Thread on next Mays London elections, why I won't vote for Shaun Bailey & why you should not vote Labour in London wide list
This is very early but it has been obvious for months that London is already being directly impacted by the election
e.g. arguments TfL funding, ULEZ &
1/
Hammersmith bridge
The government are having a go at Sadiq Khan hoping it helps Shaun Bailey + send messages to north England
Sadiq Khan is having a go at the government for a variety of reasons, some political & some legitimate in his role as Mayor
London caught in the middle
2/
Why not Shaun Bailey?
I like Shaun, I really wish he had been elected as an MP last December, Parliament is the right place for him
But I do not think he would make a good Mayor of London
That is almost entirely influenced by his campaign (or should I say lack of it)
If you
3/
cannot run a campaign effectively then that might suggest you might not be a good Mayor who has extensive executive responsibilities
As far as I know, he has only been to Tower Hamlets once in early 2019, I never met him
Rory Stewart came more often in his leadership campaign
4/
But nothing about his campaign since selected in 2018 makes me think either he or the Conservative Party actually expect him to win next May
There is a lot to criticise about Sadiq Khan's performance as Mayor but it is only partially being done by Shaun
5/
Is Sadiq Khan a great Mayor?
No, he is Ok. He has made some mistakes, but has learned to change his mind at least when he has to
Rotherhithe bridge & voting in estate regen, for example
He is too political & too tribal, other Labour Mayors have worked better with government
6/
where it is in their resident's interest
But whether you like him or not, polling suggests he will win next May (for a 3 year term due to election delay)
It is hard to see how Shaun or another contender could catch up in that time 7/
But reminder you are making three choices next May;
a. Mayor of London
b. Local member of the London Assembly for City & East, given this, is very strong Labour area I expect Unmesh Desai to win again (more later)
c. London wide list Assembly Members (cover whole of London)
8/
If Sadiq Khan wins then he needs strong scrutiny by the London Assembly, that is best done by non-Labour assembly members
They perform a similar role to me at a London wide level
If you vote for Sadiq Khan then in the London wide list you need to balance him with people who 9/
can scrutinise the Mayor effectively without tribal political concerns
That suggest Conservative, Green or Lib-Dem votes only in the London wide list
Unless you think a 2nd term Mayor Sadiq Khan needs no scrutiny?
So my aim will be to encourage differential voting next May
10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More evidence of financial reporting issues at @TowerHamletsNow
3 weeks at Cabinet we were told TH Council expected
£30.6 million of government support + they then confirmed verbally another £14 million received = £44.6m
But an FOI response said they had got £62.6 million 1/
But tonight on the agenda of the Health Board is an update on another £3.2 million of extra grants that we were told about in June. I was not aware of it until today.
+ £1.2 million for extra support over winter according to the Conservatives but cannot find any backup yet 2/
According to the Council 3 weeks ago total estimated cost of COVID to the Council for full-year £35.9 million
versus £62.6 million of grant income = what happened to the surplus £26.7 m?
Or does that include costs which Council does not include in £35.9m?
I am now confused 3/
"The scale of growth planned for the Isle of Dogs & South Poplar to 2041 poses a significant challenge for the delivery of water services infrastructure in the
area. Much of the existing infrastructure is close to, or already at capacity; and flood risk and water quality are 1/
key concerns in many parts of the area."
Summary from the Isle of Dogs and South Poplar Integrated Water Management Plan written by @AECOM , published 17 days ago that I only found after searching because I knew what it was called from asking Thames Water about it
Not 2/
informed about its publication by the GLA nor @TowerHamletsNow which is typical
Says water demand could increase by 55% by 2041 without mitigation
Production of this plan was recommended in 2017 & made public in May 2018, see pic
But not complete till Oct 20
Sense of urgency? 3/
Croydon Council effectively bankrupt
Have been issues for years, long before COVID & first serious signs of trouble date to 2017
Tower Hamlets Council in a much better position thanks in part because government more generous to us, business rates income from CW, development 1/
generating lots of CIL, S106 and especially New Homes Bonus from government (TH Council never mention this fact)
But where we are similar to Croydon is in our internal processes to spot issues like this
Big problems in our year end accounts & pensions spotted by new auditors +
2/
new temporary staff
I do not think Overview & Scrutiny nor Audit entirely fit for purpose here either & TH Council has failed to deliver its savings programmes
But more seriously has never been honest about is true financial position (always always governments fault)
Too few
3/
What happens to Mayor John Biggs if he wins/loses the Mayoral referendum 6th May?
By law within 28 days of referendum result need a special meeting on next step
Interesting to compare the Newham v Tower Council notes about what they say happens next if Mayoral model loses vote 1/
Newham says "If a referendum is held and votes for a change of governance arrangements, within 28 days of the poll date, the Council must pass a second resolution to implement the change in a Special Council Meeting held for this purpose." 2/
But Tower Hamlets says something a little different
"If a referendum is held ...the Council must pass a second resolution to implement the change in a Special Council
Meeting held for this purpose and if necessary transitional arrangements agreed"
What does transitional mean? 3/
Tower Hamlets often fills me with despair never more so then now
In a secret meeting Labour Cllrs vote to have a referendum next May between 2 choices:
Leader and Cabinet - rejected 10 years ago 60:40%
Directly elected Mayor
But clear that fear of Lutfur Rahman return has 1/
pushed Labour to try and get rid of the directly elected Mayor
So next years referendum will be a fight between Lutfur Rahman supporters in favour of the elected Mayor & Labour to get rid of it
Those of us who want better governance will get squeezed out because other options
2/
available were ignored namely;
Committee system - which Newham Labour Cllrs recently chose as their referendum option
Hybrid systems
It is not even clear which form of Leader and Cabinet model will be on offer - leader elected for 4 years or every year?
TH Labour are repeating
3/
For the record I would vote for Joe Biden if a US citizen
I do not like virtue signalling but Trump is different & it allows me to share this excellent article
Elements of the Trump programme as regards the economy & foreign policy are not terrible andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/healing-from…
1/
but in other areas they have been regressive & damaging
My main objections to him; 1. he does not take responsibility for his actions 2. he chooses to divide people, sometimes that is unavoidable but he does it for partisan advantage 3. his Covid response 4. incompetence
2/
5. that he does not take seriously the role of government 6. the lies
I like Biden, not convinced he is the solution but see pic
But he is not Trump & in the end that is key
Western democracies have to pick up their game as challenges mount, Trump incapable of doing that 3/