USCIS has released a new version of the naturalization civics test. There are 128 questions total, of which 20 will be asked. Candidates must answer 12 of these 20 correctly. uscis.gov/citizenship-re…
interesting to see what questions got added. this seems to be a new one Image
Here is a test question whose "correct" answer changed from past test (1st image) to new one (2nd image). And another similar q added about House (3rd).
Perhaps thematically related to Trump administration's ongoing efforts to change who the census should count for apportionment ImageImageImage
That is, in official naturalization civics test question about whom US senators/representatives represent, Trump admin changed the correct answer from “all people” to just “citizens."

Con law profs out there -- how would you evaluate this answer if given on homework?
This question also appears to be new Image
Minor change here from old test (left) to new (right) -- name three rights, rather than two ImageImage
Another apparently new question Image
Also lol to the addition of this new question. Should be a disclaimer that it doesn't apply to POTUS Image
Maybe this one too Image
More allowable answers to revised question about why colonists fought British/declared independence from Britain. Old question/answers on left, new on right ImageImage
New question added about notable Revolutionary War events Image
Sorry Poor Richard, your almanac is no longer an acceptable answer for q about why Benjamin Franklin is famous. Inventions now matter though! (some other changes too - old q on left, new on right) ImageImage
Hamilton has also been upgraded -- gets his own question on the citizenship test now! In old test he just came up as 1 of 4 possible answers to question about Federalist Papers authorship #nonstop Image
This question, from old test, about what led to the Civil War is now gone. Image
This question appears to be new Image
This question is new (though there was a question just about Susan B. Anthony on old test) Image
New question about why US entered WWI Image
Two new questions about when men and women got right to vote
(civil rights historians might dispute these answers...) ImageImage
new questions about Great Depression Image
new question about why US entered WWII (similar to question earlier in thread, about WWI) Image
Reframing of question (now questions plural) about the Cold War -- what were we concerned about, and who was our rival. Old test question on left, new test questions on right. ImageImage
These questions -- about our reasons for wars in Korea and Vietnam -- are new as well. Image
So many new questions about why we entered wars! Image
this fits too with that theme Image
Another new question, about examples of U.S. innovation. IMHO Broadway musical, jazz, other cultural contributions should be allowable answers on this list 🎶 Image
New Latin question Image
And, in keeping with the many new questions about U.S. military history, two other new questions about purpose of Memorial Day and Veterans Day Image
Revised "We the People" question, which I forgot to include earlier, is a bit odd. Old question left, new one right. ImageImage
Most of the old test's geography questions are gone (except remaining question about location of Statue of Liberty) Image
Yes thank you I see all your tweets about how badly Tommy Tuberville would do on this test

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Catherine Rampell

Catherine Rampell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @crampell

15 Nov
Fifteen Asia-Pacific economies formed the world's largest free trade bloc on Sunday, a China-backed deal that excludes the United States, which had left a rival Asia-Pacific grouping under President Donald Trump. cnbc.com/2020/11/15/asi…
When Obama spoke of having the US, rather than China, “write the rules of the road” on trade, this is the alternative trade pact (then still in negotiations) that he specifically warned about. washingtonpost.com/opinions/presi…
Pacific trade pact that Obama admin negotiated & that Trump then pulled us out of, TPP, was put into place without us, renamed CPTPP. To my knowledge Biden still hasn't said whether he would rejoin the deal. Here's what he told The Post during the primary: washingtonpost.com/graphics/polit… Image
Read 6 tweets
28 Oct
Stock market slide muddles Trump’s economic message days before 2020 election washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020…
In a recent poll asking voters to name Trump's "major accomplishments," top response had been "boosting the stock market" today.yougov.com/topics/politic… Image
"Boosting the stock market" as your greatest presidential achievement would be lackluster enough. U.S. stocks are mostly owned by rich people and foreigners, as @stevertax has pointed out.
But then to lose even *that* meager bragging right...
taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/who-own…
Read 4 tweets
27 Oct
No, Biden isn’t going to unilaterally kill fossil fuels. Renewables/battery tech have gotten so cheap, so fast, that they’ll eventually replace fossil fuels *no matter what* the next president does. Only question is how quickly this transition happens washingtonpost.com/opinions/biden…
Biden's statement about transitioning away from oil only seems radical if you ignore what the industry itself is saying. E.g. the usually bullish OPEC recently said developed nations are past peak oil. washingtonpost.com/opinions/biden…
International Energy Agency’s new World Energy Outlook found that solar PV is “consistently cheaper than new coal- or gas-fired power plants in most countries, and solar projects now offer some of the lowest cost electricity ever seen.” washingtonpost.com/opinions/biden…
Read 10 tweets
25 Oct
Earlier this year I wrote about visa applications getting rejected for having inapplicable blanks on them. Thanks to a newly resolved FOIA suit, we now have a better sense of the scale of this policy and its consequences.
They're enormous. (thread)
This summer, lawyers from @UrbanJusticeDVP & @ClearyGottlieb filed a FOIA suit to get info about how the "no blanks" was being applied to just one category of visa, the U-visa. U-visas are given to victims of serious crimes who assist law enforcement to catch/prosecute criminals
No-blanks policy went into place for U applications on Dec 30, w/ no advanced warning. In first few weeks, *98%* of these applications were rejected because of new policy -- applicant without middlename hadn't included middlename, no current address offered for dead parents, etc.
Read 20 tweets
23 Oct
So...I just scraped new State Dept data on student visas (F-1's), and it looks like student visa issuance fell by ~70% from FY2019 to FY2020.

This is an astounding idiotic own-goal for America, given that education is one of our most successful exports.
What happened? First, covid closed consulates in the spring, and various travel bans then prevented issuance of visas initially for students in some countries even when consulates reopened. Some of that got sorted out eventually. But then...
...Trump admin wouldn't grant visas to new internat'l students if classes were online, as is the case for many schools during covid. (Initially ICE said even *returning* foreign students wouldn't be allowed to study here if classes are online, then changed to new students only)
Read 15 tweets
21 Oct
Letter opposing Donald Trump's re-election signed by 670 economists, including seven Nobel laureates:
George Akerlof (2001)
Roger Myerson (2007)
Peter Diamond (2010)
Christopher Sims (2011)
Alvin Roth (2012)
Oliver Hart (2016)
Paul Milgrom (2020)
sites.google.com/site/econagain…
Interestingly, a similar letter in 2016 was signed by 794 economists
sites.google.com/site/economist…
To be fair, looks like the 2016 letter was initially released with "only" 370 names, and then grew as time went on and the letter circulated more broadly. Same might happen again. washingtonpost.com/news/rampage/w…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!