🇨🇦 There are many parallels between Bill C-7 on MAID and #BillC6 on conversion therapy, which are both at the committee stage . /2
OPINION | Why new medical assistance in dying law should be sent back to the drawing board | CBC News cbc.ca/news/opinion/o…
Both deal with complex and emotionally charged issues. In both cases, the government consultation seems to have been only with activists on one side of the debate. In both cases the most visible opponents have been religious conservatives but opposition is in fact much broader /3
and includes both religious and secular concerns. One critical difference is that while the media is providing balanced reporting on Bill C-7 there is no such balance on Bill C-6. No Canadian media is covering the issues raised by Detrans Canada. /4 detranscanada.com/brief-on-bill-…
There has been no reporting on the Keira Bell case in the UK or the major rethinking of treatment for gender dysphoria which is taking place in Sweden and Finland. /5 genderreport.ca/the-swedish-u-…
Next week the Justice Committee will start considering amendments to Bill C-7. The Liberals plus either the Bloc or the NDP can control the committee so it will be interesting to see what, if any amendments, the government is prepared to consider. The Committee is also likely /6
to decide on how many meetings to hold on Bill C-6 and how many witnesses to allow. Each party is allowed to choose a number of witnesses. Only the Conservatives are presently prepared to call any witnesses critical of the Bill. I hope that @RobMoore_CPC and his colleagues /7
have done their homework and that they will bring forward witnesses who represent the full range of opinions on this issue.
The @MinJusticeEn has now published a Charter Statement on #billc6 to ban "conversion therapy." The level of analysis is embarrassingly low. Most of the paper simply summarizes various sections of the Charter that might be applicable. /2 justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/pl…
There no attempt to analyze or provide a reasoned response to any of the objections to the bill that have been raised by various groups such as the @JCCFCanada jccf.ca/published_repo… /3
The paper argues that because the bill applies only to a "practices, services or treatments" it therefore excludes "purely private discussions" with school counsellors, parents and faith leaders. The problem is that there is no clarity as to where a "private discussion" /4
🇨🇦 #billc6 debate part 1. The transcript of yesterday's debate on conversion therapy legislation is now available online. I will review it and add comments to this thread throughout the day. The debate will resume this morning. ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer…
🇨🇦 #billc6 debate part 2. First up, an eloquent speech by @GarnettGenuis at around page 1910. He explains how the definition of conversion therapy is a major overreach and needs to be fixed. Unfortunately, he does not discuss therapy for gender dysphoria in detail.
🇨🇦 #billc6 debate part 3. Comments by Conservative justice critic @RobMoore_CPC are also encouraging. He speaks about the need for the justice committee to hear from all stakeholders, including therapists dealing with gender dysphoria, to revise the definition in the bill.
While the debate on #billc6 to ban conversion therapy is being presented as a fight for the LGBTQ community, many LGBT people, and lesbians in particular, have serious concerns about the legislation. @artymortyarty explains in this video. /2
This site, created by a group of LGBT people, explores the issue in more detail. The basic concern is that conversion therapy laws will lead many children who would otherwise grow up to be lesbian or gay to misdiagnosed as transgender. /3 genderhq.org/conversion-the…
This is an acute concern for the lesbian community. Young lesbians often do not fully realize their identity until they are in their 20s. By that time they may have had at least a double mastectomy. /4 4thwavenow.com/2016/01/25/the…
@DavidLametti@MinJusticeEn It sounds like your latest talking point on #Billc6 is that parents don't have to worry because the bill does not prohibit exploratory psychotherapy for gender dysphoria. The text of the bill does not support this. /2
The language of the bill is vague. @JamesCantorPhD describes the terminology as "incomprehensible" and is concerned that it will restrict therapists from helping patients become comfortable with their original gender . /3 sexologytoday.org/2020/10/bill-c…
The effects of the bill can be judged from the effects of existing conversion therapy bans. Parents are having difficulty finding therapists who will perform a proper mental health assessment before approving transition. /4 genderreport.ca/gender-dysphor…
🇨🇦 Getting needed changes to #BillC6 on conversion therapy is going to require an unlikely alliance. The only elected officials who are willing to criticize the bill are members of the social conservative wing of the Conservative party. They are a minority and need allies. /2
The potential allies are a diverse group I will loosely describe as "gender critical" whose main concern is the treatment of gender identity. This group includes doctors, psychologists, feminists, parents of dysphoric kids and de-transitioners. Many are LGB or LGB supporters. /3
In order to make this alliance work, both sides need to accept some hard facts. The social conservatives need to accept that therapy cannot change sexual orientation. Many gays and lesbians have suffered serious abuse at the hands of conservative religious leaders. /4
🇨🇦 @MinJusticeEn, has your department done a Charter review of #Billc6? The applicable law is here. The key requirement is that the means that the law employs must be proportionate to the objective. One element of this test is /2 justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rf…
minimum restriction of protected rights. Instead of attempting to follow this principle, the drafters of Bill C-6 have aimed for maximum reach. There is no attempt whatsoever to respect the rights of religious groups to promote their teachings and the language of the bill /3
even extends to activities which are necessary and desirable. For example, it would be a crime to try to stop a 14 year old boy from having sex with older men or to help a 17 year old repress his attraction to younger children. The bill should be withdrawn and redrafted.