1/Decolonization and Growth: A brief thread.

Let's see how some large post-colonial nations are doing economically, compared to their former colonizers, since the 1960s.
2/First, Indonesia vs. Netherlands.

Indonesia is still at less than a quarter of the GDP per capita (PPP) of the Netherlands, and suffered a setback from the Asian Financial Crisis.

But it is steadily gaining.
3/Next up: India vs. the UK.

Similar story. India is still only about 1/7 as rich as the UK, but has been gaining steadily in the last two decades.
4/Bangladesh vs. UK.

Bangladesh actually *lost* ground for many decades, but recently has begun to turn things around. As of 2017 it was about 1/12 as rich as the UK.
5/Vietnam vs. France.

Similar story to India and Indonesia, but even more so. Vietnam is rapidly gaining on France, but is still only about 1/6 as rich.
6/Philippines vs. U.S.

The Philippines failed to gained ground relative to the U.S. for a long time, but a process of catch-up may now have finally begun. Philippines is still only about 1/7 as rich as the U.S.
7/South Korea vs. Japan.

This is the biggest decolonization success story. South Korea has almost completely caught up with Japan in economic terms. It started out a bit higher than others, but also its catch-up started much earlier, in the 70s.
8/Let's look at some earlier decolonizations.

Mexico has actually lost ground against Spain in recent decades. But it's about half as rich as Spain, so it's not doing too terribly in absolute terms.
9/Brazil vs. Portugal.

Similar story to Mexico vs. Spain here. Brazil is about half as rich as Portugal, but hasn't really made up any ground recently.
10/We can do a few more for the UK, since it has so many big ex-colonies.

Here's Nigeria vs. the UK. Nigeria is doing terribly, having lost a lot of ground, despite being only 1/10 as rich as the UK.
11/South Africa vs. UK.

South Africa lost a HUGE amount of ground in the 70s, going from about half as rich as the UK to barely more than 1/5 as rich. But now it appears to be holding steady.
12/I wanted to do Pakistan (and Algeria, for France), but oddly the data is missing in FRED.

Here's Argentina vs. Spain. Holding steady at about half. Similar story to Brazil/Portugal.
13/Here's Ghana vs. UK.

Ghana lost a ton of ground in the decades after decolonization, and is now only 1/10 as rich, but if you squint hard you might be able to see the beginnings of a catch-up process.
14/In general, we seem to see:

1. Recent rapid post-colonial catch-up from a very low base in South/SE Asia

2. Not much catch-up in Latin America; frozen at about 1/2 of colonizer income levels

3. Deterioration in Africa with recent stabilization at very low relative levels
15/All in all, the 21st century so far is looking more optimistic for post-colonial catch-up than the 20th century. But there is still a long way to go even in the places where catch-up is happening. And Africa hasn't really started yet...

(end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

18 Nov
Exit polls show Trump with significant gains among Asian voters this year (up +7 relative to 2016).

But exit polls are less reliable this year. Does anyone know of a county-level analysis that tries to get at this?

nytimes.com/interactive/20… Image
In Orange County at least, the Asian voter swing toward Trump seems to have been real.

Read 4 tweets
18 Nov
China's working-age population will hold roughly steady until about 2030, after which it will go into a steep decline. This is already baked into the demographic cake. Image
If a rapidly shrinking working-age population weakens a country significantly, then China has about one decade left in which to increase its geopolitical power before demographic pressures start to bite.

Which is one reason I'm kind of worried about the 2020s.
In the runup to WW1, Wilhelmine Germany was afraid that every day, Russia's power grew relative to Germany's. It was one reason they wanted a war -- to beat Russia before it got too strong.

Countries that feel like they're on the clock can be very dangerous.
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
It's hard for some supporters of student loan forgiveness to understand the antipathy toward the idea. But I think a lot of it is this: America has developed into a class society divided between college-educated and non-college classes, and student loans felt like an equalizer.
In other words, I think many people look at the college-educated class, who earn more then them, get more respect, have nicer jobs, have more job security, suffer less employment in recessions, etc., and think "well at least I don't have to pay off a bunch of student loans."
That's not to say I agree with this attitude or that I feel this feeling myself. I don't. I'm just trying to explain it.

What we actually need to do is compress this class society back into a middle-class one, raise wages, improve job security, reduce unemployment, etc.
Read 9 tweets
16 Nov
1/OK, thread of polls on expectations for progressive policies.

When do you expect the U.S. to enact M4A, or something like it?
2/Next poll:

When do you expect the U.S. to enact a Green New Deal worthy of the name?
3/Third poll:

When do you expect the U.S. to enact some form of reparations for Black Americans?
Read 7 tweets
14 Nov
I'm in the razor-thin group of annoying people who want to keep the Senate but get rid of the Electoral College.
The Senate gives disproportionate representation to low-population regions. I think that's fine up to a point. But the Electoral College reduces faith in democracy every time it actually matters; it's only OK when you don't notice it. Thus it's a pure negative for our society.
The filibuster should absolutely go, though.
Read 4 tweets
13 Nov
While I don't have a position on @Peter_Turchin's theories overall, I do think that the idea of reducing immigration in order to raise wages makes no sense. Data shows immigration has little effect on wages, and skilled immigration actually raises wages.

theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
If @Peter_Turchin wanted to make an anti-immigration argument, his "elite overproduction" thesis would be a more natural fit. He might argue that skilled immigration is displacing educated native-born Americans from the elite positions they had expected to inherit...
In fact, I think there is something to that argument. And I think it's a low-key, little-discussed reason why Dems will probably allow Trump's cuts in legal skilled immigration to stand...

Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!