Getting really tired of this.
I'll give you a chance to show me where I said there was no election fraud or that we shouldn't look into it.
After you can't, I will be blocking you for lying.
I'll give you a chance to show me where I said there was no election fraud or that we shouldn't look into it.
After you can't, I will be blocking you for lying.
https://twitter.com/JerseyEd25/status/1330576260783804417
It's the same strawman over and over again. Trump lost by tens of thousands of votes in multiple states. Asserting that there is no evidence, after looking at claims, of widespread fraud that would have changed the results is not the same as saying no fraud or don't look into it.
As an example. In Michigan, there is a legitimate dispute over ~400 ballots in Wayne County. If it was a close race, we would need to fight it out over them. Trump lost the state by over 150,000 votes.
Pointing to 400 ballots to suggest a different result is annoying.
Pointing to 400 ballots to suggest a different result is annoying.
Same thing in Pennsylvania. We can have a legitimate fight over the ~8K mail ballots related to the deadline, but Trump lost by over 75K.
You need evidence not just of something wrong/bad, but also that it made a difference.
You need evidence not just of something wrong/bad, but also that it made a difference.
Since there is no such evidence, the Trump legal team when asked has resorted to a baseless conspiracy about a secret algorithm from Venezuela being run by the CIA and with thousands of accomplices, including Republican Governors, changing tens of thousands of votes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
