Over the next hour I'll be watching a (sadly not public) congressional briefing featuring @RepJasonCrow on the important role of congressional offices in overseeing immigration detention. We're proud @immcouncil to join with other orgs to help facilitate this kind of briefing.
Representative Crow is talking about the ways he came to become the first member of Congress to have his office conduct weekly oversight visits of the Aurura Detention Center. "My job was to do oversight and accountability of federal facilities." cpr.org/2019/07/09/rep…
Rep. Crow says he was met in the lobby of the ICE detention center and refused entry three times, when he tried to conduct oversight. "Needless to say, that was the wrong response."
He then helped work to pass a law requiring ICE to allow Congressional oversight.
Rep. Crow says what's necessary for Congressional oversight of ICE detention is collaboration with local communities, a sustained commitment to oversight allowing for tracking trends over time, and "the bully pulpit"—so people know what's happening in their own communities.
Rep. Crow makes clear that Congressional oversight of ICE detention plays many functions, including basic oversight of taxpayer money, ensuring that the government is treating people properly and not violating peoples' rights, and tracking major public health issues during COVID.
Ending his remarks, Rep. Crow emphasizes that oversight of ICE detention won't change under the new administration, and he hopes other offices will see the value of inspections of ICE facilities.
In Q&A, Rep. Crow points out that conducting oversight at the Aurora Detention Center was made more difficult by the fact that it's run by a private prison company, not the federal government. State and local pressure has also been necessary to conduct meaningful oversight.
Now a person who was detained by ICE in a different location is talking about his story. He says he was diagnosed with high blood pressure at age 33 due to the stress of his detention. But he got no medicine. "Living in constant fear" of deportation was "a nightmarish maze."
Johannes, who was detained in Kentucky, notes how detention centers clean up. "before any Congressman come to a detention center, they usually fix many issues."
He said they knew a Congressional visit was going to happen because the jail suddenly began fixing broken lightbulbs.
However, even though jails fix things up before congressional visits, Johannes makes those visits DO make a difference for the people locked in detention.
Many people are ordered deported by an immigration judge but cannot BE deported. This is usually because their country of nationality will not take them.
For decades, these people have been able to get work permits, since they're not going anywhere. Now DHS wants to end that.
The proposal could affect tens of thousands of people who currently have these work permits, many of whom have lived in the United States for decades, working legally and paying taxes.
Every year, USCIS approves 20,000-30,000 of these work permit applications (inc. renewals).
Further update in USCIS's push to inject even more "discretion" into immigration benefit adjudications.
While these benefits have always *technically* required discretion, this administration has moved to codify and expand it in ways that will lead to more denials.
Today's update to the @USCIS Policy Manual adopts the Trump administration's general attitude that legal immigrants are only here on forbearance, with a status that can be taken away any time. Check out the new "Purpose" section.
Old New
The old language is still there, it's just now buried after the brand new section on "rights and responsibilities" of people on green cards, in which point number one notes that the status can be taken away—which is true, of course. But the choice of emphasis here is notable.
The new citizenship test reported on by @priscialva is now officially public. Citizenship applicants will now have to answer 12 of 20 questions right, up from 6 of 10.
This will inevitably lengthen the interview process and lead to fewer interviews a day.
As @priscialva reported, the new test shifts many questions towards broader principles.
For example, "What do we call the first ten amendments to the Constitution?" has been replaced with "What does the Bill of Rights protect?"
Old New
Some questions have been explicitly made harder. For example, "Name one branch or part of the government" has been replaced with "Name the three branches of government."
Notably, Senator-Elect Tuberville got this wrong yesterday
The Border Patrol already makes these numbers public once a year. It's not like these are any secret.
What they want to do is throw around numbers which are historically low, but because people don't have any context, they'll freak out about it. It's propaganda.
Importantly, we might expect an increase in reported "got aways" this year from the Border Patrol not because of more *people,* but because of more *data.*
The Border Patrol Chief wrote earlier this year that improved reporting of incidents will itself lead to an increase.
A month before he became the first President since 1992 to lose reelection, Donald Trump stood in front of a cheering crowd and declared that Biden would “turn Minnesota into a refugee camp.”
He went on to lose Minnesota by nearly 6 points more than 2016.