The Dem student loan forgiveness scheme would turn higher education into an even worse example of Chumponomics: a system that relies on chumps who pay full freight to subsidize those who don't.
Chumponomics is essentially stealth socialism, and it's usually a prelude to open socialism. Socialists deliberately create a crisis of unfairness, then insist their ideology is the only way to resolve it. They did it with health insurance, and they'll do it with student loans.
Open borders immigration policy is a great example of Chumponomics. The people who worked hard and followed all the rules to immigrate legally - investing a great deal of their time, which has a hefty monetary value - get screwed as illegals are waved into the country.
The student loan scheme would be one of the hardest, sharpest, shiniest examples of Chumponomics to date. Everyone who worked hard to pay off their loans, or worked hard at a job that didn't require college, gets screwed fast and hard to pay off the debts of others.
The people getting the shaft made major life decisions based around the cost of their education. Some might have chosen not to attend college due to the cost, or chose a less expensive school. Graduates made tough choices and worked hard to pay off huge student loans.
For many of those people, the opportunity cost of responsibly accepting and satisfying their student loan debt - or choosing not incur such debt by not going to college - far exceeds the cash value of the proposed giveaway - i.e. they're getting screwed even worse than it looks.
Socialists artificially exacerbated the student loan process by creating conditions in which loans would be inflated as the cost of education absolutely skyrocketed. There aren't many goods on Earth whose cost inflated faster than university tuition over the past decade.
One of the most important instruments for engineering this disaster was Obamacare, which included provisions for inflating and weaponizing student loan debt. Obamacare lit the fuse on a fiscal bomb that would leave generations buried in the rubble of student loan debt.
Dems use student loans much the same way Communist China uses its Belt and Road infrastructure scheme as a debt trap. The marks - Third World nations for Chinese imperialists, U.S. students for Dems - are enticed into taking out huge loans that become leverage to control them.
The only "solutions" Dems will accept for a crisis created by Chumponomics are socialist schemes that increase their own power and conceal the screw job, rather than addressing it. The unfair costs and wealth transfers get folded into the great grey sludge of socialist taxation.
You don't think it's fair that you played by the rules and paid your debt, while these other people get huge subsidies or a free ride? Obviously the only solution is to fully socialize the situation so the goods become "free" and no one feels the pain of paying for them.
The Left is very good at creating and exacerbating problems, then selling itself as the only "solution." In fact, every drop of power leftists are given over anything will almost certainly be used to make it worse, to create opportunities for the Left to harvest power and money.
They've rarely been more aggressive about using this tactic than with higher education and health care. The latter is the bigger prize, but student loans are a useful crowbar for widening class divisions that can be exploited for political and monetary gain.
The important thing is to make people feel aggrieved and exploited, so the Left can swoop in as the snake-oil salesmen of "fairness," "justice," and "equality." They want to make free choice seem dangerous, surrounded by predators and pitfalls, so we'll let them manage our lives.
Chumponomics systems are a great way to nourish feelings of both entitlement and resentment - to corrupt a free and reasonable system until it becomes so unreasonable, so "broken," that centralized socialist control can be marketed as the only way to "reform" the system. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
None of the restrictions on speech and other freedoms imposed in the name of fighting the coronavirus will go away when the pandemic subsides. They will be repurposed to serve other items on the elite agenda, which we'll be told are every bit as serious as Covid-19 was.
Old and busted: "This left-wing cause is the moral equivalent of war!"
New hotness: "This left-wing cause is the moral equivalent of the coronavirus!"
"Just as Americans came together and made great sacrifices to defeat Covid-19, so we must now come together and save our beloved planet from the pandemic of climate change."
One of the worst contradictions of our debased republic is that we loudly insist voting is sacred, but we treat the actual ballots like toilet paper: Third World election systems, rampant fraud, clown-show counts and audits, election rules that keep getting looser.
You can't have it both ways. You can't insist voting is such a sacred privilege that it overrides every other consideration, while also treating the votes themselves as worthless junk - protected and counted far less assiduously than every state tracks its weekly lottery tickets.
If voting is a serious business, then it MUST be taken seriously, by both election officials and voters. That means firm rules and real effort for both casting AND counting the votes. Voting must be treated as a solemn duty, not an Internet poll to judge the cutest cat photo.
It might seem odd for a totalitarian socialist movement to run with slogans like "Abolish the Police," but it's perfectly consistent with their worldview. They despise the legitimate functions of limited government because they saddle the State with duties to sovereign citizens.
It's no coincidence that people who want to radically expand the size, power, and funding of our already titanic central government usually take a dim view of the things our constitutionally-limited federal system is SUPPOSED to be doing.
A government with sworn duties to all of its citizens is limited in power, especially if those duties take precedence over all the big plans socialists wish to impose through coercive force. Socialism requires unequal treatment by definition. It cannot function otherwise.
I remember warning at the outset that on a long enough timeline, every crisis becomes a religion. The Church of Covid is fully up and running, complete with heaven-and-hell mythology, devotional practices, and papal indulgences for elites and events with the correct politics.
Beneath all the politics and myth-making lies the simple idea that masks probably help a little, and if they help a little - plus giving people a little psychological comfort in a time of great crisis - they're worth using. If it ended there, we'd be having a rational discussion.
But masks were politicized in the worst possible way, and reason went out the window as a political-religious movement formed around the Wuhan coronavirus. It's easy to see why people fell for it. They desperately wanted to believe they could do SOMETHING to gain control.
Al Gore conceded on Dec 13, 2000. The media treated him as a hero, a great statesman doing one last service for the country he loved so much by gracefully accepting that his challenges would not succeed.
Golly gee, I wonder if they'd give Trump the same coverage on Dec 13 2020.
You young'uns who weren't around for 2000 are probably getting a hilariously cooked and slanted media perspective on what actually happened. Gore, his lawyers, his party, and DNC Media fought bitterly to steal Florida. It was scorched earth.
The media was doing emergency crisis news shows, interviewing people who tearfully swore they meant to vote for Gore, pinky swear, but their poor little heads were twisted all around by those confusing (Democrat-designed) ballots. They were treated like martyrs by the media.
Leaving aside the question of how many might be fraudulent - there's no way ALL of them are - the number of Biden-only ballots combined with huge GOP success downballot makes it pretty clear this election was a thumbs-down referendum on Trump, just as the Democrats wanted.
There's no other way to interpret such a clear signal from voters, and it's not terribly surprising. The coronavirus was a crisis that could take down even the strongest incumbent. It's remarkable Trump did as well as he did - another signal that should not be overlooked.
Mail-in balloting made it incredibly easy for people to take out their anger against the incumbent by filling in a bubble and dropping an envelope in the mail. They were coached and harvested to do so. The outcome is only surprising in that Trump came as close as he did.