Police & border force check SIS2 criminal database 600m of times a yr. @PoliceChiefs says loss has “major operational impact.” The fallback is to use Interpol but that requires manual data entry & includes far fewer people & objects - “it will be slower & lack capability”
On overseas criminal records, if we lose access to the ECRIS database @PoliceChiefs warn that it will take much longer to check records (up from 6 days to 66 days) “impacting on public protection”
On Passenger Name Records, @PoliceChiefs say “an inability to access PNR would have a major impact for counter terrorism and serious and organised crime related matters’”
On Europol, if no agreement, @NCA_UK say “the potential loss of access to Europol.. is the area we are most concerned about from a serious organised crime perspective.. the multilateral coordination & specialist analytical services can’t be replicated thru bilateral channels”
Prum covers automated searching of DNA & fingerprints. @PoliceChiefs say “it’s loss will have a major operational impact ... the UK has had over 12000 hits on DNA searched against 11 countries” They warn there’s no alternative if no deal & wd have to revert to manual requests
On the European Arrest Warrant they hope a negotiated agreement will deliver a version of the Norway/Iceland agreement tho they warn that without SIS2 it will still be “slower & more bureaucratic.” If there’s no agreement then we’re back to the v slow 1957 Extradition Convention
It is impossible to read these letters and then make any sense at all of Michael Gove’s claim a few weeks ago that we will somehow be able to “intensify security” in the event of no agreement. Theresa May’s face says it all.
Significant - & troubling - that the police now expect that there will be a downgrade in our security capability even if there is an agreement (eg loss of access to SIS2 which is used at border & on street). And contrary to Ministers, they are clear no agreement wd be much worse.
UK & EU face shared threats from cross border crime, terrorism, trafficking - it is in both sides interests for police to be able to get on with job of keeping us all safe. Govt should be honest about the security risks & make sure they get a strong security agreement in place
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I asked Minister for Future Borders & Immigration what future border security checks will be in Jan if we lose access to the SIS2 criminal database currently used to check everyone.
Neither Minister nor officials cd tell us /1
Govt says we’re likely to lose access to SIS2 for border checks in Jan
But also says they will exclude more foreign criminals
I asked how they plan to do that if they have no idea who they are
Minister says they’ll check the database
Back to my question. Which database? /2
It matters. Senior police officers tell us often how vital SIS2 is in finding/stopping serious criminals, terror suspects, sex offenders at the border & within UK. We check it 600m times pa. So if we’ll lose access to SIS2 in Jan, surely Govt has work underway on replacement? /3
2 senior civil servants gone over results fiasco but Gavin Williamson is still Education Secretary. Govt says he “sought assurances” it was all OK so it wasn’t his fault. What utter garbage. He was told what was wrong & he didn't sort it. This is his mess bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
This is the Education Sec who was told in advance that private schools were benefiting at the expense of state sixth forms yet he still went ahead. It’s in the Ofqual document he will have been sent and will have read before the results were published assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
This is the Education Sec who was told in advance that 30-50% of the A’level results were likely to be inaccurate with the algorithm, yet he still went ahead. Again, its in the Ofqual documents he will have been sent/have read before results were published
1/ New @CommonsHomeAffs report finds that Govt decision to have no quarantine/border measures in mid March increased pace & scale of the pandemic in UK so that many more people caught virus. Serious mistakes made. Lessons shd be learned on what went wrong committees.parliament.uk/publications/2…
2/ In Feb, UK had some quarantine for Wuhan & self isolation measures for places like Iran & Italy. But that wasn’t extended to Spain or France, wasn’t made compulsory & on 13 March self isolation guidance was removed completely. Those were serious errors telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/08/0…
3/ Just as other countries were introducing stronger border measures (quarantine, screening etc) in March the UK was lifting them & had no border measures in place for 3 months. Fact that UK approach was so different shd have rung alarm bells for Ministers bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
2. Only figure Home Sec had today was 0.5% - but that figure is not what it seems (It’s not an estimate of the proportion of people arriving in UK who have Covid)
And it also doesn’t appear to have changed since March 23rd despite the huge changes in the pandemic since then
3. Here’s my previous attempts earlier in the session to get to the bottom of it;
Q. how many people do you estimate are currently coming into UK with Covid 19?
A. We don’t have that figure, it is held elsewhere in Govt
I watched the Prime Minister’s press conference in despair. In a public health emergency communication and information saves lives. Yet time & again the Government keeps failing to push out a strong clear message to everyone. For all our sakes they urgently need to get a grip.
In a national emergency when lives depend on it the Prime Minister needs to ensure that strong, clear messages reach everyone on what they MUST NOW DO given the sheer gravity of what we face because we have a collective responsibility to save lives
Instead at the press conference the Prime Minister encouraged people to “follow the advice on social distancing.”
To have such a senior public servant taking court action like this against one of the great offices of state shows a shocking level of breakdown in the normal functioning of government. For the Home Secretary & Prime Minister to allow things to reach this point is appalling ...
The allegations made by Sir Philip Rutnam are immensely serious & it reflects extremely badly on the Government not just on the Home Office that these have not already been investigated, addressed & resolved ....
The PM & the Cabinet Secretary cannot just let this drift & wait many months until an Employment Tribunal gets to the bottom of this. We can’t have a dysfunctional & distracted Home Office at a time of rising violent crime, important legislation & Brexit security negotiations ...