see, then there is Jesus telling His disciples that two swords was enough. Not sure His tone - whether a rebuke or allowing for self-defense - but one thing is certain: He did not say, "Arm up! Make sure you have twelve swords, plus a few daggers." 3/
And now I have found some Gulf War correspondence. You might remember that after a couple of months, Congress passed a law that we no longer needed stamps. So, apparently, I drew my own.
I also drew my parents a picture of the Saudi desert.
And after the war, drew a sketch of how it went down (this is my Dad's sharpened version of my original):
I'm Presbyterian but this about to be some big Anglican tweets right now. I found an old letter from my Dad to me in 1989, in which he responded to my question about why he stuck with the Episcopal church, and what he desired me to be. Here are portions of his answer: 1/12
"Most of all, and I stress MOST, I want you to always follow the Christian Way. As far as denominations go, it's true, I prefer that you continue in the family tradition of belonging to the greater Anglican Community." 2/
(Dad grew up at St. Paul's Episcopal Church in Summerville, SC - where his ashes will soon be interred. He was very involved as an acolyte, etc):
"By the time I left for the USNA, I had memorized the Morning Prayer and Communion Services from the 1928 Prayer Book." 3/