Yesterday we reported that in his call to action to fight #COVID19 St. Catharines mayor @WSendzik misrepresented how/where the virus is spreading. It turns out Niagara Falls mayor @jimdiodati has also made a misleading comment re: the pandemic and restaurants. (FactCheck thread)
In commentary on his Facebook page largely about Costco, Mayor Diodati talks about his view of the new #COVID19 measures imposed on Niagara restaurants:
Like Sendzik, Diodati is making a blanket comment about measures at restaurants to say further measures are unfair and will cause economic harm (certain the last part is true).
But the specific claim about the success of the pre-Saturday, pre-orange alert measures is misleading
He says that the measures in #hotspot regions like Toronto lack proof that they are working. That may be debatable, but the facts are that could be said in Niagara as well. Moreover, as we reported yesterday (and for two weeks) we know the virus is spreading at restaurants.
Specifically, we know from the case data and contact tracing that #COVID19 is spreading through clusters of 20-somethings with large social circles who have been gathering in bars/restaurants. They are also attending house parties etc with little distancing and mask-wearing.
It is also true that, to date in Niagara, there has not been much spread between unconnected groups at restaurants. However, spread among these young adult groups created the super spreader cluster (which continues to expand) that caused outbreaks in 2 Niagara LTC homes.
.@NRPublicHealth has not disclosed which homes were impacted, or if any residents of those homes with #COVID19 have died.
In short, claims that the virus is not spreading in local restaurants is not true.
What Diodati is suggesting is that because measures in Toronto may not have worked, those restrictions should not apply in Niagara where, by the logic of his commentary, the virus is not as much of a problem. But we know how and why it has spread in bars/restaurants.
It has also been made clear by @mustafahirji that for the most part, this is not the fault of the restaurant owners, but of some patrons. But if you have clusters forming, in part, in restaurants, and those clusters end up leading to LTC home outbreaks, public health will act.
For context, there are 6 LTC outbreaks in Niagara currently. Since the start of the post-summer #COVID19 wave, 14 more Niagara residents with the virus have died. 13 of them are over 80 and mostly LTC home residents.
Also of note, the order issued by @mustafahirji did not place further limits on capacities or the # people at a table. It does require more information about patrons is collected, including confirmation that folks are dining with household members or "essential contacts".
The province's #COVID19 orange alert limits occupancy to 50 people and the number of people at a table to 4. (previously it was six). Those limits will now be in effect for 28 days.
-30-
Postscript: There is no denying the awful financial impact of the pandemic on restaurants, and that is why there is a chorus of calls to the province/federal government to help them. But to claim the virus is not spreading at restaurants is false.
-30-
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few other things worth noting here about the @610CKTB by Matt Holmes with Niagara Falls mayor @jimdiodati worth further fact checking. (fact check thread)
During the interview @jimdiodati claims there are "conflicting" orders between @mustafahirji from @NRPublicHealth and the provincial government's orange alert restrictions.
This is false.
As we reported in @StCatStandard, Hirji's order didn't impact occupancy numbers for restaurants/bars set by the now-previous version of the province's code yellow. What it did was require patrons to confirm they were eating with their immediate house hold or essential contacts.
.@WSendzik is calling for rigorous enforcement of #COVID19 bylaws in bars and restaurants, rather than more restrictions. Says the public will "hear from the media in a headline" bars/restaurants are unsafe and "kill them." and "cautions" PH their coms have to be "spot on."
The claim that news headlines are "killing" businesses is, at best, misleading. We are reporting the #COVID19, where cases are coming from, and what public health is doing. If cases are being generated by gatherings at a bar, or a picnic or house parties, we will report it.
St. Catharines councillor George Darte says "Education is done. It's time to do something. It's time to take action," about #COVID19 enforcement
Ok, Niagara I will be posting some stories with more comprehensive updates very shortly, but here is a snap shot because there is a lot happening on the local #COVID19 front today. (thread)
First, the big headline: Niagara hit's a pandemic high with 63 new #COVID19 cases confirmed today. The previous record was 40 in July with the Pioneer Flower Farm outbreak.
We don't know just yet where these cases are coming from, but @NRPublicHealth data does give us some clues as to the context. Unlike the flower farm case, this does not appear to the result of a new outbreak. Meaning they are community cases or from a known outbreak.
G'evenin' Niagara. Sorry this is a bit late today (working on a lot of stories) but here is your mid (or late I guess) week local #COVID19 snapshot. (thread)
Nine more cases in Niagara today, which is in keeping with the new, second wave baseline of daily cases. Seven day rolling average is 11. Well above the 1 to 3 cases we saw just a few weeks ago. The pandemic can move fast.
To that point, compare the last seven days to new cases per day in late April during the decline of the first wave. The current situation is basically the reverse. Cases are rising as fast as they fell at that point.
As we have reported, the anti-mask groups have present a number of false claims about pandemic safety measures, including claims about masks being a violation of human rights. The hyperbole recently hit a new height with this:
(I blacked the name of the young woman because she might be a teenager.)
This post, which compared being denied service for not wearing a mask to anti-black discrimination and the Holocaust, generated a lot of support from the members of the Hugs over Masks group.
I can't believe this needs to be said, but there is nothing even remotely similar to a masking bylaw to prevent the spread of a potentially lethal virus to Jim Crow laws, and systemic, legalized racism in the US that arose after the abolition of slavery.
It is true that after having survived the flesh-eating bacteria that claimed his leg, Bouchard's already high level of popularity in Quebec turned into a cult thing, and he was regarded nearly as a saviour figure by separatists. But, contextually, it doesn't compare to Trump.
For one thing, Bouchard was not leading the province or the country, he did not have a long track record of spectacular failures in his wake and was not regarded as an existential threat to democracy itself. Trump checks all these boxes for all kinds of reasons.