Thread by @LemieuxLGM

I still don't understand why every piece about Murphy feels compelled to qualify the completely unambiguous evidence that she's a hack Trump boot polisher severely damaging the country with colleagues insisting based on nothing that she isn't

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1329890106841440256

"She's not a bona fide Trump person and doesn't like people saying that, she just believes that she owes loyalty to Trump above loyalty to the country" uh OK

"But if I don't betray my public office by refusing to collaborate in Trump's election theft scheme I might lose my job 8 weeks before I lose it anyway" is not actually a real moral dilemma, unless you're the slavering lickspittle of an authoritarian president

These praising-with-faint-damns Murphy stories are a part of the problem in themselves

And yes there is no possible reason to grant anonymity to someone so they can claim against all evidence that Murphy isn't a Trump partisan. If they won't put their name on it don't print it!

https://twitter.com/derekmke/status/1329894477448818690

"Woman enabling fascism really not that into fascism" lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2020/11/woman-…

Democracy depends on public officials adhering to basic norms. By the same token, public officials who refuse to adhere to democratic norms should be treated with opprobrium