The people who *cried at work* because Jordan Peterson wrote a book don't get to call anyone "fragile" ever again.
Woke people accuse anyone who doesn't agree with them of having "white fragility," "male fragility," or "fragile masculinity."
Meanwhile, these same woke activists *start crying on the job* because they can't handle the fact that Jordan Peterson wrote a book.
They're babies.
These people go on and on about how everyone else is "fragile" and #masculinitysofragile and white fragility and blah blah blah. They then proceed to demand "safe spaces" and "triggar warnings" while crying over books and throwing temper tantrums at work.
No more.
We are done taking this seriously.
Accusations of fragility from the people who cry when they don't get a safe space will be either brushed off and ignored or mocked relentlessly.
That's it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ When Dr. Peterson's wife was diagnosed with cancer he was prescribed Benzodiazepines, a drug which can create dependancy in as little as 2-4 weeks. The widrawl symptoms associated with Benzodiazepines can be shockingly severe and can last for over a year.
2/ Getting off Benzodiazepines is an *ORDEAL* both because the withdrawl symptoms from Benzodiazepines can kill you, and because actually getting off them takes specialized medical planning to manage the withdrawl.
3/ Benzodiazepine dependancy and withdrawl are also particularly dangerous for older people and Jordan Peterson is 58. It's no surprise that it almost killed him.
1/ Woke person: "You're Racist"
You: "No I'm not"
Woke person: "That's what a racist would say!"
See that? That's a "Kafka Trap," and it's a strategy the woke often use when they want to call someone a racist, sexist, bigot, etc.
So, lets talk about Kafka Traps,
A thread🧵
2/ The purpose of a Kafka Trap is, as the name suggests, to Trap you in an accusation. The Kafka Trap works by rigging the conversation so that it doesn't matter how you deny an accusation, the accusers can still make you look guilty.
Let's look at how it works.
3/ The Kafka Trap has two simple steps:
1. The person using the Kafka Trap accuses you of something
2. When you deny the accusation, the person using the Kafka Trap will take your denial and twist in such a way that they can use it against you to make you look guilty.
Failure to meet this with all the power we have is going to end up with us being totally unable to fight back on the internets largest video distribution medium.
We have to fire back before they notmalize the shut down of anyone who goes against woke orthodoxy.
We HAVE to...
WE CAN DO THIS!!!
Just a couple of weeks ago we succesfully pushed back against @target after they censored @AbigailShrier's book 'Irreversible Damage.'
1/ So, @IshitaChandel1 is lying about a paper to get it retracted by saying it links whiteness to intelligence. This is a lie. The paper makes no such claim, and in fact doesn even hint at such a claim.
2/ The paper only looked at white people of British Ancestory. No one else participated in the study. This means it was comparing White Brits to other White Brits, and that means all the people in the test that didn't have the genes for intelligence *WERE WHITE*
3/ Not only that, but in only surveying white brits (they state this explicitly) the paper doesnt mention *whiteness* as it excludes the french, germans, finish, polish, swedes, and irish to name a few. So it doesn't look at white populations as a whole, and doesn't claim to:
This is wrong, absolutely wrong. The literature in Critical Race Theory is not going to use proper, appropriate, or rigorous methods. CRT is not hit or miss, it's a bad method based on flawed assumptions. The problem is the *method* of CRT, it's rotten to the core....
And that is why this is bad. The Problem is not considering race in medical decisions, or observing how race might be a relevant variabls in public health, the problem is using Critical Race Theory to do the analysis. The underlying assumltions and method of CRT are wrong...
I don't dislike phrenology because I don't want to study psychology, I dislike phrenology because it's pseudo-intellectual nonsense.
I don't dislike CRT because I want to avoid studying how race relates to health, I dislike CRT because its pseudo-intellectual nonsense
Jesus when asked why he eats with tax collectors who steal from the poor: "It is not the healthy who need a doctor but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."
Progressive "Christians":
The works part about this is that this woman has the most self-righteous, sanctimonious, "not like those icky republican evangelicals" attitude I have ever seen. It's disgusting.
These people claim to be on the side of Jesus, unlike all those Trump supporing evangelicals...
But they can't even have dinner with people who disagree with them. Not only that, but this woman wants to free people from the burden of having to spend time over the holidays with anyone who might vote for Trump.
All while attacking Conservative evangelicals for....