For the record, getting a tablet is an attempt to nudge myself into reading more papers. I'm hoping it will get me to one paper per day, but I am notoriously bad at predicting like every other member of the human race. 🤣
1/ Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Thaler, Sunstein)
"Small and apparently insignificant details (nudges) can impact people's behavior without forbidding any options or significantly changing economic incentives." (p. 6)
2/ "To count as a nudge, the intervention must be easy and cheap to avoid. Nudges are not mandates. Putting the fruit at eye level counts as a nudge. Banning junk food does not.
"The power of these small details comes from focusing people's attention in a particular direction.
3/ " “If a man sees a fly, he aims at it.” Kieboom, an economist, directs Schiphol’s building expansion. His staff conducted trials and found that etching images of house flies in urinals reduces urine spillage by 80%." (p. 4)
1/ Borrowing Fees and Expected Stock Returns (Hendrix, Crabb)
"Stocks with high borrowing fees tend to underperform their peers over the short term, but persistence of high borrowing fees is fast-decaying and not systematically predictable."
If you're in a disagreement with someone and he sends you links to research explaining his position and adding nuance, please don't ignore the e-mail and then continue with your original criticism.
Thanks very much!
</public service announcement>
(Although you may not realize it, criticizing and then ignoring the other person's perspective effectively makes the conversation one-sided, even though both people may appear to be continuing to talk.)
On a practical level, I think something like this happens whenever diversification-based approaches like risk parity and factors are brought up.
Those are automatically 'wrong' because there is only one valid approach (cap-weighted U.S. stocks with a sprinking of Treasuries.)
1/ Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction (Tetlock, Gardner)
"Foresight isn’t a mysterious gift bestowed at birth. It is the product of particular ways of thinking, of gathering information, of updating beliefs." (p. 18)
2/ "The news delivers forecasts without asking how good the forecasters really are. Corporations and governments pay for forecasts that may be prescient, worthless, or something in between. All of us make critical decisions based on forecasts whose quality is unknown." (p. 3)
3/ "Pundits are not on the news because they possess proven skill at forecasting. Old forecasts are like old news—soon forgotten. Pundits are not asked to reconcile what they said with what happened later.
"Talking heads are skilled at telling a compelling story with conviction.
"My brother bought silver coins at a premium of 20% over face value. It was an asymmetric risk trade: you could lose a maximum of 20%, but the upside was unlimited.
"By 1974, silver had more than tripled. My brother was driving around in a Mercedes-Benz." (p. 7)
3/ "Charts have become much less reliable. In the 1970s-80s, patterns were neat. There were fewer whipsaws. There weren’t a lot of people looking at charts.
"I think high-frequency trading creates volatility around breakout points. Markets are more mature, with bigger players.