Another datapoint that I can describe but not show evidence of...
A cyber researcher reviewed the first mentions of “Flynn-Russia” and as it turns out, the same ‘Russian Bots’ ID’d by NGO’s were touching on “Flynn Russia” in February 2016.
... what does ☝🏻tell you about the “Russian Bots”?!
Hopefully this researcher will publish those results some day; I no longer have contact with him.
Twitter deleted those “Russian Bot” accounts, making it difficult/impossible to replicate the research.
... but I know it to be true, bc I saw his work - he checked on it specifically bc we wanted to measure Social Media response to General Flynn involvement in campaign.
They were likely ‘masked’ as Russian bots; the fact they were pointing at Flynn goes entirely against...
... the MSM narrative that Russian was pro-Trump and helped him win.
Anyone can make “Russian Bots”... and Pro-Clinton NGO’s & Big Tech certainly did.
Same thing happened to us over the weekend - all we do is show up (for free, crowdsourced travel expenses) to make sure that people are allowed to talk w/o getting their asses beat.
And we have another organizer give us shit?!? 🤷🏼♂️