1. The European Religion: Epicureanism vs Stoicism: All classes have different degrees of agency and resulting differences in responsibility. However, all people require mindfulness within the limits of their agency and responsibility.
2. The Epicurean Program is the west's scientific and verbal analog to the Buddhist unscientific and experiential method of obtaining mindfulness, and the west's lower working and laboring class religions.
3. The stoic program is an analog of the Confucian program, of middle, upper middle and lower upper class people, have greater agency, work in business, politics, or war, and cannot insulate themselves from the struggles of doing so.
4. Aryanism( think the early Romans or the Spartans - adversarial excellence and destiny to rule lesser men and transform them and the world ) has no parallel in other civilizations.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Curt Doolittle

Curt Doolittle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @curtdoolittle

23 Nov
Education Reform
1. Add P-Law's Gramamars, Restore Logic(reason), Testimony, Rhetoric(persuade), and Debate(adversarialism),
2. Add P-Law's contract, tort, administrative, constitutional law, and P-Law's behavioralism
3. Add personal/family finance, basic micro/macro econ.
4. Add P-law's trifunctionalism: psychology, sociology, and politics. This is how those subjects should be taught.
5. Add P-Law's evolutionary history of man and population groups (adaptation), the evolution of civilizations, the evolution of art, the evolution of technology.
6. Science as it is taught: biology, chemistry, physics, is no longer of value. Computers are an occupational skill. Art and Literature are entertainment, not education. Civics is indoctrination into marxism-globalism-multiculturalism.
Read 5 tweets
21 Nov
Ukrainian Revolution
1.Mass Assembly in near the govt. bldgs.
2.Barricading the roads with tires, filling them with rubble - bulletproof.
3.Small number of nationalists fight, take buildings. "visit" police, politicians, at home.
4.Draw fire. Delegitimizes govt/mil/pol.
5. Win.
The American equivalent of this strategy requires a slight variation because of the larger scale, but is equally easy, because the minute you have civil war it's an post-verbal, existential demonstration of a failed govt, and firing on people with moral claims is delegitimizing.
This delegitimization has an immediate effect on military and police, the bureaucracy, formerly neutral population segments, radicalizes sympathizers, and most importantly, the international community - in which the govt immediately loses all soft power and can't function.
Read 7 tweets
21 Nov
"Gaslighting" means questioning your sanity because of a failure of your sense perception. I does not mean falsifying your ideas or beliefs you depend upon to explain your model of the world, on terms you can understand, with your ability, background, and knowledge.
Our long march out of ignorance, superstition, bias, and wishful thinking is a record of the falsification of our ideas and beliefs - the vast majority of which have been false attribution of design or intent to phenomena emergent from nothing other than the laws of the universe.
Science like our law it evolved from requires statements are testifiable, because they provide explanatory power under realism, naturalism, and operationalism - not that they're 'provable' or 'verifiable' - not because we can make "justifiable" but untestifiable excuses for them.
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov
1.Western civilization is based not on harmony but on ADVERSARIALISM. Adversarialism allows boys and men to constantly adapt and innovate and discover their value in a hierarchy on a team. Women removed adversarialism for girls, and the state for 'minorities'. That's the problem.
2."Everyone gets a prize" is a symptom of the gradual eradication of the western group evolutionary strategy of maximizing training in adaptation and innovation, thereby directing male aggression to the production of commons by externality. Markets and law follow this same logic.
3. So in pursuit of harmony (not finding the place that you can add value to the hierarchy of the team) we create people who are incompetent, overconfident, destined to fail in the market, and destined to hate the civilization's false promise to them.
Read 7 tweets
2 Nov
The subject deserves a long treatment, but the underlying issue is the limits of set logic vs operational logic. Praxiology is NOT axiomatic(deductive and justificationary) but operational(Constructive and falsificationary) - Mises and Rothbard were punching above their weight.
It's more correct to say that (a) Babbage failed to inspire an operationalist(computational) movement. It took war and Turing. (b) the set-theoretic model of mathematics was a failure, and caused the set-theoretic model of language (philosophy) that was also a failure.
In other words, the logical model of set theory itself is a failure. Information for deduction will emerge in any given system, meaning that the only method of falsifying it (proof) is by construction (reconstruction). Closure is only provided by demonstration in reality.
Read 8 tweets
1 Nov
United center-left vs center-right front might work. But our (c-right) primary solution (requiring testimony in public speech) puts us in opposition with the narrative and strategy of the Jewish c-left. Peterson was a bridge (token). Only Karl Smith (c-left econ) is honest.
2) And I don't mean intentionally honest, because, (as in law) tort (dishonesty) does not require intent - it requires a failure of due diligence.
3) Eric is a mathematical economist but w/o full accounting. But he's one of the only people who can meaningfully discuss 'mathiness' problem he's encountered in physics and economics but hasn't himself escaped. For fellow supernerds this is probably the fundamental problem.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!