Share this page!

Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture
Twitter logo
27 Nov, 6 tweets, 2 min read
1/
 This is not true. The argument is not that it is ok to fire faculty for teaching Critical Race Theory. The argument is that if someone insists that ideas, policies, and concepts from critical race theory be used togovern the workplace you can get rid of them for the same...
2/
 Reason you can get rid of an employee who insists the workplace be run in accordance with Christian values and continues to preach in the break room.

To wit, there is a difference between the university as educational space and the university as a workplace.

I can teach...
3/
 That Christians are going to hell in my class...I can't insist on going after Christians in the break room and letting them have it whenever they appear, or harassingthem woth taunts in the line for lunch and menace them

This is what @ConceptualJames is talking about...
4/
 If someone insists thst the work place be run according the their wok social judtice beliefs and refuse to allow the other employees to work withoug getting on them about it...if they refuse to drop it...terminating ought to be am option.

Yes, there must be limits to this...
5/
 But clearly @ConceptualJames is not arguing for firing tenured professors for discussing Critical Race Theory in class
6/
 Or espousing those views in class.

Also....sorry for my typos!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Wokal DistΔnce

Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture
27 Nov
1/
 This Black Lives Matter protest happened in the middle of the pandemic and the woke/media/blue-check industrial complex cheered it on.
Now they want to close churches and shutdown thanksgiving.

I called for lockdowns in march and I'm infuriated.

A thread🧵
2/
 In March I worked for a government in Canada that implemented testing, tracing, capcity limits on indoor gatherings, and social distancing.

These measures work and allowed us to re-open churches, synagogues, mosques, and small businesses back in *JULY*

We have stayed open.
3/
 In light of a recent surge, the government mandated masks in public.

I support this.

As a result of these measures number of confirmed active cases is less than .1%.

Churches and synagogues contiue to *REMAIN OPEN* (with some limits on capacity)

So, why am I angry?
Read 18 tweets
Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture
25 Nov
1/
 When Dr. Peterson's wife was diagnosed with cancer he was prescribed Benzodiazepines, a drug which can create dependancy in as little as 2-4 weeks. The widrawl symptoms associated with Benzodiazepines can be shockingly severe and can last for over a year.
2/
 Getting off Benzodiazepines is an *ORDEAL* both because the withdrawl symptoms from Benzodiazepines can kill you, and because actually getting off them takes specialized medical planning to manage the withdrawl.
3/
 Benzodiazepine dependancy and withdrawl are also particularly dangerous for older people and Jordan Peterson is 58. It's no surprise that it almost killed him.
Read 8 tweets
Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture
24 Nov
The people who *cried at work* because Jordan Peterson wrote a book don't get to call anyone "fragile" ever again.
Woke people accuse anyone who doesn't agree with them of having "white fragility," "male fragility," or "fragile masculinity."

Meanwhile, these same woke activists *start crying on the job* because they can't handle the fact that Jordan Peterson wrote a book.

They're babies.
These people go on and on about how everyone else is "fragile" and #masculinitysofragile and white fragility and blah blah blah. They then proceed to demand "safe spaces" and "triggar warnings" while crying over books and throwing temper tantrums at work.
Read 4 tweets
Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture
24 Nov
1/
 Woke person: "You're Racist"
You: "No I'm not"
Woke person: "That's what a racist would say!"

See that? That's a "Kafka Trap," and it's a strategy the woke often use when they want to call someone a racist, sexist, bigot, etc.

So, lets talk about Kafka Traps,

A thread🧵
2/
 The purpose of a Kafka Trap is, as the name suggests, to Trap you in an accusation. The Kafka Trap works by rigging the conversation so that it doesn't matter how you deny an accusation, the accusers can still make you look guilty.

Let's look at how it works.
3/
 The Kafka Trap has two simple steps:

1. The person using the Kafka Trap accuses you of something

2. When you deny the accusation, the person using the Kafka Trap will take your denial and twist in such a way that they can use it against you to make you look guilty.
Read 19 tweets
Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture
24 Nov
This is censorship.
Youtube will not allow any video that goes against the views of radical trans-activists.

This is a bigger scandal than what happened to @scrowder.

We have to raise hell about this amd we have to do it right now before the precedent gets set in stone...
Failure to meet this with all the power we have is going to end up with us being totally unable to fight back on the internets largest video distribution medium.

We have to fire back before they notmalize the shut down of anyone who goes against woke orthodoxy.

We HAVE to...
WE CAN DO THIS!!!

Just a couple of weeks ago we succesfully pushed back against @target after they censored @AbigailShrier's book 'Irreversible Damage.'

Remember?

We won and forced them to put it back in stock.

Read 6 tweets
Wokal DistΔnce Profile picture
20 Nov
1/
 So, @IshitaChandel1 is lying about a paper to get it retracted by saying it links whiteness to intelligence. This is a lie. The paper makes no such claim, and in fact doesn even hint at such a claim.
2/
 The paper only looked at white people of British Ancestory. No one else participated in the study. This means it was comparing White Brits to other White Brits, and that means all the people in the test that didn't have the genes for intelligence *WERE WHITE*
3/
 Not only that, but in only surveying white brits (they state this explicitly) the paper doesnt mention *whiteness* as it excludes the french, germans, finish, polish, swedes, and irish to name a few. So it doesn't look at white populations as a whole, and doesn't claim to:
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @wokal_distance