Next week the Home Office has chartered a flight to Jamaica, intending to deport people who have been in the UK their whole lives.
Today the #Stansted15 appeal their conviction for peacefully stopping one of these flights from occurring.
Deportations are the pinnacle of the Government's Hostile Environment agenda. The threat of deportation, detention and re-detention and immigration raids, are all tactics used by the Home Office to keep people in a state of chaos and to stop them being part of our communities.
The Home Office will argue that the people being removed are "criminals" or "FNOs". The majority will have minor criminal records - in many cases, unjust convictions. They are essentially punished twice for the same crime by being deported AFTER serving their sentences.
The detention and deportation regime is an extension of the prison system. It is run in collaboration with the Ministry of Defence. It has no oversight. There is little access to legal advice. Those in detention have less rights than those in prison. #BlackLivesMatter
The flight next week has people on it who have been here for 20+ years. They are British in everything but paper. The Home Office has a history putting people on these flights who should not be there. They oversubscribe them, away from public scrutiny and behind closed doors.
The Home Office will argue that "do-gooder" lawyers will get people off the flight. The Home Office only gives people 72 hours notice that they are on the flight. If the flights are last minute, the legal challenges are too. 72 hours to get help and/or say goodbye.
The Government committed to learning the lessons of the Windrush scandal. Not one Windrush recommendation has yet been implemented. A recommendation to stop the deportation of people who have lived here since they were children was removed. theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/f…
On top of this, the Government is deporting people mid-pandemic. The NHS is at risk, the economy is struggling, and people are dying. The focus on deportations is a mockery. This isn't about your safety or protecting the public. This is about pursuing an a political agenda.
What the #Stansted15 did was stand up for members of our communities who have family, friends and lives in the UK.
They stopped people from being removed to a country where they don't know anyone, don't have a job, may not speak the language, and have no access to support.
The Home Office cannot throw the book at people like #Stansted15 for stopping one of the most cruel and abhorrent aspects of our immigration system. Especially not under terrorism law.
Charter flights should be ended, detention should be ended.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: Right now it is being reported that people may have died in the Channel, including a baby and a toddler.
The Home Office will spin this so that they are removed from responsibility. You'll hear noises about traffickers and lawyers. But whose fault is it really?
I am VERY sure every single person in this country wants these crossings to end. I do not want a single person to have to make that terrifying journey or die trying. The solutions we pose will bring an end to this trend. jcwi.org.uk/briefing-safe-…
This year, we have taken in fewer asylum seekers than normal because all existing routes to the UK have been closed. NO resettlement has taken place. Routes for children closed. Family reunion at a minimum. It is no surprise that people are increasingly desperate.
I really didn't want to do a thread on safe and legal routes to the UK - but I can already tell that there's going to be a minefield of myths and hate speech today and there's some things that we need to be saying.
It makes total sense that there is an increase in crossings. Good weather, bad pandemic. Govt. has said that they will "shut down" routes and militarise the border. People on the other side of the channel can hear that too - it will make them more desperate. Predictable outcome.
No they are not "economic" migrants. We have a system for work and study. It is not a good system for people's rights, and the govt. want to make it worse, but it exists. People use it. That is why there are international students and migrants working in every industry/area.
The Prime Minister said something today to the @CommonsLiaison that was both incredibly important and utterly shocking. He admitted that he does not know migrants and their families are unable to access public funds. His emotional response was, rightly, disgust.
Most people are unaware that many migrants are unable to access Government support right now during a pandemic due to harsh visa conditions. At a time when it's clear to us all that support from the Government is the difference between life and death.
As a result, many have been forced to continue working in unsafe conditions or have been made destitute and homeless. They cannot self-isolate without a safety net to catch them. @childrensociety believe it affects up to 100,000 children.
I am so fed up with having to debunk the racism in the @greenparty. Deeply disappointed and angry at @jon_bartley perpetuating racism via the lens of the environment. Here is why.
Why isn’t the same rule applied to kosher meat? Not that it should at all. But the fact that this doesn’t is far more about Islamophobia than about stunning. Particularly as kosher rules are in some ways far stricter.
Most halal meat in the UK IS stunned. If you’re killing an animal, you’re killing an animal. So unless you’re arguing for all meat to be cancelled - why specify halal?
Hey @GreenRupertRead. As a migration expert and a green, I can tell you that everything you think on migration is not only factually incorrect but is also racist. You don’t represent the Greens or the climate movement. Step back from #bbctqt and let someone qualified step in ⬇️
your ‘take’ is completely western centric, designed only to protect white people in the global north. It’s also founded on historic racist narratives of population control - which call only for black and brown people to control their populations.
Your view lacks any systemic or structural analysis of what caused and causes the climate analysis. It’s not individials, it requires system change. Your vision is based on maintaining the status quo rather than levelling up rights for everyone.