The best research on the impact of advertising on elections comes from Kellogg.
In major races where candidates enjoy similar name recognition, you need to significantly outspend your opponent just to move the vote by 0.5%. kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/spenku…
Mind you: The Kellogg researchers studied the impact of TV ads, which usually last 30 seconds, involve compelling visuals, present arguments that have been tested, and are well-produced.
A meme is none of this, but let's continue...
Biden outspent us 2:1 on TV and by much more on radio.
In the last 3 months, they outspent us by **$275 MILLION.**
In some of the areas where Trump saw his biggest gains with Latinos — S. Texas and Philly — we ran ZERO Spanish ads. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
That's without getting into Biden's earned media advantages on networks (like Univision), which act as stenographers for the DNC.
The number of memes required to offset those kinds of advantages is astronomical.
Realistically, it's not even possible.
Latinos were about 13% of the 2020 electorate. Let's go with the latter and say 20 million Latinos voted in 2020.
According to the AP Votecast, Trump ended up with 35% of the Hispanic vote. That's a 7-point gain from 2016, or equivalent to 1.4 million voters.
The old Rule of 7 adage suggests an ad doesn't register unless it's seen 7 x's.
So that's 9.8M meme views, worth $98,000 @ $10 CPM.
The notion that $98,000 can move 1.4M voters—in a POTUS election where you're outspent 2:1—is laughable to anyone vaguely familiar w/ advertising.
I mean, $98k can't even buy you a week of TV ads in Miami.
And that's in the absence of all sorts of context: Effectiveness of the message, whether the memes reach eligible persuadable voters, and all of Biden's counterveiling efforts and advantages (i.e. MILLIONS of $ in ads).
So with all due respect to my reporter friends, "memes" and "WhatsApp messages" shouldn't appear in your stories on the reasons why President Trump gained ground with Latinos.
There is ZERO evidence this impacted the election.
It's simply a pathetic excuse by the Democrats.
11 to 13%*
By the way, it’s not hard to imagine Beto saying:
“Like, some super gnarly memes totally duped the Latinxs brah!”
🚨🚨 THREAD: A new poll shows Joe Biden with "mediocre" support from Hispanic while President Trump builds a diverse coalition. This is only a surprise to progressives who've spent four years yelling "RACISM!!!" at the sky thinking it'll win them votes.
Here's why...
First, let's be honest: The 2020 iteration of the Democrat Party is culturally incompetent. Sorry guys, but los abuelitos, mamá y papá aren't impressed by your "wokeness." They actually find it annoying. thefederalist.com/2019/11/01/98-…
Naturally, self-righteous progressives are now bewildered that Hispanics are not automatically in lockstep with Joe Biden after they've spent years yelling "RACISM!" at the sky, straight up locura "Caso Cerrado" style to smear President Trump and his policies.
1) THREAD: To dunk on @realDonaldTrump, @CNN is now fact-checking things he never said. I analyzed a fact-check where they claimed he lied about COVID-19 testing levels. As I explain in this article for @TheBlaze, they are wrong on several counts. theblaze.com/news/cnn_bogus…
2) As @CNN's @KateBennett_DC points out, the network ran this chyron during the coronavirus taskforce briefing yesterday. It's highly misleading. Trump NEVER said the U.S. leads the world in testing on a per capita basis and CNN knows this.
3) As @CNN's own fact-checkers noted, the US has performed more tests than South Korea, which is what Trump has been saying at his press conferences and on Twitter. This is indisputable.