dikgaj Profile picture
15 Nov, 10 tweets, 2 min read
I dont think Trump's political and biz enemies realized how much he drew his strength directly from his common supporters and therefore establishment alone, even with support from both Rep& Dem parts of establishment, wd not be enough to finish off his politics.
Republican politics itself has been changed to a great extent, even if for the medium term. Trump will now be impossible to shake off unless ;literally bumped off. But taking the second option will ensure that a Trump-2 will rise with greater support.
For his party, it will be dangerous and definitely politically suicidal to try and push him out, if he wants to run in 2024. He can ensure Reps take a hit if they diss him without even having to call for the hit. His base will do it for him on their own.
Dems didnt do well - simply because they failed to keep up the media drum beat about 10-20 "percentage point". A lot of "dem" votes wr genuine, but also a lot of them were purely "anti-Trump" votes. And perhaps the final flips wdnt hv been possible without voting irregularities.
Had Trump acted (he tried) and propagandized his actions on just three things: the police "shootings", covid-19, a "new deal" on infrastructure spending - he wd hv blocked some of the votes going to his enemies.
I dont give two flips to the claim that Trump "polarized" ppl: by same logic Dems "polarized" too. Trump's enemies have explicitly disparaged identities. By anti-racist-theory "racism" is not limited to biological identity - but to "culture" or abstract identities too.
The "pseudo-left-liberal" politics is more insidious in that unlike the "right", it pretends and draws support from popular grievances and once in power turns around on that very same grievance with viciousness. It is not a coincidence that all communist states are police states.
Not much will change under Dems for the "minorities", or "blacks": except perhaps an enhanced class of "elites" among those minorities will be created and touted for agitprop - who will in turn spurn their vast majority "common" siblings whose lives wont improve.
I also don't expect any of the police departments or outrages to diminish - and police may actually get funded more. Perhaps with more "minority" officers, and the concession that certain categories of "minority" influencers will be "untouchable".
Courts in general will not support Trump: over the centuries judiciary everywhere, when faced with ideological dilemmas -choose the option they feel is desired by the most powerful, nationally and with transnational backing -not necessarily the most popular, or the most fair one.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dikgaj

dikgaj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dikgaj

13 Nov
A wonderful glimpse into mindset of an Indian judge. The fact that he uses European proverbs without giving source context - which are all disparaging/sarcastic in the originals - shows the education was a carefully edited colonial version of European reality meant for vernae.
Coming from a judge, this is unacceptable. The values he quotes is against modern law (not sharia): as embodied in explicit ideas of war-crimes, civil-criminal laws that limit approaches to courtship or sexual unions. No, judge - not everything is fair in love, war and politics.
As far as I know the earliest known current form of judge's sentiment was in a18th c English novel "Relapse, or Myrtle Bank" as "''tho this was a confounded lie, my friend, all is fair in love and war' - note even in the original, the sense is there that this is "wrong/unethical"
Read 4 tweets
12 Nov
The judiciary have not been given the right to "lay down law" - because they are unelected. They do not "represent" people as they dont answer to and r not subject to removal, by people. Usurpation of legislation by unelected individuals is a dangerous step towards super fascism.
Constitutional courts function as checks and balances but cannot supersede the legislature. In a people's representative system no unelected functionary can be or should be allowed to impose their personal views as "laws" as it fails the test of approval by the majority.
This has been a long tussle for unilateral power over people between the courts and legislature. Those who are fond of citing "spirit of Constituent Assembly" also must know of the testy caution with which its much quoted stalwarts viewed possibility of judicial overreach.
Read 19 tweets
7 Nov
If not toned down by Biden, Harris will push for the following in foreign policy: (1) greater aggression& covert support to European anti-Russians, and Turkey against Russia - and more active interventions into Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, and against Armenia in favour of Azeris'.
(2) renewed covert support through Turkey to the Idlib zone and north-Syrian ISIS jihadis against Assad, (3) if European hesitation to move against Iran can be managed, then move against Iran - but no war that harms Sunni lobby connected to US establishment.
(3) war or proxy war on Iran can however be combined with Euro lobby pressure to get back into the nuclear deal so Harris may not have a full free hand here. (4) Renewed indirect support for Palestinian jihad will also be on cards. Again here more powerful interests will moderate
Read 9 tweets
7 Nov
The followup comments show why this tweet should not have singled her out rather than do the customary one for president after officially declared elected. She has already created the impression that encourages all scum scoundrel jihadis of the subcontinent to look up to her.
An aggressive "prosecutor" if allegedly "successful" is one whose character is to ramp up accusations without much conscience to drive bargains and if needed force acceptance of guilt where there shd be none. Same tactic cd be applied to India too to support Kashmiri jihad.
If there is an "Indian" connection, that connection should not have shamelessly ignored the plight of Hindus at the receiving end of jihad on the subcontinent, both in India and in neighbouring countries.
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
1) I never liked analyzing political ldrs as usual discourse takes that fallacious shortcut to explain history. Most US presidents dont hv to offer much either - except the first few, Lincoln, Grant, the two Roosevelts. Trump is important to understand current US nationhood.
2) the US can be understood best as modern replica of the undercurrents of old Roman republic turned oligarchy where the original mafia system was invented. In short, its a tussle between "patriotic" mafia and "globalized" mafia. At the moment they are in unstable equilibrium.
3) Trumps difficulties were unavoidable - because of the very personal features that made him the ideal solution for "patriotic" mafia - his lack of embedding into the carefully trained political operatives groomed to continue the establishment networks of power and profit.
Read 15 tweets
5 Nov
Except the participation of the voter, as much as possible of the voting and counting process should be automated and freed from human intervention. The aim should be to remove as many of the middlemen including those that can manipulate any automated system.
absentee/postal paper voting with reliance on verification and counting by pre-appointed humans at counting end is possibly the worst situation for electoral process in large populations. While electronic voting is not full proof either, but can be made more secure.
Ideally voters shd hv the right to "retrieve": to actually see how and in whose favour their vote was counted. So that groups of voters favouring a candidate or item in a referendum can cross check through automated double blind process the total votes shown as cast on their name
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!