1/9 I believe most DeFi credit protocols like will end up creating their own insurance pool underwritten by tokenholders. Why?
🔸Gives governors skin in the game and an incentive to make good decisions
🔸Better product for users who want insurance as they deposit
2/9
🔸Transforms idle market cap into balance sheet, generating fees
🔸Risks can be bundled into products and offered to users based on their particular preferences
3/9 While we believe this makes a lot of sense as a token model, we don't think it is competitive but rather complementary to @NexusMutual
This is because insurance relies on leverage to be efficient and leverage requires diversified, uncorrelated risk exposures
4/9 Risks across the crypto space are already highly correlated, but this is even more pronounced within a particular credit protocol since:
🔸smart contracts are all built by the same people
🔸the same oracles used in the same way across protocol
🔸risk framework is uniform
5/9 The only way for projects to avoid this is to diversify, offering cover to other projects
Not only is this not their core competency, they are also competing with Nexus's existing diversified capital pool which enables more leverage and better rates
6/9 As such, a dedicated insurance protocol like @NexusMutual that underwrites risk across the space (and eventually outside of it) must always exist and will likely always be more efficient than specialised insurance pools
7/9 While some (maybe most) users will prefer convenience of buying insurance directly from their credit provider, many will choose Nexus for efficiency either as insurer or reinsurer
Projects themselves will also use Nexus to insure against protocol-level risks
8/9 Despite the MCR cucking as @DegenSpartan so aptly puts it, we still see @NexusMutual as the most efficient insurance model in DeFi right now
Its strong brand, $85M capital pool and diversified cover exposure represent real moats that upstarts will have to overcome
9/9 It's worth remembering that unlike with other DeFi protocols, liquidity provides an actual moat for Nexus since MCR is locked at 100%
This gives Nexus a headstart in the form of a large supply of capital to focus on what matters: generating cover demand
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As someone who is #irresponsiblylong both Bitcoin and DeFi, I cannot understand the constant tensions and bickering between the communities
In yesterday's daily, I explore why I believe Bitcoin and DeFi are symbiotic rather than competitive
Thread 👇
1/11 Bitcoin can be seen as "Digital Gold", with its like for like characteristics as a store of value being superior in every way
However, it's also much more than this as it's natively digital nature enables programmability, utility and financial innovation at software speed
2/ Bitcoin is not only a financial asset that is no one else’s liability, it can also be used as part of a broader financial system without becoming someone else’s liability
Rather than trust a counterparty, users need only trust cryptoeconomic incentives and human greed
While my time investing in crypto and previously playing poker has gotten me used to experiencing large daily personal net worth volatility, it's never a pleasant experience
Short thread (by my standards...) with some ramblings that help me get through it 👇
1/10 Imo, some DeFi projects represent 10-1000x upside opportunities
Obviously, like all of crypto, it is extremely risky and can go to 0. That said, given the magnitude of potential outcomes, it just doesn't have to succeed that often to make it a massively +EV bet
2/10 As with all early stage tech, realising these outcomes will require 4-8 year holds
Unlike early stage tech, crypto investors will have liquidity, i.e. the possibility, and thus the temptation, to sell
With the yield farming craze and recent market drop, we've begun to hear calls of a so-called "DeFi Bubble", with a few arguing DeFi has topped
In today's daily, I take a longer term view and look at YF, DeFi vs ICO boomand where I think we are in the cycle
Thread 👇
(1/27) First, it's important to realise speculation has always been crypto's killer app
The ICO boom was only the most extreme example, but crypto's history is dotted with boom and bust cycles, dating back to 2013 and Namecoin, Mastercoin (now Omni) and Maidsafe
(2/27) For those who lived through the ICO madness, the recent food coin high season 🍣🍠 🍝 may bring flashbacks of the futility coin fuelled 2017 boom (ht @Obstropolos)
While the underlying mechanism is the same, there are some fundamental differences worth exploring
For my last two @Delphi_Digital dailies, I touched on DEXes, aggregation theory and long-term value capture, questioning whether AMMs are set to become the Airlines of Crypto.
Time for a thread
👇
(1/15) Aggregation theory, first suggested by @stratechery, describes how the internet changed value capture by commoditising distribution
Thus, suppliers could build direct relationships with consumers cheaply. Consumer choice exploded, necessitating the rise of aggregators
(2/15) A similar phenomenon is happing with DEXes
While initially users interacted with their favourite DEX directly, aggregators such as 1inchexchange, DEX.AG and others have emerged allowing users to get best execution on trades across all active DEXes