Thread by @stealthbadger

Man at PA hearing who claims to have witnessed several possibly suspicious things involved with the voting, none of which were definitely fraudulent in any way: "I think there were honest people who saw what they wanted to see," with absolutely no self-awareness.

OH MY GOD THIS GUY IS TRYING TO DESCRIBE BITLOCKER AND HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT BITLOCKER DOES.

Imagine a hearing with Nunes, Collins, Gaetz, and Jordan, with their hand-picked witnesses.

THIS PA SENATE HEARING IS WORSE THAN THAT

I'm not saying that there isn't vote-counting fraud. I'm saying it's really hard, and it would be REALLY hard to do it on a mass scale, while leaving evidence that it happened, without leaving any hard evidence as to exactly where it was done or who did it.

When Rudy Giulani comes up to "explain" or "clarify" things, as a natural consequence things become less clear and understandable.

Apparently batch processing of vote totals is evidence of fraud.

splice

https://twitter.com/stealthbadger/status/1331671188930752513

When a witness says "our white-hat cyber hacking team uses public information to gather evidence" they are BULLSHITTING YOU ABOUT SOMETHING

"Using paper and ink analysis with a microspectrometer to determine if these ballots were mass produced"

WHAT THE FUCK I HAVE HIT THE LD50 FOR BULLSLHIT BUZZWORDS

The "witnesses" aren't being asked any questions, no Dems appear to be present, and this is all 🔥🐎💩

THIS "POLL WATCHER" IS PRESENTING A "WATCHER CERTIFICATE" SIGNED BY DONALD TRUMP, AND IT SAYS HE IS AUTHORIZED TO WATCH ANY POLLING PLACE IN THE COUNTY, AND HE IS TOTALLY NOT A KOOK

@orchid_grey I need to ask, am I hearing this right, or should I seek medical attention?

The "totally not a kook" guy also doesn't like that fact-checkers didn't like his video.

We now have an attorney who says he is licensed to practice law in Illinois and Florida testifying in a "hearing" about an election in Pennsylvania.

It's totally amazing that not one person involved in this nationwide conspiracy has gotten drunk and bragged about their role to someone who thought "hey, I could make a quick buck/become famous by breaking this story!"

It is a mystery as to why. 🤭

THANK GOODNESS, THIS GUY IS RUNNING OUT OF TIME

The next witness is again asking for things that can not be solved in an anonymous voting system.

You can have end-to-end auditing, or you can have a truly anonymous ballot. You can't have both.

Incoming false equivalence-based Equal Protection argument to try and trigger Bush v Gore II

I know none of y'all will be surprised by this, but I've seen maybe five masks at this "hearing," most of them badly fitting. I expect to hear about this hearing later, but under "COVID-19" instead of "Politics."

Senator just said "facts are stubborn things, and I thank you for laying them out here for us."

They haven't been laying out facts so much as speculation.

I'm a godless heathen, but the only words I can use to describe this is that listening to these people is killing my soul.

This next testimony makes no sense.

BREAKING: WITNESSES HAVE DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES IN DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS AND/OR AT DIFFERENT TIMES HAVE DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES

Shorter current witness: NEW TECHNOLOGY IS VOTER SUPPRESSION!

JFC the people applauding him.

I think that machines should only be used for scanning, and that ballots should be hand-marked, and if there is a recount/audit they should be hand-counted, but this is ridiculous.

Person saying they're a registered Democrat and only wants a fair election gets applause. She claims to have showed up at the polling place to work and describes several immediate violations, as well as hostility from everybody else.

I have no idea what is going on here.

Splice:

https://twitter.com/stealthbadger/status/1331682082419056642