1\ This is the weirdest thread about a lighthouse you will ever read
12 miles off the English coast are the dangerous Eddystone Rocks, which so terrified mariners that they preferred to risk shipwreck by hugging the French coast
2\ The first person to attempt a lighthouse on the Rocks was Henry Winstanley in 1969. But England was at war with France, and a French privateer took Henry prisoner and destroyed the works
Louis XIV set Henry free, saying "France is at war with England, not with humanity"
3\ Henry finished the wooden lighthouse but had the bad judgment to be making additions to it with five other men when the Great Storm of 1703 hit. He and his men were never seen again
The Great Storm killed over 1,000 seaman and toppled many more chimneys
4\ Next up was Captain John Lovett, who undertook to build a replacement lighthouse
Echoing the plot of the Three Little Pigs, Lovett abandoned the earlier all-wood design for one incorporating brick
5\ One of the light keepers was a 94 year old named Henry Hall (probably out there hiding from Coronavirus)
And here's where the story gets WEIRD
In 1755 the structure caught fire, and Hall somehow, um, ingested molten lead
Obviously we need to detour to explore Hall's story
6\ While the 94 year old was throwing buckets of water at the structure fire, he had the misfortune to look up with his mouth open at the exact moment that a torrent of molten lead fell from the roof
It went down his throat!
7\ The lighthouse burned down, but a passing boat saw Hall and his men on the rocks. They dragged 94 year old Hall through the surf with a rope
8\ Back ashore, Hall's story was discounted by doctors as the rantings of an old man. But when he died shortly thereafter, the autopsy found congealed lead in his stomach
The ingot now lives at the National Museum of Scotland
9\ But because this was Enlightenment Era England, our story doesn't end there
To prove that you could live after drinking molten lead, The Royalty Society undertook a series of experiments wherein they force fed molten lead to animals, killing them
10\ A series of other lighthouses followed on Eddystone Rocks
But so profitable was the private lighthouse industry that in 1834 Parliament nationalized it
Economics students ever since have, bizarrely, been taught that governments must build lighthouses because markets won't
11\ In 1982 the current lighthouse on Eddystone Rocks was automated, which seems a good end for our story
12\12 You can read a delightful short history of the early UK lighthouse industry here:
2\ Garett's scholarship (summarized in "10% Less Democracy") persuasively argues that outcomes of all sorts are improved when governments are a little less responsive to the political process, and a little more responsive to insulated technocrats
3\ Garett's prior is that Sweden had bad COVID-19 outcomes. He's wrong about this (for reasons that would require another thread to explain), but the assumption seems to have made him see Sweden as a nail in need of his "less democracy" hammer
1\ There's a sort of "science homily" about limes and scurvy:
That Lind did a randomized control trial with limes, completely eradicated scurvy, and then was ignored by the scientific establishment because they were all idiots
I was surprised to learn this ain't so...
2\ The proceedings from the Royal Society of London make it clear that the scientific establishment was, well, scientific. It's just that the data was confusing!
First, the proposed mechanisms of action didn't make sense:
3\ Second, there were cases where scurvy happened despite lime juice, as well as cases where scurvy was avoided despite a diet of only meat:
1\ Many of my conservative friends part ways with me when it comes to immigration
They believe in free association but see problems when it comes to free movement of people across borders
What about crime? Welfare? Voting?
There's a comic book that addresses these concerns!
2\ My notes from the book:
3\ I'd like to see @bryan_caplan address the criticism that some of his rebuttals ("Immigrants aren't that socialist!", "They don't commit much crime!") are plausibly true only *because* of immigration restrictions
Would those rebuttals hold with fully open borders?
1\ Has anyone seen data that compares guilds who ration supply through cap and trade (NYC taxis, floor brokers) to guilds that ration supply through arbitrary certification (doctors, lawyers, teachers, London taxis)?
2\ To keep supply below demand, certification must be stultifying; it must include material irrelevant to the job. Hence the legions of dimwit teachers and doctors
I would think cap and trade gets closer to efficient Coasian outcomes
But I don't know how to test the theory
3\ Though the comparison between NYC and London taxis suggests a direction for inquiry. Are credentialed taxis more expensive than taxis that just have to buy a license and pass a minimal geography test?