Tweet

David Henig

19 Nov, 12 tweets, 4 min read

https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1329401467116130311

No progress to report as it seems both EU and UK prefer a staring contest. Dereliction of duty of both EU and UK leaving business hanging in this way.

https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1329401467116130311

https://twitter.com/MichelBarnier/status/1329429958066925570

On one level, c'est la vie.

On another, who the hell thought it was a good idea to still be intensively negotiating a major trade relationship only 6 weeks before current free flowing arrangements expire at the height of a pandemic?

https://twitter.com/MichelBarnier/status/1329429958066925570

https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1329433048711041026

I mean, y'know, if only someone had thought of the idea that we might need more time for negotiations because of Covid

https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1329433048711041026

https://twitter.com/WJames_Reuters/status/1329436106153189379

OTOH, perhaps this is the opportunity for the breakthrough we've needed, trade negotiations meet Big Brother...

https://twitter.com/WJames_Reuters/status/1329436106153189379

https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1329439419028414470

As a kind follower points out, this doesn't actually stop the PM saying deal, and we can sort the exact detail out later. It is after all the PM's decision we mostly await (and which the EU are starting to think is unlikely to come)

https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1329439419028414470

We could even borrow the precedent of the EU-Canada Free Trade Agreement and announce a deal has been agreed five times

(in truth I lost count, it was somewhere between four and seven announcements over a couple of years I think).

Look, the basics of this deal aren't changing if we wait a day or five years. So how about both sides agree to sign now and spend five years deciding if they were right rather than the other way round? A few million businesses, plus a few Brexit geeks, will thank both sides.

https://twitter.com/bernardjenkin/status/1329475270311612420

Noticeable in the last couple of weeks the number of Conservative MPs calling explicitly or not for no-deal with the EU. Some you can imagine the PM being comfortable to ignore. Others less so. But this is currently only going that way.

https://twitter.com/bernardjenkin/status/1329475270311612420

Very important to understand the (implicit) reasoning of no-deal tory MPs. It is that the EU can never be trusted not to attempt to subjugate the UK by regulation therefore the same clauses that may be acceptable with Japan or US can't be with the EU.

Hence why an FTA with the EU is always going to involve a breach between the PM and at least some Conservative MPs. Others could probably be persuaded by how weak FTA clauses are in reality, but not after government equated such clauses with loss of sovereignty.

Sorry, but the deal v no deal question always came down to whether the PM would be prepared to break with some of his own backbenchers. And right now I can't see it. The alternative, that they will be happy with an EU FTA, seems to be extremely improbable. But we still wait.

https://twitter.com/AgnelloFabrizio/status/1329487777382199308

And this is one reason why the EU can't or won't compromise on LPF.

https://twitter.com/AgnelloFabrizio/status/1329487777382199308

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @DavidHenigUK

David Henig

@DavidHenigUK

20 Nov

https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1329896250800566275

Unless the reason for that optimism is an indication directly from the PM that he intends to make concessions to get a deal it is no more than wishful thinking. Important we understand the code of these things.

https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1329896250800566275

Sorry to be a bore but it isn't just the UK EU deal. To get the Japan deal the UK seems to have had to give up some access to agriculture quotas in return for future promises. It looks like a Canada deal will also need a UK concession. All normal.

Two things have changed in UK EU talks since June. General agreement on most issues has turned to text, and the Internal Market Bill has been added to the list of fundamental problems, along with fish, level playing field, governance. 95% was always uncontroversial.

Read 6 tweets

David Henig

@DavidHenigUK

20 Nov

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1329722507734228993

I suspect it is four. Level Playing Field, governance / disputes, fish, and Northern Ireland Internal Market Bill, though latter is being handled in different discussions. Basically not much changed in six months.

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1329722507734228993

https://twitter.com/Beaking_News/status/1329727208252911616

Never enjoyed the doublespeak of trade negotiations. Negotiators can agree smallprint. That isn't momentum. Politicians making difficult decisions is key. "if there is political will" says they still aren't, yet.

https://twitter.com/Beaking_News/status/1329727208252911616

So just to emphasise. "Momentum" in trade negotiations is quite like "ambition". Nice sounding words that don't mean what they seem. Momentum means talks have not broken down, like ambition means the usual text.

It seems EU-UK talks have made no noticeable progress this week.

Read 9 tweets

David Henig

@DavidHenigUK

19 Nov

https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1329511799171985409

I guess unintentional bullying is like breaking the law only in a limited and specific way or having special friends and family government procurement channels. All fine as long as done by the right sort of people i.e. government ministers.

https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1329511799171985409

Incidentally well done to all of the Conservative MPs who have this evening said bullying is absolutely fine as long as it is done by someone you personally like.

Continuing in the long-standing UK political tradition of being supportive of bullies in your own party.

I see there is an argument that you kind of need a bit of bullying in a difficult department.

As if bullying isn't actually going to make a dysfunctional workplace even worse. An entirely specious argument.

Read 6 tweets

David Henig

@DavidHenigUK

19 Nov

https://twitter.com/rolandmcs/status/1329311138908155906

I fear this is correct. Though with a lot of blame-shifting by participants. Think whoever decided to brand normal contents of a trade agreement a threat to UK sovereignty if included in an EU trade deal deserves particular blame. Similarly those misleading about NI Protocol.

https://twitter.com/rolandmcs/status/1329311138908155906

Would also love to know what the UK negotiators' plan was to overcome internal opposition from the ERG. If it was "we'll get a deal they will be fine with" then there was a fatal flaw at the start making negotiations largely pointless.

Also if the plan of the UK side was that the EU would suddenly yield at the last minute, then it wasn't strong to start with, and failed to take account of the chances a genuine EU-crisis emerged (always likely, there are several each year) dw.com/en/hungary-pol…

Read 6 tweets

David Henig

@DavidHenigUK

18 Nov

When thinking about Global Britain, the real not pretend one, I tend to start with our openness to inward movement of people and capital, and the threats to these.

Wanting more exports doesn't make you a supporter of free trade. If that's the emphasis, probably the opposite.

Global Britain after a referendum won by appealing to protectionism was always going to be a stretch. Interesting that in both the US and UK the previously pro free trade party is struggling to understand what it thinks about trade.

And while on the theme of free trade and the backlash to it. do keep wondering if one of the most important things we need to do is ensure services production / export is thought as important as goods.

Read 4 tweets