Delhi Court takes up cases concerning 2020 #DelhiRiots. Judicial custody extended over Umar Khalid, Sharjeel ends today.

Court also takes up an application made by Sharjeel Imam seeking return of written material allegedly taken by prison officials.

@UmarKhalidJNU
@_imaams
Court: There was an application moved by Sharjeel, what has happened to his belongings?
Jail Superintendent: As per the statement of officers, he has not handed over anything. Only Rs 1000 was recovered which has been deposited with the Govt treasury
Sharjeel Imam: I handed over at least 50 pages of written material…
Jail official: As per duty register, it only mentions record of Rs 1,000 was made from him and it was deposited in the treasury.

Sharjeel Imam: That is simply incorrect.

Jail official: Can you name out an official?

Imam: Sir it was the duty officer ...
Court records in order: Reply has been given that there have been no belongings belonging to accused (Imam) deposited with Jail no.2. Jail official has reiterated the same. The applicant submits that he was told by jail official that his belongings have been recovered.
Court: Concerned jail official is requested to coordinate with the concerned Asst Jail Superintendent so that the matter can be disposed of

Jail official: If he could name the official..

Court: He is saying the Asst Superintendent and the Roshan officer.

Matter posted to Dec 7
Court now takes up the main matter.

Umar Khalid: I just want to reiterate that hardcopies of both chargesheets (should be provided). Its hard to find contents of chargesheets from newspapers everyday.

#DelhiRiots
Court says it cannot order hard copies of the chargesheets to be provided now as its earlier order directing hardcopies has been stayed by Delhi High Court.

Court: It can't happen right now. Question of hardcopy is pending with the Delhi HC. It is beyond my power now
Court asks if softcopy should be provided to Khalid or his counsel

Khalid: How would I access a soft copy in jail?

Court again says it cannot order for hard copies now since the matter is pending in HC

Adv TrideepPais: I am counsel for Umar Khalid, kindly provide him soft copy
Court asks if Sharjeel Imam would also want a soft copy of the charge sheet.

Imam: What would I do with a soft copy in jail? We can't access soft copy. It may be handed to my counsel.
Adv Surabhi Dhar requests Court that both chargesheet and supplementary charge sheet should be provided.

Court: Don't worry, all of you will get an order from the court in the next hour.
Safoora Zargar, who was granted bail earlier, Ishrat Jahan, Meeran Haider, Tahir Hussain, Gulfisha, Shafi-Ur-Rahman, Tasleem, Natasha Narwal, Saleem, Athar Khan also among those present during the virtual hearing today.

#DelhiRiots
Meeran Haider: Is this option of getting soft copy available to us as well?

Court: It was given to the counsel, at this stage please consult your lawyer.

Court says on Dec 22 it will be providing it to the Jail superintendent to provide it to Umar and to Sharjeel's counsel.
Court says it is posting the matter on December 22 for scrutiny.
Court to SPP Amit Prasad: Since all the accused are linked, we will provide it to everybody

SPP agrees.
Court: Is softcopy prohibited to be inside jail?

Jail official: Pendrives are not allowed in jail for security reasons.
Sowjhanya Shankaran, appearing for Asif Iqbal says that pen drives have been allowed in Jail no. 6 where women are lodged, but not in the jails where the men are lodged.
Shankaran: In the jails where the men are, neither are emails been responded to nor are they allowed to be given a pen drive, nor are they given access to a computer which is there in the library.

#DelhiRiots
Shankaran: Nor are we allowed to print pages of the chargesheet and send to them.

So effectively, there is no manner in which they can effectively read the chargesheet, except through screenshare when we talk to them once or twice a week.

#DelhiRiots
Shankaran: They may clarify why it is allowed in some jails and not in others

Jail official: I am not aware of Jail no. 6. I have not seen pen drives allowed in Jail 2 because of security reasons. There is every chance of getting it misused.

