"We’re in the Viking Funeral phase of the Trump presidency right now," I said on @KennedyNation's program Nov. 5. "You have his sons out there trying to...enforce message discipline on wayward Nikki Haleys of the world for being insufficiently insane.." 1/ finance.yahoo.com/video/trumps-c…
I usually don't talk like this, least not sober and in non-@wethefifth venues. But the self-beclowning of the GOP in the face of a conspiracy theorist president talking and acting nonsense these past weeks has been spectacular, and worth saddling onto the enablers.
More from Nov. 5: "And we tend to look away, because it gets tiresome, but the president today in his speech; that is not the speech of an adult. And he’s going to be doing this the next several weeks as they challenge—and I think increasingly, like today, lose—in court."
You people out there cheering this on are a major part of why this is happening. Those of you who say, "But what about Stacey Abrams not conceding," or "What about Dems blaming 2016 on Russia/Facebook/whatever," are demonstrating the vacuousness of most applied whataboutism.
Which is to say, the lesson to be learned about the Other Guy's craziness should be: Don't be crazy. It's like Trump's response to family-separation, blaming it on Obama/Biden--like, just choose whether the thing is good or bad, and act accordingly, is the thing grownups do.
As I said on tonight's @KennedyNation, the single greatest advertisement for Democrats in Georgia is watching Republicans conspiracy-monger against the GOP secretary of state, because they're terrified of Trump voters. How pathetic, in every way.
(Please don't misinterpret that as an endorsement of said Democrats, FWIW.)

Anyway, I do not say any of this in a spirit of piling on, or of yelling "Score-board!" I say it because this fantasia is more than just unseemly, it's unhealthy. You need to snap out of it.
I say this after spending the last 4 years objecting to the formulation of "interfering with the election" to describe 2016. Dem voters claiming a pure asymmetry on conspiratorial nonsense are flattering themselves. Things are gonna be bad for a while; it's up to us to improve.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Welch

Matt Welch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MattWelch

17 Nov
Stuck on this sentence:

"Publishers and media scholars said that while these gifts provide a measure of financial stability, they can also cost an outlet its editorial independence — or the perception of independence."

nytimes.com/2020/11/17/us/…
Like, the history of organizing political opinion publications as nonprofits, or money-losing playthings of the rich, is not some odd or newfangled phenomenon, requiring a team of outside forensic scientists to decipher (and cast aspersions on).

reason.com/2012/03/12/fac…
Cultural/political/media nonprofits are hatched every day, and have been with us for many scores of years. The key is how they are organized--the Mission, the governance structure of the Board, the funding streams & diversity thereof. These aren't secrets.
reason.com/2014/12/05/don…
Read 4 tweets
29 Aug
In July 1989, the best new movie, album, and song all hailed from, and took as subject matter, the great, tumultuous, fascinating, and super-violent (in 2020 standards) city of New York. Come with me on a journey of rambunctious music released that month. open.spotify.com/playlist/1mzGM…
There’s cop violence, black consciousness, hypocritical preachers, rising anti-Semitism, radical Islam, CIA plots, some occasional hippie counter-programming, and civilizational collapse. In other words, July 1989 is pretty interesting to listen to in August 2020.
I’ve been marching through the musical months of 1989 for our mutual edification. Enjoy!
June: open.spotify.com/playlist/3vOaB…
May: open.spotify.com/playlist/3Pect…
April: open.spotify.com/playlist/4l5rA…
March: open.spotify.com/playlist/1L6R1…
February: open.spotify.com/playlist/1EyDU…
January: open.spotify.com/playlist/4Yz10…
Read 8 tweets
9 Jun
When Radley tweeted this, I hadn’t read Margaret Sullivan’s piece, and was in the middle of my usual Monday madness. I now have a bit of time, so will talk a bit about why I don’t like it.
washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/medi…
The hinge of her argument comes in two parts. 1) “The core question is this: In this polarized, dangerous moment, what are journalists supposed to be?”

Flatly asserting what “the core question” of any given topic is, rather than explaining how you arrived there, is a tell.
2) “Pose that question to most members of the public, and you might get an answer something like this: ‘Just tell me the bare facts. Leave your interpretation out of it. And don’t be on anyone’s side.’”

That is an unconvincing strawman, as indicated by most/might/something.
Read 13 tweets
30 Jun 19
I am going to make a thread of some recentish writings of mine, that feel at least tangentially related to some of the rancid conversations on this website today (and maybe every day).
My last pre-2016-election @Reason column was a lament for the “alarming resurgence of that foul and dangerous defect of judgment known as collectivism,” by which I meant negative collective generalizations about huge blocs of disparate people. reason.com/2016/11/05/the…
Confronting/ostracizing people for their political and workplace affiliations, I argued in Nov. 2018, leads not just to individual injustices (like what’s happened with @KatTimpf), but on a macro level a switch to a low-trust society. And that’s ominous. reason.com/2018/11/23/don…
Read 11 tweets
2 Mar 19
Noticing a lot of Strange New Respect for @JustinAmash this week, based on his non-clownish questioning of Michael Cohen and opposition to Trump's emergency-declaration on the border. @Reason has for years been covering/interviewing Amash closely; thought I’d share some of it.
Here’s Amash laying out some pretty specific ideas six weeks ago to @kmanguward about what kind of candidate the Libertarian Party (@LPNational) should nominate for president in 2020. (Hint: someone more like Amash than, say, @GovBillWeld.) reason.com/blog/2019/01/2…
Reminder: Amash recently proposed a bill that would slow down any federal government eminent domain seizures along the southern border (or anywhere else): reason.com/blog/2019/01/1…
Read 12 tweets
15 Feb 19
It’s happening dot gif.
I will make the previous post the beginning of a thread about @GovBillWeld's announcement today at Politics & Eggs that he's forming an exploratory committee to primary @realDonaldTrump. My backgrounder from yesterday here: reason.com/blog/2019/02/1…
"I'm here actually because I think our country is in grave peril." -- @GovBillWeld talking now.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!