One of the worst contradictions of our debased republic is that we loudly insist voting is sacred, but we treat the actual ballots like toilet paper: Third World election systems, rampant fraud, clown-show counts and audits, election rules that keep getting looser.
You can't have it both ways. You can't insist voting is such a sacred privilege that it overrides every other consideration, while also treating the votes themselves as worthless junk - protected and counted far less assiduously than every state tracks its weekly lottery tickets.
If voting is a serious business, then it MUST be taken seriously, by both election officials and voters. That means firm rules and real effort for both casting AND counting the votes. Voting must be treated as a solemn duty, not an Internet poll to judge the cutest cat photo.
Voting was made almost as easy as tweeting in the last election, and the ballots were fed into big-city election machines that have been sloppy and outright corrupt for generations. It's not surprising the result was an indefensible disaster.
"You get what you pay for," the old saying goes. That applies to the amount of reverence and effort we put into activities like voting. Take it seriously and voters will rise to the occasion. Treat it like a joke and it becomes a punchline.
Americans have been bullied and cajoled into thinking their vote every two years - and really their presidential vote every four - is the only say they really have, or need, over how their lives are managed. It's an inevitable result of radically expanding government power.
We complain about how much money is poured into elections (well, the media mostly complains about it when Republicans win after spending a lot of money.) We bemoan the influence of special interests. That stuff only happens because power is so incredibly valuable now.
"It can't be a dictatorship if we get to vote the bums out," right? We've largely accepted that elections are the only necessary limit on power. The Constitution is a "living document," don't you know. The only real limit is that our leaders supposedly fear the vote.
And yet, when it comes time to actually vote, look at the idiotic circus that ensues. Look at all the loose rules loosened even further at the last minute. Look at the new idea that people shouldn't even be expected to leave their houses to cast their sacred ballots.
Whether or not those vast troves of Biden-only ballots are fraudulent, they're a national embarrassment. People who didn't care enough about their "sacred vote" to learn about any other candidates or ponder any issues filled out one bubble and dumped them in the mail.
If you treat voting like filling out the comment card at a restaurant with low marks because your burger was undercooked, don't be surprised that you end up with garbage government run by a greedy and inept ruling class. You allowed voting to become a joke. The joke's on you.
One of the big stories of the 2020 election is that it was dominated by people who treated voters like sheep to be fleeced, harvesting ballots like they were sowing wheat. They didn't waste time on persuading anybody. They just raked in ballots from people who didn't give a damn.
Stop acting like voting is sacred if you're not prepared to take it seriously. Stop acting like it's a bastion against tyranny if you treat it like a circus sideshow. Voting is either a drama or a farce. Pick one, knowing those hungry for power greatly prefer the farce. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's entirely reasonable to say Trump's election lawyers need to produce hard evidence to back up their sweeping allegations, PDQ.
It's absurd to expect them to do it live on a talk show, as if they were carrying Marsellus Wallace's magic glowing briefcase from Pulp Fiction.
Host: You say thousands of votes were switched by corrupt computer software. You need to prove it.
Sidney Powell: Of course. I have the proof right here.
[opens briefcase, golden light spills out]
Host: Is that...?
Powell: Yes.
Host: Wow. OK, you win. I'm sold.
There is no way the "evidence" of the most serious claims is something that can be dangled in front of cameras. There is no way that attempting to do so would convince anyone, nor should it. The evidence will be extensively evaluated by experts and presented to judges.
None of the restrictions on speech and other freedoms imposed in the name of fighting the coronavirus will go away when the pandemic subsides. They will be repurposed to serve other items on the elite agenda, which we'll be told are every bit as serious as Covid-19 was.
Old and busted: "This left-wing cause is the moral equivalent of war!"
New hotness: "This left-wing cause is the moral equivalent of the coronavirus!"
"Just as Americans came together and made great sacrifices to defeat Covid-19, so we must now come together and save our beloved planet from the pandemic of climate change."
The Dem student loan forgiveness scheme would turn higher education into an even worse example of Chumponomics: a system that relies on chumps who pay full freight to subsidize those who don't.
Chumponomics is essentially stealth socialism, and it's usually a prelude to open socialism. Socialists deliberately create a crisis of unfairness, then insist their ideology is the only way to resolve it. They did it with health insurance, and they'll do it with student loans.
Open borders immigration policy is a great example of Chumponomics. The people who worked hard and followed all the rules to immigrate legally - investing a great deal of their time, which has a hefty monetary value - get screwed as illegals are waved into the country.
It might seem odd for a totalitarian socialist movement to run with slogans like "Abolish the Police," but it's perfectly consistent with their worldview. They despise the legitimate functions of limited government because they saddle the State with duties to sovereign citizens.
It's no coincidence that people who want to radically expand the size, power, and funding of our already titanic central government usually take a dim view of the things our constitutionally-limited federal system is SUPPOSED to be doing.
A government with sworn duties to all of its citizens is limited in power, especially if those duties take precedence over all the big plans socialists wish to impose through coercive force. Socialism requires unequal treatment by definition. It cannot function otherwise.
I remember warning at the outset that on a long enough timeline, every crisis becomes a religion. The Church of Covid is fully up and running, complete with heaven-and-hell mythology, devotional practices, and papal indulgences for elites and events with the correct politics.
Beneath all the politics and myth-making lies the simple idea that masks probably help a little, and if they help a little - plus giving people a little psychological comfort in a time of great crisis - they're worth using. If it ended there, we'd be having a rational discussion.
But masks were politicized in the worst possible way, and reason went out the window as a political-religious movement formed around the Wuhan coronavirus. It's easy to see why people fell for it. They desperately wanted to believe they could do SOMETHING to gain control.
Al Gore conceded on Dec 13, 2000. The media treated him as a hero, a great statesman doing one last service for the country he loved so much by gracefully accepting that his challenges would not succeed.
Golly gee, I wonder if they'd give Trump the same coverage on Dec 13 2020.
You young'uns who weren't around for 2000 are probably getting a hilariously cooked and slanted media perspective on what actually happened. Gore, his lawyers, his party, and DNC Media fought bitterly to steal Florida. It was scorched earth.
The media was doing emergency crisis news shows, interviewing people who tearfully swore they meant to vote for Gore, pinky swear, but their poor little heads were twisted all around by those confusing (Democrat-designed) ballots. They were treated like martyrs by the media.