In his newsletter, @LibertyRPF lamented today about the current state of big tech.
Not that his criticisms are not valid, I wanted to share how I think about big tech’s foibles.
2/ When I think about big tech, I primarily imagine them as these large, powerful countries.
What are some of the powerful countries today? USA, China, India etc. come first in mind.
3/ These countries are extremely powerful not only because they have WMD, but also the weight of history and demography play strong roles.
All these powerful countries have perhaps one thing in common. They are riddled with all sorts of failures.
4/ From botched foreign policies and deep political divisiveness to lack of freedom of expression, the list of failures in these countries is a lengthy one although the list slightly differs from country to country.
5/ Despite these real failures, some (many?) of these countries will still remain powerful for a long period of time.
It’s the proportionality that matters. If the positives significantly drown the negatives, most failures just may not matter for a long period of time.
6/ Big tech is perhaps like that. I cannot overstate the complexities any business will face when they generate the kind of revenue the big tech is generating.
7/ Amazon’s sales last year were close to Bangladesh’s GDP.
A company with ~1 mn employees generated the same level of “GDP” as did a country with ~180 mn people.
8/ Big tech faces real problems/challenges and has to deal with competing priorities that lead to non-obvious solutions.
While perhaps not all of them will remain successful, the FCF they generate each year is an incredible cushion to figure out the next S-curve.
9/ And at least some of them are probably much better at their job than any of the Presidents of those powerful countries.
If Microsoft can transform from being Micro$oft to what it is now, some of the current big techs can probably as well.
10/ Of course, that’s not guaranteed, and that’s certainly a risk.
Yes, being a shareholder of these companies certainly can warp my perception, as eloquently written by @LibertyRPF.
End/ Link to the original piece by @LibertyRPF who consistently poses these thought provoking questions.
Nick Kokonas: A Philosophy major -> derivatives trader -> owner of some of the best restaurants in the world such as Alinea, Next, The Aviary, and co-founder and CEO of Tock, a comprehensive booking system for restaurants.
2/ "Own something, make lots of decisions that have outcomes, try to be right 51% of the time, do that often and repeat."
This is essentially the casino model. Nick delves into each part of that quote to explain what he means by it.
3/ Why are restaurants perceived as bad businesses?
"...there are a lot of people in the restaurant business that are not in business so to speak."
So Nick made sure that's NOT the case with him, "this will be run as business first. It's not an art project, it's a business."
2/6 Image I: Search result on Etsy today is "dramatically better" than it was 2 years ago.
Image II: How communication between buyers and sellers continues to differentiate the Etsy experience from Amazon, Walmart etc.
3/6 "...we don't give the teams a specific dollar budget. We give them an ROI threshold to hit, and we want them to keep spending until they meet-until they no longer meet that threshold."
Paid GMS now 20-21% of all GMS, up from 15-16% last year.
This one was primarily focused on brands. And the word "Apple" was mentioned 14 times.
Here are my notes.
2/ "...a brand really means to me that if you turn off your marketing engine and you're not splattering the consumer with reminders of buy my product, buy my product, buy my product. Do they remember you? Does it last, Does it last in different cycles?"
I had this Polen Capital think piece open in a tab for months. I finally read it tonight.
Polen shares some interesting data points to argue how much the current cycle differs from the tech bubble.
2/7 From 2008-2019, Russell 1000 Growth Index (R1G) beat Russell 1000 Value Index (R1V) by >300%.
There was another era when such wide margin between them existed. It was 1988-1999.
We all know how that ended. So our pattern matching brain is tempted to infer the parallel.
3/7 Unlike the tech bubble which was propped by multiple expansion, Polen argues much of the outperformance in the current cycle is driven by fundamentals.
These two images comparing the two cycles make that case.
I do not come from money. The only reason I could even dream of coming from Bangladesh to the US for my MBA was I could get 100% of my tuition financed by student loan without any co-signor (I don't have any relative in the US).
2/7 Wholesale cancel of student loans creates the same kind of unintended consequence as canceling standardized tests does.
Most kids from my background go to schools that people in the US have never heard about even though acceptance rate in some of the schools back home is <5%
3/7 When standardized tests are canceled, it's hard to stand out with our no-name schools and lack of well curated extra-curricular filled resume.
I know they aren't talking about canceling student loans of international students, and they shouldn't.