This thread will be for the all encompassing details of !slamic conquests of India which are "omitted" in the history books. Please read and review.
Just to start the conversation, here's one facts most people don't know. About 80 million people died in the time between 1000 AD and 1500 AD and population of India actually reduced to 120 million from 200 million in 1000 AD. 
From Growth Of Muslim Population In Medieval India Ad 1000 1800 by K. S. Lal.
Another argument that pops up that !slamization of India did not happen and people willingly joined it else all of India would've been abrahmnic. K. S Lal refute it.
Reason 1. India was simply too vast to convert entirely.
Reason 1. India was simply too vast to convert entirely.
Reason 2. The rebellions of Hindus.
Reason 3. Bhakti Movement
Reason 3. Bhakti Movement
Reason 4. Caste system, yes caster system checked the rise of proselytization despite what modern historians think.
It is supported by the 1931 census along with Al Beruni's work.
It is supported by the 1931 census along with Al Beruni's work.
Marco Polo also added that lower castes were unwilling to convert.
Nizamuddin Aulia also confirmed the same that hindus were not converted by sermons.
Nizamuddin Aulia also confirmed the same that hindus were not converted by sermons.
A concise report on what happened in the last millennia and just how hindus stopped the unstoppable force from overrunning them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
