I've always found it interesting and poetically apropos that "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" is the expression used to further the "self-made man/personal responsibility" concept of success, and to justify the level of adversity many have to deal with in order to succeed.
It's apropos because, physically speaking, it is fucking impossible to pull yourself up by your bootstraps. In fact, the phrase originated as a way to describe a "ludicrously far-fetched or impossible task."

en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pull_ones…
The concept creep that has led to the phrase's current usage, meant to mean, "to improve one's position by one's own efforts," is perfectly reflective of people's misunderstanding of the concept of "making oneself." They're equally nonsensical, and many of us just ignore that.
Successful people love to point out that their lot in life is the result of their hard work and tenacity—and it is. But they never seem to examine that idea further.

They never ask themselves, "Where did I *get* this capacity for hard work? Where did I *get* my tenacity?"

They often downplay the role of luck because they feel it minimizes or marginalizes their hard work. They did work hard, after all, so don't they deserve what they have?
The answer is that "deserve" makes no sense in this context, because it implies a level of agency that doesn't exist. *None* of us have it. To say one "deserves" their success or failure is the equivalent to saying they "deserve" their predisposition for colon cancer.
No one picks their genes, their parents, their environment, their upbringing, their psychology, their temperament, their talents, their capacity to learn, or their capacity to excel any more than they choose their height or eye color or level of melanin. That is all pure luck.
Some might say, "Yes, but once they're adults they make their own decisions." Sure, but the decisions they make—and the decisions it occurs to them to make (or not make)—are the result of those prior influences. You simply cannot do that which never occurs to you to do.
Unfortunately, despite our inability to choose any of these things, they are all hugely consequential to how our lives turn out. Our society values certain attributes more than others, it praises certain talents more than others, it rewards certain capacities more than others.
Furthermore, certain life circumstances are more conducive to success than others. Where, when, and to whom you're born directly impact your opportunities and choices. Successful people often ignore this, acting like they've materialized as themselves one day, fully-formed.
Add to this the effects of externalities, where certain communities have historically been at a disadvantage, where critical resources aren't divvied up fairly, and you're likely to see exacerbations of these trends. Success becomes less likely, and exponentially more difficult.
Of course, you'll still see successes. You'll still have extraordinary people who prosper after fighting their way through seemingly insurmountable adversity, and to many this proves that hard work is all it takes. The bootstraps, once again, defying the laws of physics.
But this is an illusion. The tenacity required to succeed, especially when starting from a disadvantage, is just as much a matter of luck, from one's own perspective, as their height or predisposition for colon cancer.

You. Didn't. Pick. Any. Of. This. And. Yet. You. Benefit.
This doesn't mean you have no right to what you've earned. It doesn't mean that behaviors and habits that foster success aren't valuable. Those are good things we should encourage.

What it means is we should have humility about ourselves and compassion (not sympathy) for others.
The fact is that, no matter how much harder you've worked than the next guy, if you were them you'd be in their exact spot.

There, but for the grace of luck, go you. Never forget that.
So when we meditate on our success, we should be mindful of the *colossal* role that good fortune plays in it, and perhaps try not to be smug douchebags about it to others. Instead, we should take our fortunate position and try to help others succeed.

There are no bootstraps. We're all rolls of the dice, and we live and die by that happenstance. We should help each other, not just for this reason, but also because we all benefit from creating a world where more people flourish more often.

Be humble. Be compassionate. Be kind.
@threadreaderapp Please unroll.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angel Eduardo

Angel Eduardo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StrangelEdweird

12 Nov
@tenin0 @roderickgraham @ConceptualDoc @IanAdAstra You seem to be misunderstanding Rod's position, and I don't think it's totally your fault. These terms often create confusion. I think that when Rod says that inequality is not justified, he only means "in a moral sense." That doesn't mean he's intending to limit other freedoms.
@tenin0 @roderickgraham @ConceptualDoc @IanAdAstra I don't see how attempting to correct certain inequalities automatically means limiting the freedom of others, which seems to be your assumption. It is the mere recognition of a problem as a problem, and based on that recognition a conversation can be had about solutions.
@tenin0 @roderickgraham @ConceptualDoc @IanAdAstra Personally, I have a "forget the ceiling; raise the floor" approach. I don't care how rich or prosperous you get, so long as no one is left to languish in an unbreakable cycle of poverty, debt, and suffering that limits social mobility. We want to grant more freedom to all.
Read 15 tweets
12 Nov
Removed that tweet about suicide rates going up 200%, as it appears to be unsubstantiated.

Regardless, if you're feeling distraught or depressed, there are resources for you. Call 1-800-273-8255 (USA hotline)

factcheckni.org/articles/has-t…
Thanks to @PeavyPosy for the heads up on this. @roderickgraham, check it.

Other resources:

idealist.org/en/careers/sel…
And here are some tips for practicing mindfulness to help stave away overwhelming and negative thoughts.

idealist.org/en/days/how-mi…
Read 5 tweets
14 Oct
The conversation I'm seeing regarding "sexual orientation" versus "sexual preference" is like the moral argument in religious circles focusing on whether homosexuality is chosen or innate.

In each case, both sides completely miss the more important, fundamental point. 1/
If memory serves, "sexual preference" and "sexual orientation" were interchangeable (up until yesterday, apparently) with little cause for uproar, despite everyone being at least casually aware that they refer to different things: Orientation ≈ innate; Preference ≈ choice. 2/
The argument about homosexuality being innate versus a choice is motivated by the idea that if it's innate, then it is God-given, and we therefore can't justify persecuting homosexuals on religious grounds. 3/
Read 10 tweets
21 Sep
@DrIbram @darth_leveon @MD_Ed_Memes Hi, I’m not racist.

I’ll give you a moment to collect the bits of your mind that just exploded every which way.

This idea is ludicrous. Are babies either racist or antiracist? At what point does that happen? Immediately postpartum or sometime on the way home from the hospital?
@DrIbram @darth_leveon @MD_Ed_Memes And if it isn’t instant—if you see it in your heart to grant babies a few moments of peace before this nonsense ideology kicks in—then what are babies BEFORE they become either racist or antiracist?
@DrIbram @darth_leveon @MD_Ed_Memes What even is this, man? I can’t see how you honestly think this worldview actually does anyone any good, given how obviously nonsensical, tautological, and divisive it reveals itself to be under the tiniest bit of logical scrutiny.

Or is logic also racist?
Read 7 tweets
18 Sep
From @kmele on @wethefifth:

"The perspective that is allowable in certain corners of the intelligentsia and broadcast television is one that says that blackness is some kind of congenital defect—some sort of seal of your societal proclivity toward failure and awfulness." (1/10)
"And it’s not your fault, but you are likely to fail absent the intervention of white people to save you, help you, redeem you, to speak out on your behalf.

It’s a perspective that says that the most important thing about you—and about anyone else, perhaps—is your race." (2/10)
"At a minimum, it is among the most important things. It is a perspective that says that the only explanation for any disparity between racial groups is racial bias." (3/10)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!