#DelhiRiots
Matter posted to December 22. Court says it will pass an order shortly, in half an hour. Hearing has ended.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

26 Nov
Virtual discussion on Women, Law and the Legal Profession to be held shortly as part of Jindal’s Global Virtual Conference.

Chief Justice of Jammu and Kashmir High Court, Gita Mittal to render keynote address.

@JindalGLS
@JindalGlobalUNI Image
Welcome address by Prof (Dr) C Raj Kumar, Vice-Chancellor, JGU

Presidential Address by Geeta Ramaseshan, Advocate, Madras High Court

Special Address by Pallavi Shroff, Managing Partner, Shadul Amarchand Mangaldas.

The event can be viewed live here:

Session begins. Prof (Dr) C Raj Kumar welcomes the gathering. Image
Read 56 tweets
26 Nov
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) will be celebrating Constitution Day through video conference.

Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde is the Chief Guest for the function while Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad is Guest of Honour.

#ConstitutionDay2020 #SupremeCourt

@rsprasad Image
#ConstitutionDay2020: SCBA celebration commences. Acting Secretary Rohit Pandey welcoming the guests.

"We are proud as members of Bar to be stakeholders in judicial system which protects rights of people. Supreme Court has played a stellar role on the sentinels of democracy."
#ConstitutionDay2020: Function starts with National Anthem.

#SupremeCourt #SCBA
Read 48 tweets
26 Nov
#BombayHighCourt #CourtroomExchange

During a hearing before Bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik they indicated that they will begin physical hearing of matters from December 1, 2020.

Justice Shinde: We will hear for 4 hours everyday. We also have fundamental rights! Image
Justice Shinde added that they have been facing various issues with virtual hearings.

Shinde: From morning to evening we only hear sound. Advocates do not have proper system we cannot hear them properly. We understand there are atrocities committed everyday.

#videoconferencing
Shinde: Yesterday we asked certain Sr. Adv. to mute their mikes for sometime as there was sound at their end.

When the lawyers present in VC supported physical hearing, the court clarified that these were only “premature comments”.
Read 4 tweets
26 Nov
Karnataka HC hears a batch of pleas challenging induction of 3 members of State Legislative Council into Cabinet of Ministers.

#MLCelection
#MLC Image
Advocate General Prabhuling Navadgi is making submissions on behalf of the State (in person)

#MLC
#Cabinet
Navadgi: Allegations are quite scandalous.
Read 13 tweets
26 Nov
A CJI SA Bobde led bench to shortly deliver judgment on the Skoda Volkswagen India’s appeal seeking quashing of an FIR registered in Uttar Pradesh over alleged emission cheat devices installed in its cars. 
@SkodaIndia
@volkswagenindia
#SupremeCourt Image
The Allahabad High Court had in October dismissed the Volkswagen India’s plea for quashing of an FIR dated July 10 registered against it in Noida for installing “cheat devices” in its vehicles.
#SupremeCourt
Senior Adv A M Singhvi, appearing for @volkswagenindia had stated that directions of NGT slapping a fine on the manufacturer over the cheat devices had been stayed by the Supreme Court earlier in 2019 and the new FIR is also based on similar allegations.
@DrAMSinghvi
Read 5 tweets
26 Nov
#SupremeCourt bench led by Justice AM Khanwilkar to shortly take up plea demanding a judicial inquiry into an incident from Aurangabad, Bihar in which a District Judge, Dr. Dinesh Kumar Pradhan was allegedly threatened, abused and chased by a police sub-inspector. Image
The petition has drawn a parallel between the 1989 Nadiad incident of Gujarat with that of the current one. The Nadiad case dates to 1989 when the Chief Judicial Magistrate was beaten, handcuffed, paraded and molested by police
@BiharPoliceCGRC
The plea states that the sub-inspector was accompanied by paramilitary personnel on a flag march when he attacked Dr Pradhan when he was out on an evening walk.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!