There's a lot of talk about time pressure +who that benefits. The EU has more onerous ratification obligations than the UK, eg the European Parliament will have to ratify the week beginning Dec 14 (the UK gov has more discretion)
2/ As has been widely discussed, the EP typically needs 4 wks to run it through its committees (no fewer than 11 cttees scrutinised the WA); there's the legal scrubbing, and translation into 23 languages by lawyer-linguists.
3/ However the EU is shifting strategy, going for "patience" and finding legal solutions to remove any time pressure caused by all the procedures. This cd include Provisional Application of parts of a deal from Jan 1, but that's regarded as "messy" and would only gain a few weeks
4/ The bigger determination seems to be to let the UK be the ones to pull the plug. This wd be on the basis that the EU is better placed to weather the storm of No Deal than the UK.
5/ Yes, parts of the EU would be badly hit - not least Ireland, but also Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, parts of France etc. The calculation is that these constituencies will be supported financially, and in the time the UK will have to come back to the table next year.
6/ Ones source says: “The timing on both sides is an issue but we are not going to be the ones to pull the plug + say we're not moving forward anymore. The pressure is more on the UK. At the end of the day we still have the single market, we still have the Withdrawal Agreement.”
7/ This attitude is most accurately reflected in the comments by EU trade commission @VDombrovskis yesterday. “We actually have seen many deadlines to come and go. But there is one deadline which will not be able to move, which is Jan 1 next year when the transition period ends.”
8/ All this is against the backdrop of no real movement on the big issues: level playing field, fisheries and governance.
9/ The EU seems to be determined not to move on LPF, which is a fundamental issue. From the sovereignty argument, it is, of course, a fundamental issue for the UK as well.
10/ If a breakthrough is achieved on LPF/Governance, then fisheries will likely be a classic numbers, hard bargaining, last minute negotiation, which may even involve @vonderleyen@BorisJohnson
11/ But the EU appears to be calculating that the UK won't move in its direction on LPF, and so is prepared to wait it out, even if that means time really does run out and we're in a No Deal situation.
12/ EU leaders will meet by videoconference this afternoon on Covid. Brexit is not on the agenda. Some leaders may raise the issue of No Deal contingency planning, but the Commission believes an awful lot of work was done last yr ahead of 2 No deal deadlines
13/ Once source says that if any contingency measures are published in the coming days they will be "limited"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New: Member states have been told by the European Commission that 95pc of the EU-UK future relationship treaty has been completed, but that wide gaps remain on the three key issues of the level playing field, governance and fisheries
2/ This came during a briefing of EU ambassadors this morning by the sec gen of the European Commission Ilze Juhansone, standing in for Michel Barnier
3/ Although 95pc complete, there are square brackets in key areas of the text, meaning bits that remain open and that are linked to an overall deal. These are in the field of energy, road haulage, aviation, rules of origin
If you’re wondering about the UK Parliament’s role in ratifying the EU-UK future relationship treaty, there’s a handy guide here from the House of Commons Library commonslibrary.parliament.uk/uk-parliaments…
2/ But to save you the trouble, I’ve summarised it here.
3/ Firstly, it’s the UK govt, not parliament, which negotiates a treaty under its prerogative power. These powers are subject to some constraints. The Constitutional Reform & Governance Act (CRAG) gives parliament a limited role in ratifying treaties
Here's an update ahead of the Brexit negotiations resuming in Brussels:
1/ The main obstacles remain fisheries, the level playing field and governance. The big sticking point has shifted to the so-called evolution or "ratchet" clauses in the non-regression provisions, ie that both sides evolve their standards in tandem over time...
2/ In particular the UK is resisting the ability for either side to retaliate if they depart from the level playing field. The fact that the "baseline" remains the standards both sides operate on Jan 1 - ie, EU-level standards, also remains an issue for London.
Some important advice from John O'Loughlin of @PwC ahead of January 1 2021 during a webcast alongside @GavinBarwell@carinbryans and @mcgeedavid. Basically any Irish companies which export to the UK or import from the UK should know the following:
2/ "At a minimum you need a EORI number, the equivalent of a VAT number, you need that to lodge a customs declaration. The people that lodge a customs declaration aren’t the company themselves nor is it someone like PWC, but it’s a customs agent...
3/ "They file and prepare the documentation..., you need to engage the services of a customs broker, have a mechanism to pay the customs duty and the right information and documentation to support tthe importation of those goods.
Response from European Commission spokes @DanielFerrie to the joint letter from @DUPleader and @moneillsf on food consignments to NI supermarkets under the NI Protocol:
2/ “We can confirm receipt of a letter from the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland on the issue of agri-food goods brought into Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. We will reply to this letter shortly.
3/ “The Withdrawal Agreement’s Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland prevents the return of a hard border on the island of Ireland. It protects peace, stability and prosperity, North-South cooperation and the integrity of the EU Single Market.
Breaking: The DUP and Sinn Fein leaders have sent a joint letter to the European Commission describing as “unacceptable” the alleged threat to the continuity of existing food supplies to Northern supermarkets once the Northern Ireland Protocol takes effect.
2/ The letter, seen by @rtenews, and signed by @DUPleader and @moneillsf, highlights the problem of the need for checks and controls on food products entering Northern Ireland from Great Britain from January 1 and how that might impact on the supply of food to supermarket chains.
3/ The First/Dep First Ministers write: “It is hard to imagine a more fundamental aspect of everyday life than the purchase of daily food supplies...