Diane Abbott was wrong to share an online platform with apologists for China's atrocities against Muslim Uighurs. But this saga again underlines the grotesque double standards applied to a) the left and b) a Black woman.
Tony Blair is a former Prime Minister - obviously far more influential than Diane Abbott - and is guilty of two things:
1) Direct apologism for Chinese atrocities in Xinjiang province
2) A relationship with China's regime
In 2014, in an interview with a mouthpiece of China's regime, Blair made common cause between the West and China's "counter-terrorism" drive in Xinjiang, and denounced "double standards" applied to China which "is facing the same problem as we are facing." globaltimes.cn/content/866551…
This 2016 article published by the Tony Blair's Institute for Global Change is full of apologism for what should be straightforward and unequivocal condemnation of atrocities committed in Xinjiang by the Chinese dictatorship.
Blair has demonstrable links with China's regime, in this case courting their leaders on behalf of a company owned by a Saudi prince theguardian.com/politics/2016/…
Tony Blair denies being linked to these "powerful pro-China lobbyists", so it's really unfortunate he's been photographed at one of their meetings thetimes.co.uk/article/photog…
While there is ample evidence of Tony Blair defending China's "counter-terrorism" operation in Xinjiang, there is no evidence of him condemning the atrocities, merely warning against a new Cold War with China earlier this year.
Tony Blair has worked for multiple human rights abuses, including Egypt's murderous regime and being paid millions to advise the dictatorship of Kazakhstan, including offering PR advice after 15 protesters were killed by the regime.
Tony Blair has been paid millions by the Saudi dictatorship, which beheads dissidents and gays, treats women abominably, bans all forms of democracy, murders journalists, and carpet bombs Yemen.
There is no outrage over Tony Blair, no demands for disciplinary action, let alone apologies.
And yet many of his acolytes and cheerleaders and defenders today denounce a left-wing Black woman who a) is far less influential and b) has done nothing even remotely as bad.
Finally, anyone on the left who is an apologist for the atrocities committed by China's regime against the Uyghurs is a political and moral disgrace.
You should be consistent: fight human rights abuses committed by the West, by the West's allies AND by China.
The end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Private education is just one way the privileged are given their advantages. It starts from birth. Affluent parents have babies with higher birth weights. They have less cramped houses, meaning better well-being and more quiet places to study.
Better-off parents tend to have more formal education and more "cultural capital". A big gap in vocabulary between richer and poorer children opens up when they're very young. Their parents can afford private tutoring. Diets are better and their children never go hungry
Poverty can impose specific stresses on family life that the affluent tend not to have. Poorer children are more likely to suffer from mental distress and poorer physical health, all of which impact educational attainment.
Yet transphobes in powerful positions pretend they're courageous victims as they bait a marginalised minority.
There's nothing new about opponents of minorities pretending they're the real victims, hounded just for "speaking the truth"
It's still nauseating to watch transphobes in a country in which most of the media is on their side pretend they're the ones being silenced and persecuted
Courage is standing up for minorities against those who bait, ridicule and persecute them.
Courage is never adding your own personal contribution to a mountain of bigotry piled on the shoulders of trans people.
On my birthday last year, a far right extremist led an attack on me, driven by homophobia and hatred of my left-wing politics. Today, he has been handed a hefty prison sentence. theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/j…
As I wrote in my victim impact statement, prison is not a solution to far right extremism. He will go to a prison a violent far right extremist, and probably leave prison a violent far right extremist.
There is no judicial solution to the far right: it is a political problem.
The attack wasn't just driven by far right extremism, but was a homophobic hate crime.
Homophobic hate crimes have doubled over five years; transphobic hate crimes have trebled. We are desperately overdue a proper discussion about this.
"Cancel culture" is being used to describe everything from people disapproving of pedophiles to celebrities being criticised on social media.
It's become a means to protect the powerful and wealthy from being scrutinised for things they say or do.
A lot of what's called "the culture war" is just younger people trying to assert their different social and moral values over older generations who run most of the media.
A lot of older media types genuinely fear younger people as woke barbarians banging at their gates.
The essential truth of modern political debate is that younger people and older people now live on different planets. That's unprecedented: both Thatcher and Reagan won the youth vote.
My politics are based on class: this divide doesn't make me comfortable. But it's just a fact.
Have I robustly criticised him? Yes: for hiring the Holocaust denier David Irving, and for chairing a magazine which publishes racism and praises Nazis.
I'm sure @afneil didn't like being criticised for hiring a Holocaust denier, or for chairing a magazine which churns out racism and apologia for Nazis.
But in a democratic society, I have a right to challenge him on that. Yet he defends himself by hiding behind "cancel culture".
This all kicked off after I wrote a column about Andrew Neil in 2018, the point of which was not to "cancel" him, but rather to underline the point that the claim the BBC has a left wing bias is ludicrous. (Which remains the case today). theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Woody Allen continues to make films. Scarlett Johansson is still paid millions to act. Laurence Fox's last TV series was released 2 months ago. Jenna Marbles' YouTube channel remains. Jimmy Kimmel is still paid $15m a year to present.
All too often, "cancel culture" becomes a means for very rich and very powerful people to pretend they are victims when people respond to very controversial things they have used their huge public platform to say.
I'm also keeping a tally of the commentators launching passionate public tirades against "cancel culture" who have tried to menace my job because I support trans rights or speak out about endemic media racism.