Herd Immunity is so BADLY understood, and subject of innumerable lies, misinformation and myths.

There's CONSTANT hammering on simple ideas from fear propaganda. Main lie is we haven't reach HI, we're far away from it, as we need a 60-70%

Let's bring some scientifical light.
HI is considered a binary issue, you have it or not. That's BLATANTLY a lie.

With EVERY SINGLE infection, HI grows&provides some degree of common protection, as any infected will die or, over 99%, survive.

Both ways he gets out of any transmission chain.
It will slow any epidemic transmission & make the Rt descend

Proportional to HI growth, spread ALSO slows

Even in the SO WRONG 70% theory, 5% diffusion will slow spread, bigger ones like 15 or 20 will SERIOUSLY affect it

The NON exponential growth, but Gompertz, reflects this
If you're A TRUE scientific like @SunetraGupta or @mgmgomes1 you'll find that this growth affects SO dramatically transmission chains, that a certain point, those more likely to infect many become immune, or die, and provoke a bottleneck making the epidemic to stop.

HI threshold
U only have to consider that were all not equal, that ones are more prone to get infected (+contacts,-defences), some are more likely to transmit (+contacts); and u MATHEMATICALLY will find that a HIT 10%~25% will (IS!) happen.

No way u reach 70 without burning the bottleneck
Climate conditions put different limits for HIT needed, thus making seasonality+HIT the true regents for the epidemic

HITs lower than 5% are enough to stop epidemic in moderate climate summers. We've already seen it

When weather becomes better for virus again, it may come back
The fear official narrative is attacking and trying to silence this science, even thru personal attacking as censorship, as the sad story of those 2 brave women shows. Just check their TLs

It's our duty to struggle this good science to enter on the debate RIGHT NOW

Here it goes
Herd Immunity Threshold can be reached with low (>20%) infection rates.
You don't have to fully reach any limit to grow protection from HI, and any close you get to HIT protects society and slows spread very fast.

70% needed and any HI being useless till u reach it IS LIE.
HI isn't a good or evil policy, IT'S A FACT. It's happening ALL the time

Vaccination works THIS way, as there's people u can't vax, and avoiding contacts to infect, u protect them

As 70% is calculated thru 1-1/R0, they're lying given a number: R0 stills a highly debatable issue

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with plaforscience

plaforscience Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @plaforscience

22 Nov
Italy's life expectancy is 83 years, covid deaths average there is 82.
98% of them have 1 or more comorbilities

So, this epidemic is killing ONLY those very weak about to die

The myth of CV killing anyone is more than over. We MUST settle this truth before consider ANY policy ImageImage
The restrictions we're applying are WEAKENING those vulnerable Isolation is proven a weaker for the oldies, it causes suffer, stress and life expectancy loss in the older, as all the good pre covid science knows

Living stressing situations alone, is worsening old people's health
Restrictions are ALSO worsening the rest of population health thru brutal health care access, intolerable levels of fear and stress and general poverty.

Education loss, preventive medicine and misery have a huge cost on lifes expectancy for them all.
Read 5 tweets
18 Nov
Denmark masks study is finally out!

The result again, is a blown in the restrictions' face.

Only 0,3% less infections in the masked than in control group.

Masks didn't avoid infections significantly, and both gross present very similar SMALL numbers.

acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
Being numbers of infected so small and similar (42vs53) the confidence margin lead to a cloud of possibilities in which the most probable is NO DIFFERENCE at all.
Statistical extremes are masks being ~40% effective OR even ~20% perjuditial.

Masks aren't saving humanity.
We all have seen this crappy pure fictional graphs as science. They never were

Now we've the truth

The BEST, even so unlikely, mask benefit is only ~40%.

But the most likely, as science knew, is that NO DIFFERENCE shows. They're useless.

&what if they're WORSE?!
Read 6 tweets
18 Nov
Covid paranoic narrative has stand from the very beginning in IGNORANCE.

We don't know, that's always the answer.
We scientifically DID know a lot: epidemics, respiratory viruses, coronavirus.
Then we quick learn A HUGE LOT on cv19.

We're just forced to pretend we don't know.
There's no troll claiming this universal need of ignorance: I don't know equals nobody does, it doesn't matter u being the science schooling. Ignorance must be defended.

And so, everything becomes new and concerning.
Curiously we're demanded infinite faith on covid full paraphernalia.
Restrictions, which have no evidence at all working, neither in pre, nor in post covid science, MUST be done.
'Young healthy people dies/suffers horrible sequels' is statistically false, but we act like is truth
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
The blaming game.

To cover the FACT that restrictions are blatantly doing nothing on epidemic develope, press and politics have applied the perverse blaming game reasoning:

When numbers are good, it's restrictions working.
When they go bad, IRRESPONSIBLE citizens are to blame.
So, Madrid restrictions are miraculous working because they're fine; but SAME restrictions, with some harder ones added, FAILING in Catalonia are definitely because of irresponsible citizenship.

Astounding how much of the population buys this shit: social suspiciousness rises.
That childish egocentric mentality shows up in polls.

Asked for self degree of norm accomplish, people value themselves 8.9/10
They consider the rest only doing 5.4/10

Truth, accomplish is high&even: this cognitive dissonance avoids a terrible fact. Restrictions don't work
Read 5 tweets
16 Nov
The study from Apolona et al. has find specific antigens for SARSCoV2 in blood samples from Italy as old as September '19.

It implies A LOT of changes in the childish narratives on covid, and sports many of the ideas we've been defending here.

Thread

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
The very early and wide spread of the virus, implies its presence wasn't producing anything notorious without the press panic push.

It was there, and running, and it wasn't the end of the world.

And it wasn't one isolate case, but a good 10% in September.
2nd, the epidemic develope presents the same seasonality we've observed in 2020.
It's notorious that 19 develope occurred WITHOUT restrictions, and the 20 with the most insane ones.

With no restrictions at all, the virus waved down naturally.

Good bye, restrictions working myth
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct
Modern medicine was SO incredible in 2019. We've reached a scifi level of knowledge&practice, over some certain basic practices working very good. Problem was resources, not protocols.

Why is now better to do what WE'VE NEVER DONE BEFORE?!!

IT'S NOT.

Science was good enough!
Quarentining the infected? Never Done Before with modern medicine.
Testing for respiratory virus as universal diagnosis tool? NDB
Trying to trace a respiratory desease? NDB
Universal masking? NDB
Confining the healthy? NDB
Monopolizing health resources to ONE cause? NDB
Considering asymptomatics as sick? NDB
Considering any person as a vector? NDB
Banning mouth to mouth resurrection maneuver as general caution protocol in emergency? NBD
Accepting cloth masks as valid for virus stopping? NDB
Using PCR as diagnosis tool? NDB
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!