Can't sleep, damn insomnia. Thoughts running so I'll share. Tomorrow marks 17 days since the DPC told me that my complaint about the PSC travel pass being used as a tool of mass surveillance, was valid.

It's 2 weeks since I emailed the DPC and said I didn't want it included in
with the current DPC case re the PSC as it had nothing to do with it. A travel pass is one of those functions which the Social Welfare is allowed use the PSC.

The 2 weeks is important because that's the time limit to act once the complaint is deemed valid, there's a precedent
somewhere.

Anywho, I'm mulling over the individual number of data protection/GDPR breaches involved. So, you have a travel pass and you get on public transport. The PSC travel pass is supplied by dept SW. It has your name, a biometric photo and on the magnetic strip is a
unique identifier. The unique identifier is a number, not the same number on the public services card travel pass. The dept. SW issues this unique identifying number. You get on the bus, luas, dart and you scan to get on and in many cases 'off' too, depends on the mode of public
transport you take. The public transport provider collects data every time you scan the travel pass. The date, time & journey are recorded and also the unique identifying number. So far so good. Most of the transport providers think this is anonymised data. They majority send the
data back to the NTA, the do so because payment is dependent on the data. Some, like Irish Rail, may send the data directly back to the department, that's not 100% clear, but all the data eventually ends up back with the department because the Dept has an agreement with the NTA
to access their data, INCLUDING the unique identifier originally issued by the dept for each individual PSC travel pass user. Ya getting the picture now?

So the dept of SW has access to all of this data and under EU data precedents, you can't just hang onto a huge volume of
data like this on the off chance that you might need it to catch a public transport fare evader. And the dept SW does access it, they admitted to it last year in the PAC, that's why my complaint is valid. Ok, back to the question in point, how many individual breaches of data
protection/gdpr?

Every public transport provider thinks they're collecting anonymised data, but because it ends up back in Dept SW where they can and do match the unique identifier with individual psc travel pass user, THEY'RE NOT!

They are legally obliged to know where your
data ends up and for what purpose it's gong to be used and for how long. Ignorance is not an excuse. In 2018, there were 4.1 million psc travel pass journeys. The data collected by public transport providers was sent back to the NTA or the dept directly so that's another 4.1
million breaches. The majority of the data sent back to SW was sent back by the NTA, so we round that down to 3 million on yet another set of breaches. That's 11 million breaches in 2018 and another 4 million on top of that from the sw dept for processing the data. 15 million, in
2018 alone. I don't know how long it took to roll out the psc travel pass to all or at what rate it was used in other years, so I'll half the yearly rate to 7 million over, we say, 5 years, that's conservative enough.

Crazy shit, innit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with martinmcmahon

martinmcmahon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @williamhboney1

23 Nov
I just finished writing a piece about Revenue in the PAC about bogus self-employment last week and it got me thinking. I've been talking to whistleblowers recently, top notch people, all of them have been through 'processes'

I see patterns. 'Newbies' and I don't mean that in
a bad way, Newbies at this level have done a lot very quickly, they tend to 'spill' when the meet somebody who is genuinely interested. They try and get as much out as possible as quickly as possible. I know, I was there myself.

Then there are the 'Seasoned', at it a long
time. Focused, detailed, they listen and wait until they see a part of their extensive story, and it is extensive when you've been at it long enough, which fits into what the listener is really interested in. These whistleblowers have seen so many false dawns that they keep
Read 5 tweets
21 Nov
The top tier of #Tortoiseshack membership is €8.43 a month. Top tier comes with patron only pods, updates, early access, questions for guests and a lot more. The bottom tier of #TortoiseShack membership is €2.11 and for that you got 40 pods last month > patreon.com/join/tortoises…
Forty Podcasts since this day last month. The #Tortoiseshack is incredibly good value for money -

Oct 23 - tortoiseshack.ie/ep-382-covid-1…
Oct 23 - tortoiseshack.ie/ep-28-the-real…
Oct 24 - tortoiseshack.ie/ep-383-a-stand…
Oct 25 - tortoiseshack.ie/oppression-and…
Oct 26 - tortoiseshack.ie/sunday-special…
Read 7 tweets
14 Aug
For those concerned about bogus self employment, I'm going to do a little thread on the tweet below.

The former Minister accepts and concedes that there is no legislation which allows the dept. to make insurability of employment decisions on groups and classes of workers. >
Ireland has no legislation which allows class actions such as the labeling of workers as self employed by group or by class.

Amazingly, the Minister also accepts and concedes that despite no legislation to allow such class actions, the Department does label groups and >
classes of workers as self-employed. This is wholly unlawful.

The Minister claims that this unlawful labeling is done with the consent of the employer and the workers. Again this is entirely untrue.

The department is not labeling workers for a single employer as self-employed >
Read 6 tweets
20 Jan
I had just turned 19 and finished a 1 year secretarial course. A job was more important than anything else, any job. I sent out 300 CVs and got no replies. I took the boat to Wales and the train to London where a friend of a friend I'd never met took me to her home in Kent.

The
next day I went to an employment agency and had a job in 3 hours as a medical conference organiser.

Charles Haughey was Taoiseach.

Less than 6 months later, my sister, a year older, quit UCD and followed me over. She never came back, I did.

Charles Haughey was Taoiseach.

A
few years later, my baby brother flew to the States. He never came back.

Charlie Haughey was still Taoiseach, his arch nemesis Albert Reynolds enabled him.

The middle brother, well he hung in there long after. Right up until Bertie Ahern & Co. ran the economy off the cliff.
Read 6 tweets
30 Dec 19
It's more than 2 years since myself and Tony first started the @EchoChambersPod. We hadn't a clue what we were getting ourselves into, we just knew that there were great people out there who never got a look-in on traditional media.

Our first pod was just me and Tony shouting at
an ipod. Thanks to crowdfunding we upped our game, got decent mics and other bits and pieces we needed to improve our quality.

As we improved, we grew into the #tortoiseshack, with other great podcasts from Ruth, Rachel and Rory.

Podcasting has helped me so much, due to my
damnable health I'd become a recluse of sorts, but getting out a few times a week and meeting all kinds of interesting people rebuilt my confidence. These days I'm still wary of crowds but nowhere near as bad as I was.

Tony and Rory slag me quite a bit about my tunnel vision on
Read 6 tweets
6 Apr 19
For 20 years I've been fighting to expose the scale and cost of #BogusSelfEmployment. For 20 years I've been battling the absolute corruption of civil servants and Ministers which robs citizens of over one billion euro every goddamned year.

2 years ago, I sat with the current
Minister for Social Welfare and explained to her in detail, not just the unlawful actions of the Social Welfare Appeals Office in creating and perpetuating this fraud, but also the prima facie criminality of individual social welfare employees in covering it up. The Minister has
done sweet fuck all since then except allow it all to continue. Indeed, she has gone out of her way to deny that there is large scale bogus self employment. I have witnessed the unlawfulness and the criminality first hand. I have dragged a Social Welfare Inspector into the
Read 54 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!