USCIS has released a new version of the naturalization civics test. There are 128 questions total, of which 20 will be asked. Candidates must answer 12 of these 20 correctly. uscis.gov/citizenship-re…
interesting to see what questions got added. this seems to be a new one
Here is a test question whose "correct" answer changed from past test (1st image) to new one (2nd image). And another similar q added about House (3rd).
Perhaps thematically related to Trump administration's ongoing efforts to change who the census should count for apportionment
That is, in official naturalization civics test question about whom US senators/representatives represent, Trump admin changed the correct answer from “all people” to just “citizens."
Con law profs out there -- how would you evaluate this answer if given on homework?
This question also appears to be new
Minor change here from old test (left) to new (right) -- name three rights, rather than two
Another apparently new question
Also lol to the addition of this new question. Should be a disclaimer that it doesn't apply to POTUS
Maybe this one too
More allowable answers to revised question about why colonists fought British/declared independence from Britain. Old question/answers on left, new on right
New question added about notable Revolutionary War events
Sorry Poor Richard, your almanac is no longer an acceptable answer for q about why Benjamin Franklin is famous. Inventions now matter though! (some other changes too - old q on left, new on right)
Hamilton has also been upgraded -- gets his own question on the citizenship test now! In old test he just came up as 1 of 4 possible answers to question about Federalist Papers authorship #nonstop
This question, from old test, about what led to the Civil War is now gone.
This question appears to be new
This question is new (though there was a question just about Susan B. Anthony on old test)
New question about why US entered WWI
Two new questions about when men and women got right to vote
(civil rights historians might dispute these answers...)
new questions about Great Depression
new question about why US entered WWII (similar to question earlier in thread, about WWI)
Reframing of question (now questions plural) about the Cold War -- what were we concerned about, and who was our rival. Old test question on left, new test questions on right.
These questions -- about our reasons for wars in Korea and Vietnam -- are new as well.
So many new questions about why we entered wars!
this fits too with that theme
Another new question, about examples of U.S. innovation. IMHO Broadway musical, jazz, other cultural contributions should be allowable answers on this list 🎶
New Latin question
And, in keeping with the many new questions about U.S. military history, two other new questions about purpose of Memorial Day and Veterans Day
Revised "We the People" question, which I forgot to include earlier, is a bit odd. Old question left, new one right.
Fifteen Asia-Pacific economies formed the world's largest free trade bloc on Sunday, a China-backed deal that excludes the United States, which had left a rival Asia-Pacific grouping under President Donald Trump. cnbc.com/2020/11/15/asi…
When Obama spoke of having the US, rather than China, “write the rules of the road” on trade, this is the alternative trade pact (then still in negotiations) that he specifically warned about. washingtonpost.com/opinions/presi…
Pacific trade pact that Obama admin negotiated & that Trump then pulled us out of, TPP, was put into place without us, renamed CPTPP. To my knowledge Biden still hasn't said whether he would rejoin the deal. Here's what he told The Post during the primary: washingtonpost.com/graphics/polit…
In a recent poll asking voters to name Trump's "major accomplishments," top response had been "boosting the stock market" today.yougov.com/topics/politic…
"Boosting the stock market" as your greatest presidential achievement would be lackluster enough. U.S. stocks are mostly owned by rich people and foreigners, as @stevertax has pointed out.
But then to lose even *that* meager bragging right... taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/who-own…
No, Biden isn’t going to unilaterally kill fossil fuels. Renewables/battery tech have gotten so cheap, so fast, that they’ll eventually replace fossil fuels *no matter what* the next president does. Only question is how quickly this transition happens washingtonpost.com/opinions/biden…
Biden's statement about transitioning away from oil only seems radical if you ignore what the industry itself is saying. E.g. the usually bullish OPEC recently said developed nations are past peak oil. washingtonpost.com/opinions/biden…
International Energy Agency’s new World Energy Outlook found that solar PV is “consistently cheaper than new coal- or gas-fired power plants in most countries, and solar projects now offer some of the lowest cost electricity ever seen.” washingtonpost.com/opinions/biden…
Earlier this year I wrote about visa applications getting rejected for having inapplicable blanks on them. Thanks to a newly resolved FOIA suit, we now have a better sense of the scale of this policy and its consequences.
They're enormous. (thread)
This summer, lawyers from @UrbanJusticeDVP & @ClearyGottlieb filed a FOIA suit to get info about how the "no blanks" was being applied to just one category of visa, the U-visa. U-visas are given to victims of serious crimes who assist law enforcement to catch/prosecute criminals
No-blanks policy went into place for U applications on Dec 30, w/ no advanced warning. In first few weeks, *98%* of these applications were rejected because of new policy -- applicant without middlename hadn't included middlename, no current address offered for dead parents, etc.
So...I just scraped new State Dept data on student visas (F-1's), and it looks like student visa issuance fell by ~70% from FY2019 to FY2020.
This is an astounding idiotic own-goal for America, given that education is one of our most successful exports.
What happened? First, covid closed consulates in the spring, and various travel bans then prevented issuance of visas initially for students in some countries even when consulates reopened. Some of that got sorted out eventually. But then...
...Trump admin wouldn't grant visas to new internat'l students if classes were online, as is the case for many schools during covid. (Initially ICE said even *returning* foreign students wouldn't be allowed to study here if classes are online, then changed to new students only)
Letter opposing Donald Trump's re-election signed by 670 economists, including seven Nobel laureates:
George Akerlof (2001)
Roger Myerson (2007)
Peter Diamond (2010)
Christopher Sims (2011)
Alvin Roth (2012)
Oliver Hart (2016)
Paul Milgrom (2020) sites.google.com/site/econagain…
To be fair, looks like the 2016 letter was initially released with "only" 370 names, and then grew as time went on and the letter circulated more broadly. Same might happen again. washingtonpost.com/news/rampage/w…