In xtreme cfg (25 cm apart, aerosols emitting 3000 times more micro-particles/sec than speech), barrier effect was compared with a particule counter w/ integrated pump (6 chan) placed at the lvl of the mouth. 6 different protective configurations were tested repeated 10x.
- The only protection of the recipient shows a much more effective attenuation by the face shield 54.8% than the mask 21.8% (including for aerosols of less than 0.3 microns; p = 0.003)
- The only control at the source is much more effective for the screen and the mask (96.7% NS)
- The dual protection of transmitter> <receiver is even greater and attenuates by 98% for the screen vs the 97.3% mask (p = 0.02).
This study confirms the results of the 3 previous studies w/ different technical approaches = Ronen (water-sensitive paper aerosols), Viola (BOS) and Arumuru (laser imaging).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jc James

Jc James Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jcjames_ca

27 Nov
Crash course on well-done tests for all, i.e. useful for patients, doctors and researchers.
(sub available)
//next

@PanData19 @NickHudsonCT
If you are interested.
(2020-08-24) History of the performance of Covid-19 tests at IHU Méditerranée-Infection
(2020-09-25) Are antigen tests effective (vs PCR) ?
Read 7 tweets
26 Nov
@sabhlok Then I am the one who's incompetent. I have not been censored on MeWe and was thinking it was from it. Wrong inference. No excuses.

I actually started checking for myself the first time you talked about it a few weeks ago.
//nxt
@sabhlok Still, MeWe ToS does * not * cover freedom of expression, only (data) privacy and censorship seems to occur on that base.

Maybe @markweinstein can help us here on that matter ?

Here are the questions I asked on MeWe:
// nxt Image
@sabhlok @markweinstein (Q1) Why conflating FoS and privacy when we know that users will understand "public free speech" not "sandboxed data (speech) privacy" ? //nxt
- mewe.com/values
- rappler.com/technology/soc… ImageImage
Read 10 tweets
22 Nov
Marseille (France)

> The number of cases is collapsing at an astonishing speed

...and this team knows how to test seriously - check my previous posts on the subject

(sub available)


.
-- Cases falling fast and before news lockdowns ImageImage
-- The medically NULL effect of restrictive social measures is proven (as long as we look at objective data - always with THE SAME PARAMETER OF MEASURES since January, ... //next Image
Read 9 tweets
20 Nov
Masks for prevention of viral respiratory infections among health care workers and the public

PEER umbrella systematic review / July 2020

cfp.ca/content/66/7/5…

@sebrushworth @naomirwolf @WENDLINGJeanMi1
"This systematic review found limited evidence that the use of masks might reduce the risk of viral respiratory infections. In the community setting, a possible reduced risk of influenza like illness was found among mask users.
In health care workers, the results show no difference between N95 masks and surgical masks on the risk of confirmed influenza or other confirmed viral respiratory infections,
Read 5 tweets
18 Nov
Dr. Roger Hodkinson is spot on except for aerosol transmission is almost nonexistent, and it is mostly surface transmission (wash your hands).
(8h25'37")
Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons committee in Ottawa, CEO of a large private medical laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta and Chairman of a Medical Biotech company SELLING THE COVID-19 TEST:
//next
"M. Chairman, this is Dr Hodkinson. [...] Thank you very much and I do appreciate the opportunity to address you on this very important matter. What i'm going to say is lay language and blunt. It's counter narrative and so you don't immediately think I'm a quack,
Read 21 tweets
17 Nov
(1) The Great Reset discourse seems to be a direct transfer from the Genesis flood narrative. Aberrations in both cases.
(2) While important, traditions aren't silver bullets. They can't produce civilizations lasting more than 350 years.
//next
(3) Very few exceptions have existed. One worth citing is the ancient Greek civilization but it was a blend of traditions, democracy and openness to some degree.
(4) Evolution is Individuation in time. The article misses that understanding individuation is key for our evolution.
Basics:
- Horst Bredekamp (Darwin's Corals)
- Schopenhauer's Opus or B. Magee (The Philosophy of Schopenhauer)
- Sloterdijk (Spheres + Rules for the Human Zoo)
- G. Simondon (translated by Taylor Adkins 2020)
- A Lima-de-Faria (Evolution without Selection)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!