THREAD (1/7) Quick take on 10 point green plan: Serious set of net zero commitments that show PM wants to make his record on green jobs central to the Tory platform at the next election. Further detail will be needed on delivery, but this is an important step-forward on net zero.
(2/7): Ambitious targets for key tech fits the way PM operates (e.g. mass testing) – set a demanding goal that will require huge changes to deliver. Clear that this approach can work (offshore wind). 2030 commitment to phase out ICE vehicles was unthinkable just a few years ago.
(3/7): To support new deployment targets, PM has announced significant new public funding in a number of areas to drive forward more rapid progress (CCUS, hydrogen, batteries). While some will argue the ££ isn’t enough, its a serious down payment when fiscal backdrop v tough.
(4/7): Particularly good news that the focus is on technologies where the UK can seize the economic edge. Major commitments on advanced nuclear, hydrogen and clean transport will mean ££ being channelled to key regions across the country, including key to levelling-up agenda.
(5/7): But now comes the hard bit. Political reaction to the plan will focus on levels of public investment, ultimately it will be for the private sector to deliver climate action. Focus must now turn to mobilising investment to deliver multi-billion pound projects by 2030.
(6/7): While the plan starts to get into the trickier bits of net zero, such as decarbonising homes, it doesn’t solve the challenge of how to create compelling offers that consumers will actually want. There are also a few notable gaps, such as carbon pricing and flexible power.
(7/7): But the detail can come in due course. Must see today for what it is – PM laying out the broad building blocks of his net zero strategy (hydrogen, nuclear, offshore wind) that if implemented well, stand to create thousands of green jobs and help position UK before COP26.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Buckland

Josh Buckland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbuckland13

16 Nov
THREAD: Given the Prime Minister will shortly publish his long-awaited 10-point green plan, I thought I would set out what I would have recommended he did if I was still in No10. Lots no doubt missing, but hopefully ambitious, while still being politically possible.
#1 Net Zero power supplies: Given importance of electrification, set a bold date to completely decarbonise (more or less) electricity. Could be 2040, or even earlier. Should also set out 10-year ‘Acceleration Plan’ for bringing forward non-commercial tech (e.g., floating wind).
#2 Redo the wiring: Given need to decarbonise the whole economy, need to stop thinking fuel by fuel. Create an independent ‘Net Zero Energy Agency’ that identifies what is required, then uses power of markets to deliver it, while also bringing forward strategic tech (e.g. CCUS).
Read 11 tweets
21 Sep
Really useful report from @zeroc_official on the need for a more comprehensive approach to carbon pricing to achieve net zero. Some controversial bits, but helps to move the debate forward in a critical year as UK sets new approach to carbon pricing post-Brexit. Three key bits:
(1) Approach to carbon pricing too patchy (a point well made by (@EnergySysCat), with the cost varying hugely across (and within) different sectors. Govt should commit to an overall price target and work out how best to deliver it in each sector. Image
(2) Governance is key to ensure that businesses and individuals have confidence to invest in low-carbon solutions. Should be a mixture of contractual and legislative constraints that ensure lock-in politically and commercially. Image
Read 4 tweets
29 Jun
Great report out today on my favourite subject - carbon pricing. Led by the excellent @racheljanetwolf. It's ambitious to say the least, but in a politically charged area we need the boldness to inch towards a coherent regime that drives investment. 3 things jumped out to me...
1: The mixed signals in the power sector need to be fixed. The UK ETS won't quite do it, but there is finally an opportunity to create a more definable (and investable) single price. The idea to utilise it to help cut subsidy costs is a good one.
2. The idea of biting the bullet on pricing domestic gas is clearly becoming more mainstream which is good news. My only point of caution would be on timeframe. Surely better to implement low at first, then increase as low-carbon heat alternatives fall in cost?
Read 4 tweets
3 Jun
Given today's focus on #Treasury delivering a #GreenRecovery, here's a short thread on the 5 things I would be advising the Chancellor to do if I was still there. As an ex-Treasury official there will be too few ££s for some, but hopefully still ambitious.
thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/c…
#1 Dig what’s shovel ready: Target precious public funds at the things that will actually spark economic activity now. Focus should be on immediately deployable technologies, like energy efficiency measures, heat-pumps and EVs (not a diesel scrappage scheme).
#2 Try before you buy: In areas where strategic case not settled, announce series of large-scale pilots in regions where economic activity is most impacted by pandemic. Major hydrogen trials and industrial decarbonisation in key clusters are low-regret and politically attractive.
Read 6 tweets
1 Jun
Just catching up with @beisgovuk future UK carbon pricing document. A few brief thoughts on an approach which while not quite ground-breaking at this stage, could yet set the gold standard on carbon pricing internationally ahead of #COP26. (1/7)
gov.uk/government/new…
The name of the game is getting a scheme up and running as soon as possible. Design is as close to EU ETS as its defendable to ensure transition is smooth for businesses. Will be unpopular with some who see it as a missed opportunity. (2/7)
Still significant implementation challenges in getting the scheme going by end of year, meaning the option of a carbon tax is left open. But language is now clearly in favour of UK ETS, with tax as last resort. Good news. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!