The excellent ECB Financial Stability Review, ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/fsr/ec… illustrates well the 2 main risks I see for the EA economy next year: possible insufficient fiscal stimulus and weakening of bank credit supply. The FSR mentions “a slightly tighter fiscal stance" in 2021 1/
The FSR correct statement “fiscal tightening at a time when output gaps are still projected to be negative could exacerbate the current economic situation.”, caused some stir and many comments in social media. The same regarding the accompanying chart 2/
The FSR uses the Commission forecasts showing a slight increase of the cyclically-adjusted primary budget balance from -3.2% this year to -2.9% in 2021. 0.3% is a small change not comparable with the mistake of 2012/13 when it went from -0.6% in 2011 to +0.5 & +1.4 in 2012/13 3/
I think the primary balance will end-up higher than those forecasts because families and firms will continue to need a lot of support in the first half of the year. Moreover, growth in 2021 is dependent on public expenditure as other demand components will not be very buoyant. 4/
As the FSR says: “A premature withdrawal of policy support and a protracted pandemic could prolong the recession and have permanent scarring effects.” Besides extending income transfers to families and firms, more public investment is indispensable for a robust recovery 5/
Regarding banks, their problem is lack of profitability, low stock prices abysmal Price-to-Book ratios (chart). Consequently difficulty in raising capital in the market when more will be necessary to absorb further losses from bad loans later on. 6/
More loan losses impacting capital are coming this year, with Governments discontinuing guarantees. The FSR reminds: “Bank capital buffers should remain available to absorb losses for an extended period, and any impediments to banks using buffers should be addressed” 7/
However, the releasable buffers are small and either the markets or the supervisors apparently won´t condone big reductions of capital ratios (see chart). In this case, the end result might be deleveraging and a reduction of credit growth with negative economic consequences 8/
That means that capital and not liquidity will be the operative constraint to credit supply. Still, it will be appropriate to extend TLTRO III allotments until the end of the year, to provide some stimulus to credit supply, especially induced by the rate bonification in place 9/
Bank stocks suffered again this year despite the overall boost provided by monetary policy. This decomposition of stock valuations shows the positive contributions of lower discount rates and dividend/buybacks offsetting the negative effect of earnings and the equity premium 10/
Monetary policy improved the Financial Conditions Index to easing levels above the pre-pandemic times (chart), but this refers only to creating incentives for economic agents increasing real expenditures, which cannot happen significantly in this type of crisis 11/
As the indirect incentives of Monetary policy are showing diminishing returns, only fiscal stimulus in the form of public expenditure with income transfers and investment creates real demand for goods and services to offset the deceleration of private spending. 12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vitor Constâncio

Vitor Constâncio Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VMRConstancio

22 Oct
Many papers have emerged analysing the March episode of price collapse and illiquidity in US treasuries, an unprecedented event in the “deepest and most liquid “ financial market in the world. Many things hinge on this analysis 1/n
Two days ago, at the ECB Monetary Conference, ecb.europa.eu/pub/conference… , A.V-J presented a comprehensive paper. It identified the main sellers after the severity of the virus came into the open: investment/mutual funds, hedge funds and non-residents.2/
On a panel with D. Duffie and Vice-Chair Quarles at a webinar organised by the Systemic Risk Council on 14th Oct. , I particularly underlined the role of hedge fund´s sales as they unwound Treasuries basis trades that crucially involve funding with repos 3/..
Read 11 tweets
13 Oct
Amid the Trump shenanigans of last week, the relevant speech by the FED Chairman J. Powell was perhaps not much noticed. He clarified some aspects of the new monetary framework (that so far didn´t trigger any new measures) and made a very strong appeal for more fiscal stimulus /1
“The expansion is still far from complete. At this early stage, I would argue that the risks of policy intervention are still asymmetric. Too little support would lead to a weak recovery..By contrast, the risks of overdoing it, seem..to be smaller”/2 federalreserve.gov/newsevents/spe…
Basically, he implied that monetary policy is practically done:“ The Committee also left the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged . and it expects .. to maintain this target range.”. So, the additional effort has to be fiscal. The same approach applies to Europe. /3
Read 12 tweets
28 Sep
Besides the increasing virus infections and the dangerous volatility coming from the US, two main points became more visible, augmenting downside risks for Europe: likely insufficiency of fiscal policy and possible credit supply deceleration due to a stressed banking sector !/7
The first stems from the delay of the Recovery Fund (NGEU) disbursements and the possible caution of national fiscal policies, after a year of big deficits in 2020. The regrettable protracted timetable for the NGEU payouts is in this ECB chart 2/7 ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/ecbu/e…
The recovery depends mostly on fiscal policy staying expansionary, as consumers increase their savings and investment suffers from unused capacity and lack of demand. The suspension of the Stability Pact for 2021 was welcomed, but we need a deep revision of the Pact 3/7
Read 7 tweets
21 Sep
Thoughtful @ErikFossing on the Goodhart/Pradhan book. In my blurb, in the book, I recalled that “demography is destiny” but there is no determinism. It is a “great thought-provoking book” that deals with many deep trends, from labour supply, inflation, and the “debt trap”.1/6
Other drivers, besides declining demography, affect future labour supply and wages, so that future high inflation is not a certainty. I ask “Will AI be enough to counter the labour shortage?” There is also later retirement and Japan. The book discusses it, but doubts remain 2/6
Ageing and health & retirement costs imply higher taxation or more debt. A future clash between fiscal and monetary policy is possible due to the “debt trap” problem, questioning CBs independence. The present policy cooperation may not last 3/6
Read 6 tweets
14 Sep
Analysts and even some FED members have belittled the recent framework change as just a form of target symmetry or temporarily accepting inflation above target. However, the decision was to go for Averaging Inflation Targeting (AIT), which is different /1 ft.com/content/d2fd2c…
AIT strategy is a commitment to take measures to increase inflation above the average target (e.g.2%) if actual inflation had been below it for several years. So, it should commit the FED to decide now on corresponding policy changes. Will it happen this week? /2
What could change? Since March 23, the QE policy is already to purchase “in the amounts needed to support smooth market functioning and effective transmission of monetary policy,”, i.e.,” whatever is necessary” or “unlimited”. No need to announce new numbers to use it. /3
Read 6 tweets
9 Sep
I said that CBs, like the ECB, can still wait some time before year-end to take new decisions and assess data developments. The recessionary shock and the decrease in oil prices weakened inflation, and monetary policy cannot overcome that in the short-term./1
The recovery is continuing, w/ the latest composite PMI at 52, indicating expansion. Fiscal policy is now more effective than Mon.Pol. to help growth. The ECB has an expansionary policy w/ negative rates & still increasing balance-sheet whereas the FEB stopped temporarily /2
The FED decided on a new regime of averaging inflation-targeting(AIT) that other major CBs are likely to follow. However, the FED has not yet acted on it. AIT commits the CB to take measures to increase inflation above target after years of being below. Will the FED move now? /3
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!