As we grapple with social media & other new tech, it is worth knowing Historian Kranzberg's 6 Laws of Technology, in a 🧵:
1st Law: “Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral” - many problems occur when benign technologies are used at scale. Think DDT (or Facebook)
2nd law: “Invention is the mother of necessity” - new technologies, as they scale, require their own suites of innovations. Self driving cars have pushed development of new sensors, phones ever better cameras, etc. This is a good rule for entrepreneurs looking for new markets.
3rd law - “Technology comes in packages, big and small” Technology is all about systems, you can’t study individual things in isolation. One issue with blockchain is that it doesn’t fit well into the social, organizational, and technical systems that it is supposed to replace.
4th law (short version): “Technology is critical to many policy decisions but non-technical issues are usually given more importance.” Political, social and business concerns shape which solutions are used, even if a better technology is available. Think the debates over nuclear.
5th law: “All history is relevant, but the history of technology is the most relevant.” Look behind any aspect of the development of the modern world and you will see a parallel story about technology. (Also worth nothing that the laws were developed by a historian of tech!)
6th law - “Technology is a very human activity.” Technologies are developed and used by people. I’ll let Kranzberg himself describe why this matters through two excellent examples.

Like all academic laws, take them with a grain of salt, but they are a wise check on bad pundits.
Here's a nice recent article covering the Kranzberg's Laws, if you want more context. wsj.com/articles/the-6…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ethan Mollick

Ethan Mollick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emollick

20 Nov
So chess is having a moment thanks to the Queen’s Gambit (see the chart from @DataIsBeautiful). It is also a subject of a lot of social science research. So, a thread of findings on ♟that tell us things about intelligence, luck, and how we learn 1/n Image
First, chess is often viewed as a game that makes players smarter at other tasks, but the research shows that isn’t true. You don’t need to learn chess unless you want to learn chess! 2/
Chess is really a game of skill, much more so than any other commonly played game, the best player usually wins. 3/
Read 4 tweets
18 Nov
A paper I think about all the time: In an experiment where people are asked to sit quietly for 15 minutes & enjoy their thoughts or else self-administer 𝗽𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗰𝗸𝘀, 2/3 of men and 1/4 of women choose to shock themselves. erinwestgate.com/uploads/7/6/4/…
Also if you haven’t read the fine print over the graph...
Everyone in the experiment had already had a chance to be shocked, so it wasn’t new to them & they knew it hurt. The experiment is covered more in this neat summary of the research on thinking for pleasure - why it’s good, and why we hate it. nickbuttrick.com/files/Advances…
Read 4 tweets
24 Oct
Scientists have always had a thing for Middle Earth. It has been the subject of many published academic journal articles, as well as some great analyses by scientists from their disciplines. Here are some good ones, the more elaborate the better... 1/n theatlantic.com/health/archive…
Let’s start with geology, and geologist & science fiction author @katsudonburi’s issues with Tolkien’s mountain ranges (written before plate tectonics was a known thing) 2/n tor.com/2017/08/01/tol…
And then there is this terrific map of the rocks of Middle Earth by a cosmogeologist 3/n
Read 8 tweets
17 Oct
People spend 15% of work in meetings (managers spend 50%!) & post-COVID meetings are up 14%. But we spend little time trying to make meetings better, despite the fact that there is a whole subfield of research on the topic! Here is a review of findings. researchgate.net/publication/32… ImageImageImage
Here’s the highlights as emoji:

Before the meeting...
✅only meet if needed
🐁keep meeting sizes as small as possible
🎯set clear goals & outcomes
📄have an agenda that all review in advance
⏰make it short & relevant to all invited 2/4
During the meeting...
⏱arrive on time
📋follow the agenda
🙋‍♀️🙋‍♂️everyone participates
💻📱never multitask
⚔️intervene if mood turns negative
🤪humor helps performance
🙅‍♀️leave time for objections
🗳Let everyone help decision-making. If a decision is made, tell everyone
3/4
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct
A great example of borrowing innovation from one field for another. Doctors at a struggling children's hospital sent videos of their post-surgical hand-offs to Ferrari's F1 pit crew (see the GIF!) to improve. They reworked the process & reduced associated errors rates by 66%. 1/2
The diagrams show how the F1 crews used their techniques to help the surgery teams reorganize the surgery to ICU handoff. The paper is here: 2/2 asq.org/healthcare-use… ImageImage
The Youtube video for the original GIF of the Ferrari F1 pit crew is here, and it is worth watching it (or the GIF) multiple times, each time focusing on a different person doing their job with incredible speed and precision.
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
Does it make the Mafia seem more or less cool when you know that it was created to control the market for lemons? After the discovery of citrus as a cure for scurvy there demand for Sicilian 🍋 went crazy. The Mafia was formed in response to a commodity boom to keep prices high.
The paper is here: cambridge.org/core/services/…

And, in the great tradition of economics papers, the title is a bit of an inside joke, referring to a very famous economics paper about the market for (metaphorical) lemons.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!