🚨This is shocking: Trump apparently "reached out" to the two Republican Wayne County Commissioners. The next day, they signed an affidavit saying they want to rescind their votes to certify the results.
Channeling @BrendanNyhan, what you say if you saw this in another country.
The underlying tweet from my first tweet in this thread was deleted. The screenshot is from this @AP story: apnews.com/article/joe-bi…
NEW: Reports are not just that Trump "reached out." He personally called the Wayne County Commissioner. And THEN she sought to rescind her vote to certify the results.
This is an utterly brazen attack on our democracy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Justice Alito writes for himself, Thomas, and Gorsuch. Barrett did not participate.
Alito starts off ominously: he fears "serious post-election problems" with PA Supreme Court decision. 2/
Alito makes uses some odd phrasing in his statement.
-He notes that PA Supreme Court was 4-3. So what?
-He uses “natural disaster,” in quotes as explaining the justification the PA Supreme Court gave for its ruling.
The contempt for the state supreme court just oozes out. 3/
The basic gist here is that not requiring masks at the polls disproportionately harm minority voters because they are at greater risk of COVID-19--so they are less likely to feel comfortable voting.
Texas is one of only 5 states that won't let anyone vote by mail cause of COVID concerns. So these voters face the choice of going to the polls with a higher risk or not voting. Court finds the effect of the mask mandate violates the VRA.
THREAD: Have Trump-appointed judges impacted 2020 election litigation and therefore how we run the election? Let us count the ways.
(Spoiler: they have. A lot). 1/
There have been at least 25 cases in federal courts, brought by plaintiffs seeking to ease voting rules (especially during a pandemic), that have produced appeals.
Voting rights plaintiffs are 4 for 25 overall. For you baseball fans, that means they are batting .160. 2/
In 2 of those 4 cases, state had agreed to the voting change (RI and NC). NC case is still on appeal. A 3rd was about whether to run the election at all after a candidate died (MN).
BUT in the 21 cases, district courts granted relief in 18 of them, only to see reversal. 3/
THREAD on #SCOTUS 4-4 decision refusing to intervene in Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision. It's a BIG deal.
Normally, the U.S. Supreme Court won't hear cases from state courts about state law. This decision was under PA state constitution's protection for right to vote. 1/
The PA Supreme Court had extended absentee ballot deadline due to pandemic, saying the PA Constitution's "free and equal" clause required expanded voter access.
That should have ended the matter. 2/
But PA Republicans argued that the PA Supreme Court's decision altered the "manner" of running elections under Art. I, Sec. 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which lets state "legislatures" determine the "times, places, and manner" of holding elections. 3/
THREAD: How many times have federal appellate courts unduly deferred to state legislatures or election officials in recent days, rejecting challenges and failing to uphold the constitutional right to vote? Let us count. 1/
3rd Circuit, rejecting challenge to Pennsylvania’s signature requirement for candidates to appear on the ballot. 2/
5th Cir., reversing a district court order that had rejected Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s directive to allow only one ballot drop off location per county. 3/
Reading this opinion makes is abundantly clear that this court does not believe there is a fundamental, individual right to vote enshrined within the U.S. Constitution. The court rejects all claims of a burden on individual voters.
Shorter 5th Circuit: your ballot may be thrown out for a signature mismatch, but too bad so sad, it doesn't matter that you've lost your right to vote!