1) Quote thread
"Thanks to 'Corona', many people now understand how the PCR test works & will be even better able to understand that the evidence in the following studies is based on a positive PCR test result, which is not conclusive and cannot prove the presence of a virus!"
2) "Corona-Initiative Deutscher Mittelstand (CIDM Online) [docs.google.com/presentation/d…] creates graphs and statistics based on the existing data of the institutions. They determined an average vaccination effectiveness of 10%."
3) "CIDM Online creates the graphics for the flu vaccination figures based on the RKI
Ergo 10% vaccine effectiveness for flu vaccination [docs.google.com/presentation/d…]
This statistic is a good example of the meaningless of the statement about the effectiveness of the flu vaccination.
1) 'The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes.'
2) 'And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed "genome" and even the so-called "target genes" allegedly specific to the "new coronavirus". The test is worthless and all "positive" results obtained so far ..' ..
3) 'should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world's leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!'
1. Further quote from 'Dr. Terence Kealey and the Myth of Scientific Objectivity' & transcript crossfit.com/health/terence…
'....it's a very important question,' ... 'So, let me just answer this. First of all, John Ioannidis at Stanford wrote a paper.'
2. 'It's now been cited over 5,000 times [2019]: “Why Most Scientific Papers Are Wrong.” And it's not just John Ioannidis. There's a group of them now. They're superb.' ...
... 'And these people are pointing out that over half of all scientific papers are just wrong. So, the...'
3. ...'question is therefore, how do we know? Well, the answer, I'm afraid, is to understand what a scientific paper is.'
'When, after I published my book, I was interviewed by what we in England called The Times Higher Education Supplement, what you call The Chronicle of ...'
..."and so the question therefore becomes: Why do we do this as scientists? I mean, no one in this room needs to be told that science is always getting it wrong. Everyone in this room knows that the person who invented the idea that continents shift destroyed his career by so..."
..."doing. Everyone knows that. Everyone knows that Semmelweis in Vienna destroyed his career by suggesting that obstetricians should wash their hands before rather than after delivering his babies. We all know that science is constantly correcting itself, and yet, at any one..."
"moment, it's always the same: 97% of scientists agree that the science is settled. And the government makes it worse."
There's a very good paper by a man called Daniel Sarewitz, which has got — again, it’s available online, and he points out — here we come back to the..."
Highly recommend listening to 'Myth of Scientific Objectivity' by Dr. Terence Kealey, helps to understand the reason why we are fed pseudoscience
"So, let me just tell a few stories first. When I was an intern in my medical - in my hospital, and don't forget in Britain doctors go to medical school much younger than here,so I was only 23 or 24 at the time - I worked for the professor of medicine, and we had a patient who.."
.."was extremely ill, but the professor of medicine persuaded the professor of surgery to operate on this person almost as a favor. And so I wheeled the patient across through what we call the operating theatre, patient was operated upon,very predictably died.And the professor.."
1. Transatlantic globalists and fascist elites have turned facade democracy into a final smear tragedy. Article written by Ullrich Mies, 1st published 22nd August, republished today it seems rubikon.news/artikel/transn…
Raw auto translation by deepl.com, quotes...
2. Since March 2020, the form of rule that has been systematically unfolding since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989/1990 has been fully in evidence: A transnationally operating oligarchic caste has taken over rule in the Western “democracies.
3. The mass base of "traditional" fascism was the enthusiastic petty bourgeoisie, incited by propaganda (1). The leader (state) promised the masses salvation from all evils. The leader carried the masses, the masses carried the leader (state) and the latter led them into war ..